Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Switzerland Votes on 10 Million Population Cap

Swiss voters will head to the polls on Sunday to decide whether the country should impose a population cap of 10 million people, in a closely contested referendum that has exposed deep divisions over immigration, housing and Switzerland’s future relationship with Europe.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The proposal, backed by the right-wing Swiss People's Party, is presented as a “sustainability initiative” designed to reduce pressure on housing, public services and the environment.

Population Growth at Centre of Referendum

Opponents, including the Swiss government, major political parties, business groups and trade unions, argue the measure would create economic disruption, worsen labour shortages and damage ties with the European Union.

Immigration Debate Divides Voters

Switzerland’s population has risen from 7.3 million in 2002 to 9.1 million today, with foreign residents accounting for around 27% of the population.

Supporters of the initiative say rapid population growth has contributed to housing shortages, crowded transport networks, rising healthcare costs and pressure on schools and social services.

Among them is local politician Nils Fiechter, who argues that immigration has become excessive and that Switzerland has lost control over population growth.

Critics reject that view. Helin Genis, a Social Democrat councillor in Bern, says migrants are being blamed for problems caused by broader policy decisions on housing, infrastructure and public investment.

Recent opinion polls suggest the result could be extremely close. Surveys indicate a narrow lead for the “No” campaign, with around 52% opposed and 45% in favour, while a significant share of voters remain undecided.

How the Population Cap Would Work

The proposal would require Switzerland’s population to remain below 10 million until 2050. The government would be instructed to take action once the population reaches 9.5 million.

Potential measures could include reducing asylum admissions and ending family reunification rights for foreign workers.

The initiative also states that if the population reaches 10 million, Switzerland would have to withdraw from international agreements that prevent enforcement of the cap. This could include ending participation in the EU’s free movement of people framework.

Economic and Diplomatic Concerns

Business groups warn that restricting immigration could create serious labour shortages.

Foreign workers play a major role in sectors including hospitality, healthcare and elder care. Employers argue that access to skilled workers from across Europe is vital for the Swiss economy, particularly as the country’s population ages.

Rudolf Minsch of Economiesuisse has warned that approving the initiative could complicate relations with the European Union, Switzerland’s largest trading partner.

Opponents also argue that Switzerland needs younger workers and taxpayers to help support a growing elderly population, with around one-fifth of residents now aged over 65.

Fears of Isolation

The referendum comes amid broader concerns about Switzerland’s international position. Despite its longstanding neutrality, the country has been moving towards closer defence cooperation with neighbouring states while facing economic pressures linked to global conflicts and trade disputes.

Social Democrat parliamentarian Jon Pult has warned that the initiative risks leaving Switzerland isolated at a time of growing international uncertainty.

Supporters dismiss such concerns, arguing that both Switzerland and the EU have strong incentives to maintain their existing economic relationship regardless of the vote’s outcome.

As campaigning enters its final hours, voters appear split between concerns over population growth and fears that tighter limits could weaken Switzerland’s economic and diplomatic standing.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 June 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

FlorC Platinum Member

FlorC

Advanced Member

Lucky Swiss get to vote on that.

Hopefully it is all above board.

Jim Waldron Silver Member

Jim Waldron

Advanced Member

The Swiss are not alone.

A population cap sounds attractive in theory, and it will certainly appeal to parts of the Right. But in my opinion, putting this to a referendum overlooks a much bigger issue facing many countries today.

Housing shortages, overloaded infrastructure and poor urban planning are largely home-grown problems.

In Switzerland’s case, it is easier to blame migrants than explain why one of Europe’s richest countries has failed to build enough housing and infrastructure for decades.

A referendum will not fix long-term policy failures. It risks turning them into a culture-war vote instead.

Switzerland may end up voting on the symptoms while ignoring the real diagnosis.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member

Switzerland is a country where they have commercialised and industrialised suicide. Switzerland is also a country that handed over refugees to the Nazis, straight to Death Camps, citing population concerns, while profiting from WW2.

The Swiss solution to ultimate population control. Get rid of the old and weak.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

But...do the Swiss screw???

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

But...do the Swiss screw???

Aren't you in favour of euthanasia?

FlorC Platinum Member

FlorC

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

Switzerland is a country where they have commercialised and industrialised suicide. Switzerland is also a country that handed over refugees to the Nazis, straight to Death Camps, citing population concerns, while profiting from WW2.

The Swiss solution to ultimate population control. Get rid of the old and weak.

Sadly not doing it with the present invaders.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, FlorC said:

Sadly not doing it with the present invaders.

Literally you just posted in support of cannibalism. That's the meaning of the movie; kill people to turn them into food.

Or else you meant send immigrants to death camps to be gassed etc (what Switzerland did from 1940 to 44).

Your Grandparents/parents would despair. They fought in World Wars for you in 2026 to post about the industrialised murder of immigrants. But maybe they were on the side doing all the mass murder.

swissie Platinum Member

swissie

Advanced Member

I would like to give my 2 cents worth.

27% of the populating are not Swiss. World record. Never has such an invasion taken place in recent history where never a single shot has been fired. In larger cities, non Swiss consist of over 50% of the population.

Looking at this I wonder on a daily basis: In what country do I live exactly?

The doors have been open for everybody. Not to forget, the "welfare system" is generous. This news has even spread into the remotest corners of Africa.

