Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Rejoining Customs Union Won't Undo Brexit Damage

Brexit has reduced UK exports to the European Union by an estimated 12%, with most of the decline linked to the country's departure from the EU single market rather than its exit from the customs union, according to new research.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The analysis, conducted by economists John Springford and Anton Spisak of the Centre for European Reform (CER), comes as debate over the UK's future relationship with the EU gains renewed political attention nearly a decade after the 2016 referendum.

Exports to EU Remain Below Pre-Brexit Expectations

Their findings indicate that UK services exports to the EU are around 7% lower than they would have been had Britain remained a member of the bloc, while goods exports are 16% lower.

Using trade data and economic modelling, the researchers conclude that around 10 percentage points of the overall 12% decline in exports can be attributed to leaving the single market.

They argue that regulatory barriers introduced after Brexit, including certification requirements and checks to ensure compliance with EU standards, have had a greater effect on trade than customs-related obstacles.

Single Market Departure Seen as Main Factor

According to the study, sectors experiencing the largest losses include travel, finance and insurance, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and agrifood.

The researchers also suggest that previous estimates may have understated the impact on services exports. Their assessment takes into account a rise in services trade among EU member states following the Covid-19 pandemic, growth from which the UK has largely been excluded.

Political Debate Over Future EU Ties

The findings emerge as Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves continue to emphasise the importance of improving trade relations with the EU. A UK-EU summit is scheduled for next month.

However, the government has maintained its position that it will not seek to rejoin either the single market or the customs union, nor restore freedom of movement.

At the same time, potential future Labour leadership contenders Andy Burnham and Wes Streeting have both indicated support for eventual UK re-entry into the EU.

The Liberal Democrats have also shifted their stance. Party leader Ed Davey recently announced that the party would campaign for the UK to rejoin the single market, moving beyond its previous support for customs union membership alone.

Customs Union Benefits Viewed as Limited

The CER study argues that rejoining the customs union would provide only modest economic gains. While it would remove the need for businesses to comply with complex "rules of origin" requirements governing tariff-free trade, it would do little to address the challenges facing the services sector.

The researchers found that relatively few current exports are affected by those rules, suggesting the overall boost to trade would be limited.

They also note that customs union membership would restrict the UK's ability to negotiate independent trade agreements, since members must apply the EU's external tariff regime.

By contrast, regaining access to the single market could recover a much larger share of lost trade. However, the economists say such a move would involve significant political compromises, including accepting freedom of movement, contributing to the EU budget and aligning with EU regulations without direct influence over their creation.

The report also finds little evidence that stronger trade relationships with non-EU countries have compensated for reduced trade with Europe, contrary to arguments made by some Brexit supporters before the referendum.

Its conclusions are broadly in line with other studies estimating that Brexit has reduced UK economic output by between 4% and 8%.

screenshot_3906.jpg

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Bangkok Barry Star Member

Bangkok Barry

Advanced Member

It has been made increasingly clear that Brexit was a con, with no-one - least of all those who 'sold the dream' - understanding the ramifications of leaving the world's biggest trading bloc. 'Now we'll be free to trade with the rest of the world' (we already could), 'now we'll be free of being governed by EU laws' (ask anyone what they were and get a blank stare). And so on. The pound never recovered - from memory it crashed from about 1.46 to the dollar to around 1.24 and has only clawed part of that back since.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, Bangkok Barry said:

It has been made increasingly clear that Brexit was a con, with no-one - least of all those who 'sold the dream' - understanding the ramifications of leaving the world's biggest trading bloc. 'Now we'll be free to trade with the rest of the world' (we already could), 'now we'll be free of being governed by EU laws' (ask anyone what they were and get a blank stare). And so on. The pound never recovered - from memory it crashed from about 1.46 to the dollar to around 1.24 and has only clawed part of that back since.

True, but at least we have bendy bananas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uovt1sC3rtM

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

Doesn't matter what Starmer thinks.

Lame duck PM. Burnham won Makerfield.

So long 2 tier Keir. Its been anything but a pleasure.

loong Ruby Member

loong

Advanced Member

Exports to the EU have reduced by 12%.
Imports from the EU have reduced by 16%.

