Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

3 Men Face Same-Day Execution as US Death Penalty Use Rises

Three men convicted of murder in different US states are scheduled to be executed on Thursday, bringing into focus a sharp rise in capital punishment across the country.

After a 16-year gap in which three people were not executed on the same day, Anthony Darrell Hines, 66, is due to die in Tennessee. Jeremy Williams, 41, is set to be executed in Alabama, and Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez, 71, faces execution in Oklahoma. All three are scheduled to be killed by lethal injection, though it remains unclear whether the executions will proceed without last-minute legal intervention.

Planned executions and legal uncertainty

Hines, who has maintained his innocence for four years and is bedridden, is due to be executed in Tennessee under the same protocol that failed 12 weeks earlier when Tony Von Carruthers was due to receive lethal injection.

Tennessee Governor Bill Lee later granted Carruthers a one-year reprieve after the attempt, following witness accounts that the man showed signs of severe distress during the process. Lee said the execution was not botched and that a doctor was unable to establish intravenous access.

In Alabama, Williams is expected to be the state’s first execution of 2026. He was convicted of the rape and murder of a five-year-old girl in 2021. Williams has dismissed his lawyers and has volunteered to be put to death. Alabama Governor Kay Ivey has said she does not plan to grant clemency.

In Oklahoma, Cuesta-Rodriguez is also scheduled for Thursday’s lethal injection. He has asked for no clemency and no mercy for the murder of a woman in 2003, with experts saying his age increases the risk of a botched execution.

How the death penalty use has accelerated

The executions are taking place as the US records a steep increase in the number of people put to death. In 2025, there were 47 executions across 11 states, up from 25 in 2024. Overall, the number was more than four times higher than in 2021, even as juries and public opinion have become increasingly wary of capital punishment.

A key factor is the way federal and state authorities have used their powers to move cases forward. In the federal system, President Donald Trump ended a nearly two-decade moratorium on the death penalty during his first term, ordering 13 executions over six months in 2020. That moratorium was later reinstated under President Joe Biden.

On the first day of Trump’s second term in 2025, he signed an executive order re-instating the death penalty. No federal executions have been carried out since the order was signed, according to the article, but it encourages states to seek the death penalty for every federal crime in which a law enforcement officer is killed, and directs the attorney general to ensure states have sufficient drugs for lethal injections.

The US Department of Justice also expanded its execution protocols, including additional methods such as firing squads, and readopted lethal injections. The department said in April that it had streamlined internal processes to speed up death penalty cases.

Amnesty International USA said the full effect of these measures may not be seen for years because of the time taken by appeals after a conviction.

Florida and policy changes at state level

Executions in 2025 were heavily concentrated in Florida, which accounted for about 40% of the deaths. Just over halfway through 2026, 12 of the 19 planned executions occurred in Florida, making it a major driver of the national rise.

The Death Penalty Information Center said the state’s outsize role reflects changes championed by Republican Governor Ron DeSantis. In 2023, Florida reduced the number of jurors required to recommend death in the trial phase from a unanimous 12 to eight. The state also made sexual battery on a minor under 12 eligible as a capital offence.

Because governors can sign death warrants for prisoners with no further appeals without court oversight, Florida has been described as uniquely positioned to carry out executions. Pennsylvania has a similar process but has not executed anyone since 1999.

Growing concern over executions and support

Debate in the US has also focused on how executions are carried out. Pharmaceutical companies have opposed the use of their products for the death penalty, leading to shortages of drugs for lethal injection. In 2025, South Carolina began using firing squads due to the shortage.

Non-governmental monitoring groups have reported problems with execution procedures. The Death Penalty Information Center said an estimated 3% of executions from 1890 to 2010 were botched, with lethal injection having the highest rate. It also said that in 2022, more than a third of executions were botched or highly problematic.

Support for the death penalty has been weakening. A Gallup poll found 52% of Americans say it is morally acceptable, the lowest level since the 1970s. At the same time, fewer death sentences are being issued: juries handed down more than 300 death sentences a year in the 1990s, but in 2025 they issued only 23.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

13 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

WDSmart Platinum Member

WDSmart

Advanced Member

Two White and one Black...

novacova Star Member

novacova

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Yes. The continued use of the death penalty in a so-called civilised country is very sad.

Though personally am opposed to capital punishment in most cases, it is used as a psychological a deterrent in attempt to maintain civility in civilized countries, a good example is China where it is quick and effective. BTW, in which (un)-civilized country do you choose to reside?

