Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Many thanks.

My weight is now about 75.5Kg (naked and breathing out lol).

It was hovering up to about 80Kg but I am not a muscular build so my %fat may still be close to 30%.

I stopped smoking about 45 years ago but I usually drink several cups of coffee daily......

I have a Thai Bicycle, no gears and I ride it for a 20 minute session round the block, more or less daily but it is very flat where we live.

I do not eat bread, potatoes, rice, cheese, milk (though I use the Nestle coffee mate).

I avoid any processed foods like sausages and street food.

In my veggies I do not use any sauces, no MSG and only a little locally made sea salt and we use coconut oil and there is usually some fresh turmeric in the mix.

I eat plenty of raw garlic with every meal.

I have almost totally cut out beer and drink very little spirits.

I do however have a very enlarged prostate and take Lopress for that. (My Dad had prostate problems)

The Lopress also lowers BP but I have been reading that medications that lower BP can actually have death as a side effect and lower numbers don't cure heart disease.

Since my PSA results are in the high end of normal, I am now starting to think I might be better off with no medication????

My Cancer Markers are:-
Prostate marker    1.97    ng/ml    (0-4)
Liver Marker    5.08    ng/ml    (0-9)

So despite having :-

Multiple cysts in both hepatic lobes, more at left lobe.
About 4 lesions at left lobe, of which the largest one seen at lateral segment at subcapsular area showing lobulated contour and tihn septation, about 5.1x3.3 cm. The rest are up to 3.4 cm in maximal dimension.
A lobulated 1.3-cm one with septation at segment VIII.
A 0.9-c, one at segment VI.
A 0.4-cm gallbladder polyp.
A 2.3-cm poorly calcified gallstone.
A 0.9-cm CBD stone with mild dilated proximal CBD (1.0 cm).
A 0.8-cm cortical cyst at lower pole of right kidney.
Few cortical scars at left kidney.
Markedly enlarged prostate gland, 83 ml.

(Sorry about the translation)

 

I consider it's not too bad for 75 years old and if I continue with my diet and lose those last few pounds, some of the aforementioned problems may actually start to bet better?

 

The blood tests were a little dissapointing as they only showed the total cholesterol without the split for HDH and LDL so they are not a lot of use.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

" medications that lower BP can actually have death as a side effect "  - pretty much any medication will have rare cases of death associated, the key word is "rare" and usually there are specific risk factors like allergy.

 

You need to be careful about what you read and do not accept sweeping statements as fact, these are almost always oversimplified and misleading.

 

" lower numbers don't cure heart disease. " - they can however prevent it as well as prevent devastating stroke

 

Normal or near normal PSA reading does not mean no need for prostate medication, that would depend on how symptomatic you are without medication  (difficulty with urination).  Lopress (prazosin) does indeed lower BP so if you were to stop it yours would likely rise, possibly way too much. If you stop it you may find it necessary to then take something else for BP. And, of course, the urinary difficulty you started it for may recur.

 

If you lose a little weight your BP may improve, especially if it is now just borderline high. It will not do anything for the other health issues mentioned.  Cutting down the coffee would also help your BP (or maybe mix it with decaf 1/2 and 1/2?).

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, muskoka said:

 

I am 70 this year, 5 months ago I was diagnosed with a heart condition and high blood pressure which I have had off and on for decades. The list of drugs I was issued was shocking, but I went along with them (3 different heart specialists) for a while. Due to bad side effects and a lot of research I have eliminated them all except a mini aspirin daily. The last one I dropped was Atenalol (generic for Prenolol) two weeks ago. My blood pressure spiked for 3-4 days after, then settled back to more normal levels. 

 

Here is how out of touch many doctors are as all 3 of them confirmed I should continue taking Atenalol (generic for Prenolol) when research has proved it kills more than it cures. I am using lifestyle changes instead of drugs, not saying this is the right thing to do but it is my choice.

 

 

 

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15530629

 

We are on our own and must do our own research IMO.

 

Doug

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Always good to do your own research. But in a case like this I would also suggest changing doctors and putting a lot of research into doctor selection.  Atenolol has not been  recommended as initial treatment for hypertension for about a decade now.

 

This is a good overview of current recommendations  https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127/chapter/1-Guidance#initiating-and-monitoring-antihypertensive-drug-treatment-including-blood-pressure-targets-2

Posted

after having a new wife,i had to have a double by-pass and a new aota heart valve.still on meds.for life.

so i see you to have had a new wife :smile: HMMMMMMMM.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, laislica said:

At 75, things that were easy at 40 seem a lot more difficult now!

 

21 hours ago, laislica said:

However, my GP prescribed 100mg Atenalol and the numbers fell from 139/95 ....