Isn't that a net gain?

mfd101 Platinum Member

mfd101

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, loong said:

Exports to the EU have reduced by 12%.
Imports from the EU have reduced by 16%.

Isn't that a net gain?

Depends on the size of the exports relative to the size of the imports.

Leopold Bloom Senior Member

Leopold Bloom

Member

The Brexit vote was the one and only example of the voice of the people being directly heard - the truest form of democracy imaginable (there is nothing democratic about the first-past-the-post system.)

17 million people, overwhelmingly working class, having seen the chaos produced in Germany by the vandalising of its border by Mutti Merkel, said we don't want to be a part of a "community" that trashes so openly and willingly 500 or more years of its culture almost over night.

Even though they "spoke" their truth and expressed their wishes for the future of their country, the ruling classes (both Tory and Labour) did everything possible to negate the intent of the People.

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, Leopold Bloom said:

The Brexit vote was the one and only example of the voice of the people being directly heard - the truest form of democracy imaginable (there is nothing democratic about the first-past-the-post system.)

17 million people, overwhelmingly working class, having seen the chaos produced in Germany by the vandalising of its border by Mutti Merkel, said we don't want to be a part of a "community" that trashes so openly and willingly 500 or more years of its culture almost over night.

Even though they "spoke" their truth and expressed their wishes for the future of their country, the ruling classes (both Tory and Labour) did everything possible to negate the intent of the People.

And continue to do so.

It is a bit of "a blast from the past" but no doubt we can expect the debates (at least in Parliament) on rejoining the Customs Union or the Single Market to be at least carefully managed if not suppressed.

rickudon Gold Member

rickudon

Advanced Member

It was a case of claims were made for Brexit which could not be backed up by evidence. That it would be a disaster for the economy was obvious. As for immigration, we swapped Polish and other eastern European workers (who mainly did work Brits didn't want to do, and at least had a somewhat similar culture) for people with crap degrees from South Asia who had little interest in integration and didn't want to do the mainly manual jobs. And now the brexiteers want to blame Labour for what they themselves caused to happen!

Unfortunately, voting doesn't require an intelligence test.

bkk_mike Platinum Member

bkk_mike

Advanced Member

The only argument now about Brexit is whether it's costing the country £2 billion a week (the estimate from Bloomberg), or £4 billion a week (the estimate from the National Bureau of Economic Research in the US).

Both those figures are coming from the US, not from one side or the other in the UK.

The real issue - before the vote - it was all "we can be like Norway or Switzerland - rich countries outside the EU", so why is it that after the vote, we apparently are not allowed to choose a Norway or Switzerland style deal with the EU (because that's NOT what people voted for???), and instead have to pick the Albania option?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member

From an economic POV, the problem is that there never was a clear and shared project among people who voted Brexit, apart from leaving and blaming foreigners. For example, the ultraliberal economic program of the economists for Brexit (low-tax, globalised economy, i.e. Singapore on Thames), could have worked (at a social cost). However, it could not have been shared and supported by the working class people who voted Brexit because they felt they had been left behind (in particular by the City guys).

Because of this lack of a clear and shared project, there is no Brexit benchmark standard, so:

  • There are no clear guidelines and assessment criteria for public policy

  • Anyone can claim that the real Brexit did not actually happen, as it was never clearly defined.

NB. I don't particularly support an ultraliberal economic stance, because of its social impact. I am just highlighting that it was the only clear and coherent Brexit project.

Red Forever Gold Member

Red Forever

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Doesn't matter what Starmer thinks.

Lame duck PM. Burnham won Makerfield.

So long 2 tier Keir. Its been anything but a pleasure.

Another “Jonny wanders spectacularly off subject to spew his childish hatred” posts.

You spectacularly avoided any mention of the Single Market or Customs Union which is what the OP was about. FWIW, I think UK should rejoin both on our path towards undoing the damage caused to UK by the lying, far right grifters.

Talking of far right: I wonder how the Makerfield bye election went for them.

Oops………ha ha ha……!

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Another “Jonny wanders spectacularly off subject to spew his childish hatred” posts.