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member

If the three prisoners gave been proved 100% to be murderers, something quite simple with the advancements of DNA and forensic science in general, then execution is understandable. They didn't stop to think when they were ending someone's life.

The UK should follow suit. So many convicted murderers, mass rapists, pedos in UK prisons that have nothing to give to society and are costing the tax payer millions to be kept alive.

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, oslooskar said:

Brewsterbudgen, calling something “complete nonsense” does not make it so. If you think my statement about the erosion of freedom of speech in the UK is wrong, then refute it rather than simply dismissing it.

Nor is it irrelevant. You were the one who introduced the notion of what constitutes a “civilised country.” I would say that the freedom to express unpopular, controversial, and even offensive opinions without fear of criminal prosecution is one of the fundamental measures of a free and civilised society.

You may find the execution of convicted murderers evidence of an uncivilised society. I find the prosecution of people for expressing opinions far more disturbing. We can disagree about which represents the greater threat to a civilised society, but waving away the latter as “complete nonsense” is hardly a convincing argument.

It's complete nonsense as it's not true. And this thread is about the death penalty. There are literally hundreds of threads debating UK politics, so feel free to start another one in the appropriate forum.

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, novacova said:

Though personally am opposed to capital punishment in most cases, it is used as a psychological a deterrent in attempt to maintain civility in civilized countries, a good example is China where it is quick and effective. BTW, in which (un)-civilized country do you choose to reside?

I'm British but currently living in Thailand.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
24 minutes ago, novacova said:

Same, from the US.

Singapore retains the highest execution rate in SEA and has the lowest crime rate, and it’s a highly civilized country.

Per capita. Highest execution rate is countries like Saudi Arabia and China.

novacova Star Member

novacova

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Per capita. Highest execution rate is countries like Saudi Arabia and China.

Those countries are not in SEA. Go figure…

SingAPorn Gold Member

SingAPorn

Advanced Member

Not surprising,...who said the American Criminal Justice system was civilized '

unblocktheplanet Star Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, oslooskar said:

Brewsterbudgen, calling something “complete nonsense” does not make it so. If you think my statement about the erosion of freedom of speech in the UK is wrong, then refute it rather than simply dismissing it.

Nor is it irrelevant. You were the one who introduced the notion of what constitutes a “civilised country.” I would say that the freedom to express unpopular, controversial, and even offensive opinions without fear of criminal prosecution is one of the fundamental measures of a free and civilised society.

You may find the execution of convicted murderers evidence of an uncivilised society. I find the prosecution of people for expressing opinions far more disturbing. We can disagree about which represents the greater threat to a civilised society, but waving away the latter as “complete nonsense” is hardly a convincing argument.

Sure. But freedom of speech has nothing to do with the death penalty, does it?

oslooskar Silver Member

oslooskar

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

It's complete nonsense as it's not true. And this thread is about the death penalty. There are literally hundreds of threads debating UK politics, so feel free to start another one in the appropriate forum.

Brewsterbudgen, you have now said twice that what I wrote is “complete nonsense,” but you still haven't explained what is untrue about it. Repeating an assertion is not evidence. If you believe that freedom of speech has not been eroded in the UK, then by all means explain why and support your position.

As for relevance, you introduced the broader question of whether a country that retains capital punishment deserves to be called “civilised.” Therefore, once you make that argument, it is perfectly reasonable to point out that there are other measures by which a society might be judged civilised, including its willingness to tolerate speech that is unpopular, offensive, or objectionable.

You cannot broaden the discussion from capital punishment to the supposed civilisation of the country practising it, and then declare another measure of civilisation “off topic” simply because you don't wish to discuss it.

If you want to restrict the discussion strictly to capital punishment, that's fine. But in that case, perhaps arguments about whether the United States is a “so-called civilised country” should also be left out of it.

oslooskar Silver Member

oslooskar

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Sure. But freedom of speech has nothing to do with the death penalty, does it?

No, not directly. The connection arose because Brewsterbudgen went beyond simply opposing the death penalty and invoked the broader question of what constitutes a “civilised country.”

Once that standard is introduced, other characteristics of a civilized society become relevant. I happen to regard freedom of speech as one of the most fundamental of them.

Had Brewsterbudgen simply said, “I oppose the death penalty,” there would have been no reason for me to mention freedom of speech at all.

SiSePuede419 Ruby Member

SiSePuede419

Advanced Member

3 Men Face Same-Day Execution as US Death Penalty Use Rises

Yeah, I've seen videos of Same-Day Executions carried out by ICE (Institute of Cruel Evil).