 

My BP hasn't been that low in 20 years, and I'm 61 now.

 

At 75 my father had been dead for 3 years and my mother for 9.

 

You're doing well.

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, meatboy said:

after having a new wife,i had to have a double by-pass and a new aota heart valve.still on meds.for life.

so i see you to have had a new wife :smile: HMMMMMMMM.

he he, we passed our fourth anniversary last month.

Is that new enough?

It's a begger getting old is it not LOL

Good luck with the new bits, I suppose it's anti rejection drugs and nowt you can do about that.

It's not that I am against Dr's, veggies ain't gonna fix a broken leg !!!

It's the unfair manipulation of the medical profession by the big companies that I am against!

All the best to you.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, KittenKong said:

 

 

My BP hasn't been that low in 20 years, and I'm 61 now.

 

At 75 my father had been dead for 3 years and my mother for 9.

 

You're doing well.

 

Thank you.

All my Mum's family died by mid 50's but she made it to 86!

She asked me why she was still alive.

I said, just to show her children that we didn't have to worry about dying early.

I remember that at about 49, she was very sad and depressed because she thought that her death was imminent.....

 

I have studied nutrition and health for about 45 years. I created a database in 78 of the nutritional values in most common foods.

 

In my 40's I had a stressful job, worked long hours and had acid reflux like you would not believe.

I took milk of magnesia several times a day but after a while I realised that the anti acids only suppressed the symptoms and long term use does actual harm.

I read up on food combining and changed my eating habits and in a week the problem had gone!

The fix was simple.

The stomach has to be extremely acid to allow the enzyme to process protein so one part of the fix was to increase the acid, not reduce it.

There is a valve at the top of the stomach and it closes if the stomach acid is strong enough.

If the level is low say PH 4 or 5 it stays open.

This allows the reflux and that lower level of acid is quite strong enough to burn the tissue in the esophagus!

 

Just another example of a "Natural Cure",  and actually showing pharma drugs as the villain....

Probably just quackery though eh?

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Sheryl said:

 

Always good to do your own research. But in a case like this I would also suggest changing doctors and putting a lot of research into doctor selection.  Atenolol has not been  recommended as initial treatment for hypertension for about a decade now.

 

This is a good overview of current recommendations  https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127/chapter/1-Guidance#initiating-and-monitoring-antihypertensive-drug-treatment-including-blood-pressure-targets-2

I am not blaming you Sheryl, but my case has been reviewed 3 times by 3 different heart specialists since October last year (4 months, 3 specialists) - the last one was recommended by you at Ram in another thread. They all recommended I continue taking Atenolol!!!

 

Damn drug pushers who either don't do their homework or only care about kick-backs from over prescribing.

 

Doug

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, muskoka said:

I am not blaming you Sheryl, but my case has been reviewed 3 times by 3 different heart specialists since October last year (4 months, 3 specialists) - the last one was recommended by you at Ram in another thread. They all recommended I continue taking Atenolol!!!

 

Damn drug pushers who either don't do their homework or only care about kick-backs from over prescribing.

 

Doug

 

 

 

 

That may be a tad harsh.

 

If the Dr was not taught anything other than knowing what pill to prescribe, what else can he/she do?

 

That is one of my strong points:

Nutrition and lifestyle should be firsl and drugs last!

 

PS

 

The link is to a UK NHS report

 

 

 

Edited by laislica
  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, muskoka said:

I am not blaming you Sheryl, but my case has been reviewed 3 times by 3 different heart specialists since October last year (4 months, 3 specialists) - the last one was recommended by you at Ram in another thread. They all recommended I continue taking Atenolol!!!

 

Damn drug pushers who either don't do their homework or only care about kick-backs from over prescribing.

 

Doug

 

 

While you are very sensible to want to be prescribed another drug, the paper you referred to does not say what you think it says.

 

It compares atenolol to other active treatments, and says that atenolol is the worst. It does not say that  no treatment at all is better than taking atenolol, and in fact says the studies show that when atenolol is compared with placebo, the risk of stroke is decreased.

 

So while atenolol seems ineffective compared to other drugs it is not worse than no drug at all:  I would rather not have a stroke than have one, even if the stroke doesn't kill me (that is even if the drug has no effect on mortality)!

 

A lot of the conspiracy theory stuff that will be aired on here is likely irrelevant - the overprescription of outmoded drugs is a reflection of the lack of continuing GP education and reliance on familiar treatments.

 

New drugs, especially on-patent drugs are much more profitable and Pharma pushes those in preference to pushing old generic ones (atenolol 1976). 