You spectacularly avoided any mention of the Single Market or Customs Union which is what the OP was about. FWIW, I think UK should rejoin both on our path towards undoing the damage caused to UK by the lying, far right grifters.

Talking of far right: I wonder how the Makerfield bye election went for them.

Oops………ha ha ha……!

Great news from Makerfiield.

Restore up to 7% in only 5 months. In a seat held by labour for 120 years no less. Incredible.

Plus your hero the fascist racist tyrant Starmer will be gone by September.

Marvellous.

Harry Vibhavadi Apprentice Member

Harry Vibhavadi

Member
3 hours ago, bkk_mike said:

The only argument now about Brexit is whether it's costing the country £2 billion a week (the estimate from Bloomberg), or £4 billion a week (the estimate from the National Bureau of Economic Research in the US).

Both those figures are coming from the US, not from one side or the other in the UK.

The real issue - before the vote - it was all "we can be like Norway or Switzerland - rich countries outside the EU", so why is it that after the vote, we apparently are not allowed to choose a Norway or Switzerland style deal with the EU (because that's NOT what people voted for???), and instead have to pick the Albania option?

Who said the EU will ACCEPT a UK in a position like.. Norway / Switzerland / Albania ?

And.. according the "leave" leaders, like Superb Liar Johnson, and.. nonsense-speaker Nigel Farage ( bye the way again highly accepted in the UK) , there would be a SAVING of PST 135 million a week...

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Harry Vibhavadi said:

Who said the EU will ACCEPT a UK in a position like.. Norway / Switzerland / Albania ?

And.. according the "leave" leaders, like Superb Liar Johnson, and.. nonsense-speaker Nigel Farage ( bye the way again highly accepted in the UK) , there would be a SAVING of PST 135 million a week...

Any deal (at a price) was possible during the Brexit negotiations; the EU said as much. The problem - which left Barnier and his negotiating team frustrated - was that the UK team had no clear idea what it wanted for the reasons outlined by @candide

3STTW Advanced Member

3STTW

Member
6 hours ago, candide said:

From an economic POV, the problem is that there never was a clear and shared project among people who voted Brexit, apart from leaving and blaming foreigners. For example, the ultraliberal economic program of the economists for Brexit (low-tax, globalised economy, i.e. Singapore on Thames), could have worked (at a social cost). However, it could not have been shared and supported by the working class people who voted Brexit because they felt they had been left behind (in particular by the City guys).

Because of this lack of a clear and shared project, there is no Brexit benchmark standard, so:

  • There are no clear guidelines and assessment criteria for public policy

  • Anyone can claim that the real Brexit did not actually happen, as it was never clearly defined.

NB. I don't particularly support an ultraliberal economic stance, because of its social impact. I am just highlighting that it was the only clear and coherent Brexit project.


Generally I agree with this, except it wasn't the responsibility of the "people who voted for Brexit" to create policy - it was left to a bunch of pro-EU politicians and civil servants who decided to make the whole process so effing miserable that everyone would want to rejoin after a few years.

Had the UK immediately embarked on a Singapore-on-Thames (lite) approach, it was estimated that the UK would have overtaken Germany into 3rd place in GDP rankings by 2032. This is why the Brits hate their politicians so vehemently - they have no ideas, they relax into the economic models from the past, and they consistently fail to deliver on the policies which the electorate voted for.

The Brexit referendum was not a con, or a stitch-up, or a Russian plot. It was a vote against the EU's glacial decision making, stultifying bureaucracy and, above all, the wholesale sell-out of sovereignty delivered by John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown in the Treaties of Maastricht and Lisbon. Most Brexit voters were 'Brexiteers' long before Cameron introduced the referendum.

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, 3STTW said:


Generally I agree with this, except it wasn't the responsibility of the "people who voted for Brexit" to create policy - it was left to a bunch of pro-EU politicians and civil servants who decided to make the whole process so effing miserable that everyone would want to rejoin after a few years.

