Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Record El Niño raises risk of extreme global weather

The Met Office has warned that the El Niño weather pattern developing over the Pacific Ocean is likely to be the strongest in living memory, with implications for global temperatures and the risk of extreme weather.

El Niño events can push up average temperatures worldwide and can alter rainfall and wind patterns across the globe. The Met Office said the effects of human-driven climate change, alongside El Niño, make it “very likely” that 2027 will be the warmest year on record.

There is already evidence that the changing climate patterns associated with El Niño are taking hold, including below-average monsoon rainfall in India and lower hurricane activity in the Atlantic.

The Met Office also warned that the UK could face a higher chance of a wet and stormy autumn as the event develops.

What Met Office Forecasts Suggest

The Met Office said sea-surface temperature anomalies across a key region of the Pacific are currently well above normal, with measurements showing levels more than 2C higher than average. Forecasts indicate the anomalies could rise beyond 3C later this year as El Niño approaches its peak.

The Met Office’s forecasts suggest this would be unprecedented in temperature records dating back to 1950, and could be the most intense event since the 19th century.

The warning comes as warmer conditions deeper in the ocean may add to the strength of the episode. In some places, temperatures at around 100m (330ft) in the Pacific are about 8C above average, providing additional heat that can help reinforce the event.

Prof Adam Scaife, head of long-range forecasting at the Met Office, said the signal in forecasts has been exceptionally strong, adding: “I have never seen an El Niño signal this intense in our forecasts.”

How El Niño Works

El Niño is a naturally occurring climate pattern that typically appears every two to seven years and lasts for around a year. It is linked to changes in Pacific trade winds, which usually blow from east to west.

During El Niño, these winds can weaken or reverse, allowing warm surface water to spread eastwards. As heat is released from the ocean into the atmosphere, global temperatures rise and rainfall patterns shift.

Scientists identify an El Niño when sea-surface temperatures in the central Pacific are at least 0.5C above average. Current measurements are well beyond that threshold, according to the Met Office.

In comments reported by the Met Office, Dr Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at Berkeley Earth, said the ongoing development over coming months has increased confidence the event could be record-setting. Other climate groups have projected an even stronger outcome, potentially reaching around 4C above average.

Hausfather said it is possible, though not certain, that the event could be among the most intense El Niños for centuries, adding that evidence for such comparisons becomes increasingly difficult further back in time.

Impacts Seen Around the World

El Niño does not affect every region in the same way, and impacts can differ from one event to the next. However, the Met Office said there are signs that influences are already being felt.

It pointed to suppressed southwest monsoon rainfall in South Asia, with 2026 running well below normal. It also said shifts in wind patterns in the Caribbean and tropical Atlantic can reduce hurricane activity, with only three named storms recorded so far this season.

In areas near the tropical Pacific, the Met Office said El Niño can contribute to drought and bushfire risk in Australia, while also increasing the threat of flooding in parts of Peru, Ecuador and the southern United States.

What It Could Mean for the UK

The Met Office said El Niño is not thought to be a major driver of the record-breaking heatwaves seen this summer. It suggested the pattern could have greater influence on weather later in the year.

It said the risk of wetter and stormier conditions could increase across north-west Europe during autumn and early winter, including the UK. It also noted that El Niño can affect the odds of cold weather later in winter, although the link is described as less clear.

2027 “Very Likely” Hottest Year

During El Niño, heat released from the ocean into the atmosphere can raise global average temperatures, particularly in the calendar year following the winter peak of the event. Dr Nick Dunstone, a climate scientist at the Met Office, said this makes 2027 “very likely” to replace 2024 as the warmest year on record.

Earlier this month, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization warned that El Niño could threaten tens of millions of people in at-risk countries with crisis-level acute food insecurity.


Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

21 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Roadsternut Platinum Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

Maybe you should consider what your side suggested, eating babies. Thats how serious (lunatic) your side is. Luckily I can live a life with no worry about climate scares and fearmongering.

You can keep on writing about the green scam and keep your ”win” if that makes your little ego feel good 👍🏻

If the topic has no interest for you, you're not worried about anything, why are you burning the AI machine so hot. Congratulations on getting off the AI.

