Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Reform UK Pushes Navy Plan for Channel Crossings

Reform UK has said it would deploy Royal Navy vessels to intercept small boats crossing the English Channel and return migrants to France or Belgium under a proposal it calls “Operation Fortress”.

Announcing the plans at a news conference, the party said the operation would involve what it described as the largest military deployment in the Channel since the Second World War. Reform said its home affairs spokesman, Zia Yusuf, would have the navy “intercept” boats and carry out the returns as part of what he called a humanitarian response.

Yusuf said the scheme would be compatible with obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, arguing that Article 2 protects the right to life. He also said international maritime rules allow states to pick people up from vessels in danger, but not to take them to another country without consent.

When asked on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme how such returns could be carried out if France did not agree, Yusuf acknowledged there could be a “diplomatic argument”. He said he believed the UK and France had a “commitment under international law” to process migrants.

Navy Intercepts and Planned Returns

Reform’s proposal would, according to Yusuf, see Royal Navy ships intercept all migrant boats in the Channel. The plan is framed as a humanitarian mission, with Yusuf saying the approach would involve returning migrants to France or Belgium rather than allowing crossings to continue.

The party also indicated it would use the navy as part of a broader attempt to control Channel arrivals, which it links to the scale of illegal migration across the route.

Warnings Over Practicalities With France

Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh said on Today programme that the policy would involve a prolonged dispute with France. She said government efforts should focus on disrupting criminal gangs and increasing enforcement, adding that ministers “absolutely needs to get a grip” on crossings.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has pledged to be “relentless” in tackling small boat journeys, while stressing that the UK needs an asylum system that offers safe routes.

Burnham visited Dover over the weekend and said the government was “changing the whole approach” to Channel crossings. He said the number of enforcement officers targeting people-smuggling gangs had doubled on both sides of the Channel.

Home Office figures showed that the number of National Crime Agency (NCA) officers working on smuggling operations had risen to almost 800, compared with 376 at the start of 2025.

Channel Crossing Numbers

More than 2,000 migrants have reached the UK on small boats since Burnham became prime minister a fortnight ago. On Saturday, 326 people crossed the English Channel.

Home Office data said crossings this year are down around 43% compared with the same period in 2025. The figures also show the number of small boats crossing the Channel has been trending down since it peaked in 2022, although it remains a major issue for UK border and asylum policy.

Criticism From Defence and Opposition Figures

Reform’s plan drew criticism from retired armed forces personnel and from the Conservative opposition. Retired Royal Navy commander Tom Sharpe told the BBC that the UK’s border force is better placed to manage migrant arrivals than the navy. He said warships are designed for roles such as anti-submarine defence and are “not best used for ferrying people around”, adding that “you’re better off using an actual ferry”.

Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said tackling illegal migration should begin with leaving the European Convention on Human Rights. Speaking on BBC Breakfast, he said this would allow the UK to deport people “within a week of arrival”, either back to their country of origin if possible or to a safe third country such as Rwanda if not. Philp said he believed the approach would create a “deterrent effect” by reducing the incentive to cross the Channel.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

3 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, webfact said:

Warnings Over Practicalities With France

Of course.

"Reform" consists of the dumbest people at all.

Proposing something what they know it will not happen, because it's against all existing laws.

I'm afraid stupidity could gain the majority once.

My hope Burnham will tell people the truth what is possible and what is stupid right wing populism only.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member

Maybe Nigel will also have the British Royal Navy do a bit more than just shadow Russian warships doing live-fire exercises sur La Manche?

The clown party...for clowns.

(with apologies to actual clowns everywhere)

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, johng said:

All you'll get from Burn-em is 'hope' for more of the exact same crap as all the lying puppets that have come before him..even if he wanted to stop the migrants he can't as he is just the puppet.

When dumbness meets reality there will be always clashes.

As long our society is built up on laws and the majority decided to follow the laws the authorities and the PM will know what to do.

I for myself don't want to be ruled by puppets. Who got the strings then? Putin?

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
26 minutes ago, johng said:

maybe this lot.

https://www.thenational.scot/news/26405380.many-burnhams-cabinet-back-labour-friends-israel-backers/

As long government members/cabinet follow and respect Burnham's goals and efforts they can support anything, a kindergarten or any other lobby group

biggles45 Silver Member

biggles45

Advanced Member

Wouldn't this be illegal under international refugee laws and subject to legal appeal by all those who want the UK to have more immigrants. If not, then it could have been done years ago?

VillageIdiot Silver Member

VillageIdiot

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, DeaconJohn said:

It might just work if done properly.

Nothing else seems to have had any effect.

The Frogs are totally incompetent in this matter - either that, or they want to see the UK swamped with illegals for some reason.

Your last line nails it.

"Napoleon's Revenge."

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, DeaconJohn said:

or they want to see the UK swamped with illegals for some reason.

Maybe they just do not want them on French soil!

rocketboy2 Gold Member

rocketboy2

Advanced Member
Just now, josephbloggs said:


Sorry, the only button he pushed is the "laugh hysterically at his nonsense" button and the "laugh hysterically at the gammons thinking it's a well thought out plan". Well done Nige!

Oops.

Must have unblocked you by accident.

Fixed it.

Bye. giggle

DeaconJohn Advanced Member

DeaconJohn

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Maybe they just do not want them on French soil!

Who really wants them?

They're being used as pawns in a geopolitical gambit to radically change the traditional cultures of certain targeted countries.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Of course.

"Reform" consists of the dumbest people at all.

Proposing something what they know it will not happen, because it's against all existing laws.

I'm afraid stupidity could gain the majority once.

My hope Burnham will tell people the truth what is possible and what is stupid right wing populism only.

Worked ok for Australia. The boats stopped.

MIke B Bad Gold Member

MIke B Bad

Advanced Member

Apparently the naval ship used in this Reform UK main poster is from the Brazilian Navy.........

image.png

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
(edited)
1 hour ago, bannork said:

You can't compare the two.

Australia turns back boats in a vast ocean, much safer and easier to tow their sturdier boats than the flimsy migrant dinghies of the English Channel back to a transit nation.

The English Channel is the busiest shipping lane in the world. There is hardly any international water between French and UK territorial waters for naval ships to manoeuvre in.

Blocking or intercepting the dinghies by naval ships could easily lead to capsizing, contravening the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This was mentioned by a retired admiral yesterday.

Then pick them up and fly them to the Shetlands or Orkneys to a military style camp and process them there. Deport the unsuccessful claimants. Undocumented arrivals remain in the camps until they identify themselves.

There is no requirement under any law that I'm aware of for them to be put up in hotels at taxpayer expense.

Edited by emptypockets

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, NanLaew said:

Ah yes, the forum block. The last redoubt of the dull and the gormless.

Crack on.

I love the fact they always think they have to announce it like anyone cares.

rocketboy2 Gold Member

rocketboy2

Advanced Member
10 hours ago, NanLaew said:

Ah yes, the forum block. The last redoubt of the dull and the gormless.

Crack on.

Pop your Forum hat back on please.

Thank you.

Have a nice day.

a83.PNG

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.