Remarkable efficient!

Judge, Jury, Executioner and Online Influencer all rolled into one...

Overweight guy with a mask, gun and a badge with no markings they bought online. 🫪

oslooskar Silver Member

oslooskar

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

13 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Two want no clemency, meaning the prisoners are more honourable than the state putting them to death.

That is an astonishing standard of “honour.” One of the condemned men you are describing as “more honourable than the state” raped and murdered a five-year-old girl.

Think about what you are actually saying. A man does something unimaginably cruel to a defenseless child, and because he later declines to ask for clemency, you elevate him above the society that convicted and sentenced him?

Refusing clemency does not erase what he did, restore his victim's life, or confer some newfound moral superiority upon him. Whatever your views on capital punishment, and there are perfectly legitimate arguments against it, portraying the rapist and murderer of a five-year-old child as morally superior to the state because he is willing to accept his sentence is a truly remarkable definition of “honour.” In fact, it's delusional.

oslooskar Silver Member

oslooskar

Advanced Member
17 hours ago, Purdey said:

Since the introduction of the death penalty, I have not noticed that any country has had zero murders on any year. Execution does not seem to frighten murderers.

It appears that America just enjoys killing people.

Your argument makes very little sense. No serious person claims that the death penalty will reduce murder to zero. Prison sentences haven't eliminated robbery, rape, or assault either. By your reasoning, we would have to conclude that those punishments have no deterrent effect simply because those crimes still occur.

Whether capital punishment actually deters murder is a legitimate question, and the evidence is disputed. But “murders still happen, therefore execution frightens nobody” does not answer it.

As for “America just enjoys killing people,” that is an absurd generalization about a country of more than 300 million people, many of whom strongly oppose the death penalty. Supporting capital punishment for the most atrocious murders is not the same thing as enjoying killing people.

You can oppose the death penalty without caricaturing everyone who disagrees with you as bloodthirsty.

novacova Star Member

novacova

Advanced Member
16 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Yes, but it is also well known for being heavy-handed or restrictive regarding certain civil liberties, free speech, and political dissent. Not somewhere I would chose to live.

Thailand doesn’t rank very high on the civil liberties index either especially when it comes to crossing red lines, yet you choose to live here. Having the liberty to express freedom inherently has consequences, in order to suppress some of those consequences, then freedoms and liberties will be restricted. Can’t have it both ways as human nature won’t allow it, we are what we are and fortunately folks such as ourselves have the options to pretty much live where we please, for better or worse. Though personally as far as political freedoms, it would make no difference to me whether living in th or Singapore as having no interest in being involved in any of it, as the wife would put it “not your business”.

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
38 minutes ago, novacova said:

Thailand doesn’t rank very high on the civil liberties index either especially when it comes to crossing red lines, yet you choose to live here. Having the liberty to express freedom inherently has consequences, in order to suppress some of those consequences, then freedoms and liberties will be restricted. Can’t have it both ways as human nature won’t allow it, we are what we are and fortunately folks such as ourselves have the options to pretty much live where we please, for better or worse. Though personally as far as political freedoms, it would make no difference to me whether living in th or Singapore as having no interest in being involved in any of it, as the wife would put it “not your business”.

I completely agree about Thailand. I work here so not really much of a choice, although I remain careful to behave myself and definitely do not get involved in Thai politics, unlike when I lived in the UK.

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, oslooskar said:

Brewsterbudgen, you have now said twice that what I wrote is “complete nonsense,” but you still haven't explained what is untrue about it. Repeating an assertion is not evidence. If you believe that freedom of speech has not been eroded in the UK, then by all means explain why and support your position.

As for relevance, you introduced the broader question of whether a country that retains capital punishment deserves to be called “civilised.” Therefore, once you make that argument, it is perfectly reasonable to point out that there are other measures by which a society might be judged civilised, including its willingness to tolerate speech that is unpopular, offensive, or objectionable.

You cannot broaden the discussion from capital punishment to the supposed civilisation of the country practising it, and then declare another measure of civilisation “off topic” simply because you don't wish to discuss it.

If you want to restrict the discussion strictly to capital punishment, that's fine. But in that case, perhaps arguments about whether the United States is a “so-called civilised country” should also be left out of it.

Sorry, but if you really believe that people in the UK can no longer express "unpopular or offensive opinions" you will need to show proof. Try looking at X and you'll find plenty of them!

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.