About time to send you to Coventry. I tire of you.

kwilco Ruby Member

kwilco

Advanced Member
19 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

I can admit being wrong unlike many forum climate "scientists".

I admit I gave you wrong advise buying a Tesla. Seems it's not right thing to do.

you mean "Swasticar"?

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member
12 hours ago, kwilco said:

you mean "Swasticar"?

You mean the car that’s outselling every other EV while people like you still think ‘Swasticar’ is peak wit? Cute and so childish.

Great car.


I choose that before eating babies what your lot is suggesting. It makes also a lot of people enjoy life again like disabled, blind and elderly people.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
On 8/22/2026 at 11:32 PM, FinChin67 said:

Yes.

Paul Ehrlich (Stanford biologist) — Repeated 1960s–1970s predictions of massive famines and hundreds of millions starving in the 1970s–1980s due to population and environmental limits. Food production rose instead (Green Revolution).

Kenneth Watt (ecologist) — 1970 Earth Day claim that the world would be about 4°C colder by 1990 and 11°C colder by 2000 if trends continued.

Various 1970s scientists — Multiple researchers and media reports around 1970 predicted a coming ice age or significant cooling by 2000. Warming occurred.

James Hansen (NASA) — 1988 congressional testimony scenarios; the high-emission pathway overpredicted subsequent warming. Later specific comments on rapid Greenland melt and sea-level implications have not matched the timelines suggested.

Wieslaw Maslowski (U.S. Navy researcher) and related extrapolations — Early 2000s claims (widely amplified) of possible ice-free Arctic summers within a decade or by ~2013–2016. September Arctic sea ice has declined but has not disappeared.

Individual researchers / media-amplified claims — Multiple statements around 2007–2009 projecting ice-free Arctic summers by 2013–2018 (e.g., some linear extrapolations of volume loss). Still not occurred.

Mostafa Tolba (UN Environment Programme executive director, scientific background) — 1982 warning of environmental catastrophe “as complete, as irreversible as any nuclear holocaust” by 2000.

1989 UN environment official — Prediction that entire nations could be wiped off the Earth by rising seas if extreme action was not taken by 2000.

Early high-end sea-level or ice-sheet collapse statements — Some individual scientists in the 2000s suggested rapid multi-meter rises or irreversible West Antarctic collapse on short timelines that have not materialized at the rates claimed.

Extreme scenario reliance — Heavy use of RCP8.5 / SSP5-8.5 (“business as usual”) pathways in research and communication for years; these required implausibly high coal use and emissions trajectories that are now widely regarded as unrealistic.

I left celebrities and other crap ( Al Gore, Prince Charles, John Kerry, Greta Thunberg, Leonardo DiCaprio, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown etc.) out for now...

Donate here and save earth:
https://thegretathunbergfoundation.org/

Many studies and predictions have been made, and you just cherry-picked the ones which were wrong. 😀

Even plain old climate models have been rather accurate, and the recent ones have been significantly improved.

https://www.science.org/content/article/even-50-year-old-climate-models-correctly-predicted-global-warming

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2019GL085378

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, candide said:

Many studies and predictions have been made, and you just cherry-picked the ones which were wrong. 😀

Even plain old climate models have been rather accurate, and the recent ones have been significantly improved.

https://www.science.org/content/article/even-50-year-old-climate-models-correctly-predicted-global-warming

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2019GL085378

Your side does the same thing and so I toss your cherry picked ones to bin too. Your claims and studies don’t change my thinking one bit. I don’t worry about the climate at all. The fearmongering, specially kids, and money-making around it should stop. And all these hypocrites and Hollywood figures should keep their mouths shut until they actually practice what they preach.

So should climate cult people stop terrorizing normal people with their stupid vandalism and protests.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
(edited)
15 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

Your side does the same thing and so I toss your cherry picked ones to bin too. Your claims and studies don’t change my thinking one bit. I don’t worry about the climate at all. The fearmongering, specially kids, and money-making around it should stop. And all these hypocrites and Hollywood figures should keep their mouths shut until they actually practice what they preach.