 

Even wiki uses atenolol as an example of physician resistance to change in prescription habits which clinical research has already established as desirable:

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenolol

"Atenolol has been given as an example of how slow healthcare providers are to change their prescribing practices in the face of medical evidence that indicates that a drug is ineffective.[10] In 2012, 33.8 million prescriptions were written to American patients for this drug.[10] In 2014, it was in the top (most common) 1% of drugs prescribed to Medicare patients.[10] Although the number of prescriptions has been declining steadily since the evidence against its efficacy was published, it has been estimated that it would take 20 years for doctors to stop prescribing it for hypertension.[10]"

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, mommysboy said:

I'm not sure you ever had high blood pressure enough to warrant medication. 

 

 

 

As I mentioned, the nurse at work said it was marginal....

 

Having got it back in my late 50's, I then retired, drank more and gained a lot of weight.

Then it was in the 160-170 / 100-120 and the difference between sys and dia was 60!

So according to any guideline, I definitely got there!

 

I guess that if I get my body fat below 25%, then it might be low enough, whatever it is....

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, laislica said:

As I mentioned, the nurse at work said it was marginal....

 

Having got it back in my late 50's, I then retired, drank more and gained a lot of weight.

Then it was in the 160-170 / 100-120 and the difference between sys and dia was 60!

So according to any guideline, I definitely got there!

 

I guess that if I get my body fat below 25%, then it might be low enough, whatever it is....

 

 

 

Yes, that's high blood pressure.

 

Mine zips around here and there without rhyme and reason.

 

Walking is a great exercise if you can manage the time, and it doesn't need to be strenuous.

 

You're cutting out some very important foods here: foods that we arguably need, and that satisfy hunger.

 

Any diet that does not satisfy is doomed to failure imo. 

Edited by mommysboy
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, partington said:

While you are very sensible to want to be prescribed another drug, the paper you referred to does not say what you think it says.

 

It compares atenolol to other active treatments, and says that atenolol is the worst. It does not say that  no treatment at all is better than taking atenolol, and in fact says the studies show that when atenolol is compared with placebo, the risk of stroke is decreased.

 

So while atenolol seems ineffective compared to other drugs it is not worse than no drug at all:  I would rather not have a stroke than have one, even if the stroke doesn't kill me (that is even if the drug has no effect on mortality)!

 

A lot of the conspiracy theory stuff that will be aired on here is likely irrelevant - the overprescription of outmoded drugs is a reflection of the lack of continuing GP education and reliance on familiar treatments.

 

New drugs, especially on-patent drugs are much more profitable and Pharma pushes those in preference to pushing old generic ones (atenolol 1976). 

 

Even wiki uses atenolol as an example of physician resistance to change in prescription habits which clinical research has already established as desirable:

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenolol

"Atenolol has been given as an example of how slow healthcare providers are to change their prescribing practices in the face of medical evidence that indicates that a drug is ineffective.[10] In 2012, 33.8 million prescriptions were written to American patients for this drug.[10] In 2014, it was in the top (most common) 1% of drugs prescribed to Medicare patients.[10] Although the number of prescriptions has been declining steadily since the evidence against its efficacy was published, it has been estimated that it would take 20 years for doctors to stop prescribing it for hypertension.[10]"

 

Agreed, here is an interesting article.

 

https://www.propublica.org/article/when-evidence-says-no-but-doctors-say-yes

 

When Evidence Says No, But Doctors Say Yes
Years after research contradicts common practices, patients continue to demand them and doctors continue to deliver.

The result is an epidemic of unnecessary and unhelpful treatment.

 

My real question is:

Why do the medical universities not teach about nutrition and lifestyle?

 

I notice that there are many Internet Grus offering health advice and quite a lot of it actually works.

But they are called Quacks......

 

Back in the 20's-40's William Howard Hay's book was a bible that worked (well it did for my Mum)

but today, food combining is regarded as quackery by many, but I used it to fix my GERD!

 

 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, mommysboy said:

Yes, that's high blood pressure.

 

Mine zips around here and there without rhyme and reason.

 

Walking is a great exercise if you can manage the time, and it doesn't need to be strenuous.

 

You're cutting out some very important foods here: foods that we arguably need, and that satisfy hunger.

 

Any diet that does not satisfy is doomed to failure imo. 

 

Agreed with the walking and I try to do some daily (except for the tropical heat/humidity and the mozzies when it's dark and cooler).

I find my BP reduces somewhat after exercise.

 

Ten years ago I would have agreed with you: Any diet that does not satisfy is doomed to failure

 

However, This time I have stuck to this low carb regime for almost half a year and I no longer crave them.

It has been hard to give up the wheat based carbs especially!

I'd say, at least as hard as giving up cigarettes.

 

With the cigs, I finally cut them out completely, but you can't do that with food.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Atenolol has been off patent for eons, doctors still prescribing it is not due to profit motive.