Had the UK immediately embarked on a Singapore-on-Thames (lite) approach, it was estimated that the UK would have overtaken Germany into 3rd place in GDP rankings by 2032. This is why the Brits hate their politicians so vehemently - they have no ideas, they relax into the economic models from the past, and they consistently fail to deliver on the policies which the electorate voted for.

The Brexit referendum was not a con, or a stitch-up, or a Russian plot. It was a vote against the EU's glacial decision making, stultifying bureaucracy and, above all, the wholesale sell-out of sovereignty delivered by John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown in the Treaties of Maastricht and Lisbon. Most Brexit voters were 'Brexiteers' long before Cameron introduced the referendum.

At the risk of over-simplifying your post, I agree that Brexit was a vote against the EU. And therein lies the problem, Brexit was not a 'positive' vote in favour of anything other than, perhaps, a naive belief that the UK would regain full sovereignty over its policies and affairs once it left the EU (something that is only possible imo if you live in a closed, planned economy).

To lay the blame for Brexit's failure at the feet of "pro-EU politicians and civil servants" is disingenuous. Notwithstanding the fact that the shape - let alone the detail - of any Brexit deal was unknown in June 2016, I am still unclear what policies could have been/be enacted to ensure Brexit's success.

You suggest that "a Singapore-on-Thames (lite) approach" would have reaped rewards but wrt financial services this is effectively what has happened since Brexit. In itself this was not the result of proactive policy making but a reaction to the loss of 'passporting rights', etc which has meant that the EU and UK have moved further away from each other in terms of regulation: The fact that the City of London has, to date, managed to survive Brexit might, I suppose, be seen as some sort of success.

Red Forever Gold Member

Red Forever

Advanced Member
16 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Great news from Makerfiield.

Restore up to 7% in only 5 months. In a seat held by labour for 120 years no less. Incredible.

Plus your hero the fascist racist tyrant Starmer will be gone by September.

Marvellous.

Do you ever read your posts Jonny?

As a pesky lefty, pinko, tree hugging wokeist I wouldn’t even call Farridge, Lowe and disgraced former PMs Johnson and Truss “fascist racist tyrants “.

Lying, far right grifters yes but not the hyperbolic names that you use, and in doing so, abuse and devalue the effect of.

3STTW Advanced Member

3STTW

Member
On 6/19/2026 at 4:21 PM, JonnyF said:

Great news from Makerfiield.

Restore up to 7% in only 5 months. In a seat held by labour for 120 years no less. Incredible.

Plus your hero the fascist racist tyrant Starmer will be gone by September.

Marvellous.


I don't hate Starmer, he may be feckless, inept, a dreadful communicator, a useless manager, and the worst ever pick for Prime Minister in the history of the position...

But how on god's earth did you get to "fascist racist tyrant"?

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, 3STTW said:


I don't hate Starmer, he may be feckless, inept, a dreadful communicator, a useless manager, and the worst ever pick for Prime Minister in the history of the position...

But how on god's earth did you get to "fascist racist tyrant"?


Ah, you've officially met Jonny. Welcome. He is the master of ridiculous hyperbole. Best thing is just to pity what goes on in his head to get to those conclusions and just enjoy the circus.

temuFarang Senior Member

temuFarang

Member
7 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Ah, you've officially met Jonny. Welcome. He is the master of ridiculous hyperbole. Best thing is just to pity what goes on in his head to get to those conclusions and just enjoy the circus.

The left often labels others as fascists or racists, yet they become upset when similar accusations are directed at them.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
54 minutes ago, temuFarang said:

The left often labels others as fascists or racists, yet they become upset when similar accusations are directed at them.


Ok, thanks.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, 3STTW said:


I don't hate Starmer, he may be feckless, inept, a dreadful communicator, a useless manager, and the worst ever pick for Prime Minister in the history of the position...

But how on god's earth did you get to "fascist racist tyrant"?

Locking up the white wives of political opponents for 31 months for a tweet would be a good place to start.

That probably covers all 3 words in one example but I have many more specific examples for each word.

This piece of human filth is not called 2 tier keir for nothing.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, Red Forever said:

Do you ever read your posts Jonny?

As a pesky lefty, pinko, tree hugging wokeist I wouldn’t even call Farridge, Lowe and disgraced former PMs Johnson and Truss “fascist racist tyrants “.