So should climate cult people stop terrorizing normal people with their stupid vandalism and protests.

Blah blah! As analysed in the linked article published in a peer reviewed journal, climate models have been rather accurate.

Edited by candide

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, candide said:

Blah blah! As analysed in the linked article published in a peer reviewed journal, climate models have been rather accurate.

Blah blah to you too. Accurate in your illusion.

I wrote many times that I do not buy your fearmongering. I enjoy my life instead of fearing of made up catastrophies.

i hope you have given up flying, cars, heating, airconditioning and do your part as a good cult member should.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
42 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

Blah blah to you too. Accurate in your illusion.

I wrote many times that I do not buy your fearmongering. I enjoy my life instead of fearing of made up catastrophies.

i hope you have given up flying, cars, heating, airconditioning and do your part as a good cult member should.

No blah blah from me. Reliable peer-reviewed scientific publications in recognised journals.

Of course, if you cannot distinguish between reliable scientific publications and propaganda noise....

Feel free to link scientific publications such as meta-analyses of previous forecasts. I'm not holding by breath! 😀

kwilco Ruby Member

kwilco

Advanced Member
(edited)
7 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

You mean the car that’s outselling every other EV while people like you still think ‘Swasticar’

You mean the car that’s outselling every other EV while people like you still think ‘Swasticar’ - globally they are now totally outsold by BYD

image.png

Deflection! the tool of those who have no argument with the topic. (and don't appear to know about the global image of Tesla)

Edited by kwilco

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member
32 minutes ago, kwilco said:

You mean the car that’s outselling every other EV while people like you still think ‘Swasticar’ - globally they are now totally outsold by BYD

image.png

Deflection! the tool of those who have no argument with the topic. (and don't appear to know about the global image of Tesla)

Sure you love BYD. That's very suitable car for climate communists.

You have a free choice now.

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, candide said:

No blah blah from me. Reliable peer-reviewed scientific publications in recognised journals.

Of course, if you cannot distinguish between reliable scientific publications and propaganda noise....

Feel free to link scientific publications such as meta-analyses of previous forecasts. I'm not holding by breath! 😀

You do not seem to understand what you read.

Again: I wrote many times that I do not buy your fearmongering. I enjoy my life instead of fearing of made up catastrophies.

You can continue fearmongering with your stats + you can have your last word on the issue and WIN if your ego that needs.

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member

This is the bible for the ASEAN forum fearmongering climate catastrophy cultists. Very good fit to these marxists.

https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-first-global-revolution-1991/

The First Global Revolution

In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.. The real enemy then is humanity itself..

It would seem that men and women need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum. Such a motivation seemed to have ceased to exist or have yet to be found. The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.

Democracy will be made to seem responsible for the lagging economy, the scarcity and uncertainties. The very concept of democracy could then be brought into question and allow for the seizure of power.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

You do not seem to understand what you read.

Again: I wrote many times that I do not buy your fearmongering. I enjoy my life instead of fearing of made up catastrophies.

You can continue fearmongering with your stats + you can have your last word on the issue and WIN if your ego that needs.

You do not seem to understand. I don't care whether you "buy" or not what I write!

RPCVguy Advanced Member

RPCVguy

Advanced Member

Considering the range of some comments, this sober conversation between a climate scientist, a mathematician and a podcaster discussing doomers is relevant. The three do not all agree, making for some interesting moments.
"Are Doomers Really the Bad Guys? with Eliot Jacobson"
https://youtu.be/BI7AzrU0yK8

Dr. Eliot Jacobson is a retired academic, former casino gaming consultant, and prominent climate science commentator. His perspectives of odds on events probably fits with much of the range of views already shared.

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member

Reliable invented data from sources that never existed.

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations.

When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

Tokens.jpg

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member
(edited)

“Climate change wreaking havoc on our planet.”

~ Prince WetWipe Harry


Because nothing saves the planet quite like being a frequent flier on private jets and virtue-signalling his hypocrisy to mask the entitlement.

Burden.jpg

Edited by FinChin67

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.