 

More likely failure to keep up with the professional literature.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, partington said:

While you are very sensible to want to be prescribed another drug, the paper you referred to does not say what you think it says.

 

It compares atenolol to other active treatments, and says that atenolol is the worst. It does not say that  no treatment at all is better than taking atenolol, and in fact says the studies show that when atenolol is compared with placebo, the risk of stroke is decreased.

 

So while atenolol seems ineffective compared to other drugs it is not worse than no drug at all:  I would rather not have a stroke than have one, even if the stroke doesn't kill me (that is even if the drug has no effect on mortality)!

 

A lot of the conspiracy theory stuff that will be aired on here is likely irrelevant - the overprescription of outmoded drugs is a reflection of the lack of continuing GP education and reliance on familiar treatments.

 

New drugs, especially on-patent drugs are much more profitable and Pharma pushes those in preference to pushing old generic ones (atenolol 1976). 

 

Even wiki uses atenolol as an example of physician resistance to change in prescription habits which clinical research has already established as desirable:

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenolol

"Atenolol has been given as an example of how slow healthcare providers are to change their prescribing practices in the face of medical evidence that indicates that a drug is ineffective.[10] In 2012, 33.8 million prescriptions were written to American patients for this drug.[10] In 2014, it was in the top (most common) 1% of drugs prescribed to Medicare patients.[10] Although the number of prescriptions has been declining steadily since the evidence against its efficacy was published, it has been estimated that it would take 20 years for doctors to stop prescribing it for hypertension.[10]"

 

From the same Wikipedia link...

 

Quote

Antihypertensive therapy with atenolol provides weaker protective action against cardiovascular complications (e.g. myocardial infarction and stroke) compared to other antihypertensive drugs. In some cases, diuretics are superior.[5] In addition, atenolol has been found to lack mortality benefits[6][7] and even to increase mortality in older adults.[2]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenolol

 

thus my previous comment Atenolol kills more people than it cures.

 

Quote

Atenolol use was related to increased mortality in community-dwelling hypertensive Older adults. This increase in mortality risk seems to be related to an increase of pulse arterial pressure.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23581644

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, muskoka said:

 

From the same Wikipedia link...

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenolol

 

thus my previous comment Atenolol kills more people than it cures.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23581644

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That's fine-I was talking about the one paper you quoted-these ones suggest there could be a mortality effect I agree.  Certainly atenolol isn't a good drug.

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

My number one rule is: never allow a doctor to take my blood pressure! I'm sure most of you will have heard of the 'white coat syndrome', whereby ones B/P elevates solely due to the anxiety of being there having it taken.

 

I have my own, good quality, German made monitor and check mine about once a week.

 

I am 71 and my average readings are 136/80. I put this down to healthy eating, plenty of fruit, veggies chicken and fish. Very little red meat and only a small amount of carbs. Careful with the alcohol and definitely no smoking.

 

A daily routine of regular exercise. Nothing drastic, I hate gyms! Swimming, walking and Qigong are my favourites. Meditation is also very cool. I have proven that a 20 minute morning session will bring down the B/P by a couple of points.

 

Personally I believe we should take responsibility for our own health. No doctor knows me as well as I do!

 

Good luck and good health OP.

Excellent post.

 

Yes my bp shoots up in the presence of a white coat and medical paraphenalia.:smile:

 

 

Posted

I have just returned from my evening walk, which reminded me of a TV programme I'd seen on the BBC a while back. I thought I might share this story with this group.

 

This was a medical series and the research doctor who headed it up was on a mission to encourage patients to reduce their dependence on medications.

 

In one of the episodes, he gathered a group of about 20 patients all of whom had at least one of these 3 common ailments. Hypertension, high cholesterol. or T2 diabetes. Some had more than one.

 

He recorded all of their readings and then had them carry out this simple exercise regime. He had them walk for 30 minutes per day, 5 days a week, for 1 month. They walked in groups to encourage each other.

 

At the end of the period he took their readings once again. Every single one of them showed improvements in their condition, some to the degree that they felt confident enough to withdraw from medication all together.

 

The doctor believes that these issues are not medical conditions at all, they are lifestyle related conditions. The message is clear don't you think?

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, laislica said:

he he, we passed our fourth anniversary last month.

Is that new enough?

It's a begger getting old is it not LOL

Good luck with the new bits, I suppose it's anti rejection drugs and nowt you can do about that.

It's not that I am against Dr's, veggies ain't gonna fix a broken leg !!!

It's the unfair manipulation of the medical profession by the big companies that I am against!

All the best to you.

 

ONLY 4YRS your still on honeymoon.we have just past our 27th.anniversary and i wont see 71again.

getting old frightens me as i am enjoying my life.i have made 2short visits,but i was sent back[not ready]

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...