Lying, far right grifters yes but not the hyperbolic names that you use, and in doing so, abuse and devalue the effect of.

He is a fascist racist tyrant.

You support him.

Let that sink in, commie.

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
50 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

He is a fascist racist tyrant.

You support him.

Let that sink in, commie.

<backs slowly out of room whilst intoning anything you say...sir... > and then effing legs it !

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Locking up the white wives of political opponents for 31 months for a tweet would be a good place to start.

That probably covers all 3 words in one example but I have many more specific examples for each word.

This piece of human filth is not called 2 tier keir for nothing.


He didn't lock her up.

She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred.

You'll never ever let that get through your skull though. Too inconvenient a fact.

temuFarang Senior Member

temuFarang

Member
7 hours ago, josephbloggs said:


Ok, thanks.

You are very welcome.

bkk_mike Platinum Member

bkk_mike

Advanced Member
On 6/19/2026 at 2:11 PM, candide said:

From an economic POV, the problem is that there never was a clear and shared project among people who voted Brexit, apart from leaving and blaming foreigners. For example, the ultraliberal economic program of the economists for Brexit (low-tax, globalised economy, i.e. Singapore on Thames), could have worked (at a social cost). However, it could not have been shared and supported by the working class people who voted Brexit because they felt they had been left behind (in particular by the City guys).

Because of this lack of a clear and shared project, there is no Brexit benchmark standard, so:

  • There are no clear guidelines and assessment criteria for public policy

  • Anyone can claim that the real Brexit did not actually happen, as it was never clearly defined.

NB. I don't particularly support an ultraliberal economic stance, because of its social impact. I am just highlighting that it was the only clear and coherent Brexit project.

Every time some economist tries to talk about London being Singapore on Thames, nobody mentions how 85% of people in Singapore are living in what is essentially council houses (HDB housing).

They subsidise housing, subsidise public transport, and they also subsidise utilities for people in that same HDB housing. Think of it like the government pays the first £100 of your electricity bill - so if your bill in the UK would be £105, your bill in Singapore would be £5.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
On 6/19/2026 at 12:13 PM, Leopold Bloom said:

The Brexit vote was the one and only example of the voice of the people being directly heard - the truest form of democracy imaginable (there is nothing democratic about the first-past-the-post system.)

17 million people, overwhelmingly working class, having seen the chaos produced in Germany by the vandalising of its border by Mutti Merkel, said we don't want to be a part of a "community" that trashes so openly and willingly 500 or more years of its culture almost over night.

Even though they "spoke" their truth and expressed their wishes for the future of their country, the ruling classes (both Tory and Labour) did everything possible to negate the intent of the People.

Brilliantly said.

Shame on the anti Democrats who wanted to reverse the result of the Brexit vote and simultaneously insult the electorate.

It's no surprise that fans of a technocratic corrupt EU would fight democracy but shame on them none the less.

Shame on them @RayC

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Brilliantly said.

Shame on the anti Democrats who wanted to reverse the result of the Brexit vote and simultaneously insult the electorate.

It's no surprise that fans of a technocratic corrupt EU would fight democracy but shame on them none the less.

Shame on them @RayC

I would largely agree with @Leopold Bloom first two paragraphs, less so the third: The rest of your post contains nothing more than your usual tiresome, empty anti-EU rhetoric.

By naming me in your post, you infer that I wanted to reverse i.e. not implement the Brexit referendum result. I have previously challenged you to produce a post where I called for a second ('Peoples') vote in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum, and you were unable to do so for the simple reason that no such post exists. You are now reduced to snide insinuation and indirect inference.

Sad and pathetic but not surprising and par for the course.

bkk_mike Platinum Member

bkk_mike

Advanced Member
On 6/19/2026 at 1:25 PM, JAG said:

And continue to do so.

It is a bit of "a blast from the past" but no doubt we can expect the debates (at least in Parliament) on rejoining the Customs Union or the Single Market to be at least carefully managed if not suppressed.

Because absolutely NOBODY on the Leave side kept saying "we can be like Norway"?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.