Iran Accused of Firing Missiles at Israel Amid Truce

9 minutes ago, webfact said:

In comments reported by Reuters and posted on X, he said Iranian assets were “neither war spoils for Washington nor a payment fund for its allies”.

Unfortunately, they are in the eyes of a friendless, war-mongering demagogue.

OK, he has one friend.

What truce? I see no truce..

Trump has failed big time and doesn't deserve any deal.

5 hours ago, webfact said:

Reports that Iran fired missiles at Israel on Sunday have raised fresh concerns over the stability of a fragile ceasefire between Washington and Tehran.

Get today's headlines by email

The reported missile launches came after Iran's parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, accused the United States of violating the ceasefire through its naval blockade and its actions related to Lebanon.

In a post on X, Ghalibaf said the US blockade and what he described as breaches of agreements concerning Lebanon amounted to violations of the truce. He added that American and Israeli assets and bases in the region had become “legitimate targets”.

Trump Briefed on Renewed Fighting

The White House confirmed that President Donald Trump had been briefed on reports of renewed hostilities after Iran allegedly launched a missile at Israel for the first time since the ceasefire took effect. Axios first reported the briefing.

CNBC said it could not independently verify the missile launches. However, the Associated Press reported that Israel said Iran had fired missiles toward its territory. The Israel Defense Forces said it had activated defensive systems after detecting incoming missiles.

Speaking to Fox News, Trump said the reported attacks were “certainly not going to help negotiations”.

Efforts to Prevent Escalation

According to Axios, Trump was expected to speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an effort to discourage retaliatory military action against Iran.

The ceasefire between the United States and Iran has been in place since early April. However, ongoing clashes involving Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon have complicated diplomatic efforts to preserve the truce and reach a broader agreement.

Disputes Over Lebanon and Nuclear Demands

Iran has called for an end to fighting in Lebanon and the lifting of US restrictions on its ports and shipping. Washington, meanwhile, is seeking guarantees that Tehran will surrender its nuclear material and permanently abandon any effort to acquire nuclear weapons.

Reports that the Trump administration is considering using Iranian assets to help fund reconstruction in allied Gulf states have also sparked a response from Tehran.

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi rejected the idea, saying regional governments were not entitled to seek reparations from Iran. In comments reported by Reuters and posted on X, he said Iranian assets were “neither war spoils for Washington nor a payment fund for its allies”.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 8 June 2026

View full article

They (Iran) need to have a nuclear bomb, just to stop the Israelis from further genocide and war crimes.

The Israelis have said their truce will continue in between shots!

Israel doesn’t want a deal so the attack on Beirut was a deliberate attempt to get Iran to respond. They may regret it though.

You know if we look back at this day in history in 2046 or 2056, this news article will be of little significance to the vast majority of people on Earth.

Perspective. 👍

should read...IRAN retaliated AFTER israel fired at a beirut suburb!..

If Trump calls it off now, he loses the mid terms, any dreams of another term in office and avoiding prosecution and possibly jail.

If Netanyahu calls it off now, he loses the election, his trial for corruption can proceed and he will possibly end up in jail.

15 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

You know if we look back at this day in history in 2046 or 2056, this news article will be of little significance to the vast majority of people on Earth.

Perspective. 👍

If I'm able to look back from either 2046 or 2056, it will be a miracle.

Reality.

Well that went well. Trumps been back heeled by BIBI and ignored his warning Israel not to. of course this was ignored, as Sirens sound again in major Gulf states. Iran sends missiles to Beirut surprisingly as Trump said many times he smashed them all.

Whitehouse admits it miscalculated in this war.

https://www.ms.now/al-sharpton/politicsnation/watch/white-house-official-iran-negotiations-exposed-some-fundamental-miscalculations-from-trump-2502824515604

Whitehouse now pleading with Israel not to strike back.

7 hours ago, AustinRacing said:

Israel doesn’t want a deal so the attack on Beirut was a deliberate attempt to get Iran to respond. They may regret it though.

Interestingly the Lebanese don't want Hezbollah in Lebanon (except the Shias) and the Iranians want to be freed from the tyranny of Islamic fundamentalists. The same Islamic fundamentalist of which Hezbollah are a proxy terrorist organisation. Fundamentalism of any sort is bad but IMHO Islamic fundamentalists are without doubt the worst.

Ceasefire??

Where? When? Who?

8 hours ago, Zapitapi said:

should read...IRAN retaliated AFTER israel fired at a beirut suburb!..

Beirut isn't in Iran though .

Why should Iran retaliate ?

Nothing to do with them

8 hours ago, NanLaew said:

If I'm able to look back from either 2046 or 2056, it will be a miracle.

Reality.

Its 19.23 now, so just an hour and halfs wait

Trump claimed that despite the renewed fighting, negotiations with Iran should move "quickly," unless "ignorance or stupidity" get in the way.

Hold on. You have just described yourself, Hegseth, and Netanyahu in a nutshell, so of course ignorance and stupidity are going to get in the way, because the three chief proponents manifest those qualities in abundance.

14 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Interestingly the Lebanese don't want Hezbollah in Lebanon (except the Shias) and the Iranians want to be freed from the tyranny of Islamic fundamentalists. The same Islamic fundamentalist of which Hezbollah are a proxy terrorist organisation. Fundamentalism of any sort is bad but IMHO Islamic fundamentalists are without doubt the worst.

Fair enough. But hezbollah was created by Lebanese to stop Israel from expanding its territory into Lebanon. They’ve been quite effective. “Proxy terrorist organization” talking point has lost its luster as it’s been demonstrated the other side has done and continues to commit worse atrocities.