Not to worry. Once more this will be turned down by the voters. As usual when it comes to this matter, the ghost of "no future economic growth/possible economic suizide" has once more been introduced into the political discussion. As usual.

Historically highly interesting. Never before has a country been "taken over" by invadors, not having needed to fire a single shot to achieve this goal.

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, swissie said:

27% of the populating are not Swiss. World record. Never has such an invasion taken place in recent history where never a single shot has been fired. In larger cities, non Swiss consist of over 50% of the population.

Looking at the fact that until the high Middle Ages -- not really that long ago -- nobody existed who actually would have called himself Swiss: what a historically blind argument you are making, comparing the status quo to something that 'never happened in recent history'.

In fact, the Staufer dynasty founded or chartered many of the early Swiss towns to increase the wealth of their Swabian heartlands; those same Swiss cities confederated in oppostion to the later replacement of the Staufer emperors, the Habsburg dynasty.

That, frankly, makes the Swiss -- historically -- nothing more than rebellious southern Germans.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, swissie said:

I would like to give my 2 cents worth.

27% of the populating are not Swiss. World record. Never has such an invasion taken place in recent history where never a single shot has been fired. In larger cities, non Swiss consist of over 50% of the population.

Looking at this I wonder on a daily basis: In what country do I live exactly?

The doors have been open for everybody. Not to forget, the "welfare system" is generous. This news has even spread into the remotest corners of Africa.

Not to worry. Once more this will be turned down by the voters. As usual when it comes to this matter, the ghost of "no future economic growth/possible economic suizide" has once more been introduced into the political discussion. As usual.

Historically highly interesting. Never before has a country been "taken over" by invadors, not having needed to fire a single shot to achieve this goal.

So not an Arsenal or Sunderland supporter then? Xhaka, always a Gunner, left as a legend. Amazing redemption story, and what happens with a change in manager.

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, jts-khorat said:

That, frankly, makes the Swiss -- historically -- nothing more than rebellious southern Germans

Oh dear - cuckoo clocks at dawn?

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, swissie said:

Not to worry. Once more this will be turned down by the voters. As usual when it comes to this matter, the ghost of "no future economic growth/possible economic suizide" has once more been introduced into the political discussion. As usual.

At least they are being allowed to vote on it!

FlorC Platinum Member

FlorC

Advanced Member

I wonder how many of those 27 % "not original Swiss"

are allowed to vote.

If they do , we already know the outcome .

mfd101 Platinum Member

mfd101

Advanced Member

All of us are living (whether we understand it or not, symbolically 500 years after Columbus sailed the ocean blue) the thousand-year history of the reunification of the human species. It's happening whether we like it or not. And what a great ride it is!

'Westerners' living in Thailand might like to reflect on their own rôle in the process.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member

Considering that, as in other developped countries, the population is getting older (the baby boom generation retiring), it may lead to labor shortages.

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, JAG said:

Oh dear - cuckoo clocks at dawn?

Funny enough, cuckoo clocks are a cultural good over the whole Swabian/Alemannian cultural region, which includes the Black Forest and large parts of Switzerland.

Which proves my point, that the Swiss are just wayward southern Germans without a true separate cultural identity.

(I am halfway joking, as I actually work for a Swiss company).

swissie Platinum Member

swissie

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, jts-khorat said:

Funny enough, cuckoo clocks are a cultural good over the whole Swabian/Alemannian cultural region, which includes the Black Forest and large parts of Switzerland.

Which proves my point, that the Swiss are just wayward southern Germans without a true separate cultural identity.

(I am halfway joking, as I actually work for a Swiss company).

We can expand on this: As we speak the same language, Germans Autrichians and Swiss are all the same "tribe". We are native Europeans, we didn't immigrate from Tiumbukto to Europe.

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
On 6/13/2026 at 10:18 AM, Roadsternut said:

Switzerland is a country where they have commercialised and industrialised suicide. Switzerland is also a country that handed over refugees to the Nazis, straight to Death Camps, citing population concerns, while profiting from WW2.

The Swiss solution to ultimate population control. Get rid of the old and weak.

I think you are jealous the best present I bought my for my wife (apart from a condo in Jomtien) was a Swiss Rolex in the duty free at Heathrow Airport - and I said if we can't send the papers and boxes back home I'm not risking taking it through Thai custom - as luck would have it the girl selling them was Thai and another Thai staff was summons up to send the collateral back to a friend and my wife got her present. It's worth probably 30% more now as it had gold in it as well. Smart people the Swiss the hills are alive with the sound of music. Also you are wrong in context with both points but don't let that stop you making a grand statement.

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
23 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

Literally you just posted in support of cannibalism. That's the meaning of the movie; kill people to turn them into food.

Or else you meant send immigrants to death camps to be gassed etc (what Switzerland did from 1940 to 44).

Your Grandparents/parents would despair. They fought in World Wars for you in 2026 to post about the industrialised murder of immigrants. But maybe they were on the side doing all the mass murder.

As a child I use to eat my scabs - they were well tasty. I imagine a deep fried milk fed baby would beat a suckling pig for taste.

Home Secretary, Sir Samuel Hoare.

In 1938, as refugees fled Nazi Germany and Austria, the Home Office was worried about large-scale immigration. Hoare told Parliament:

"We cannot make this country a country of permanent asylum."

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

As a child I use to eat my scabs - they were well tasty. I imagine a deep fried milk fed baby would beat a suckling pig for taste.

Home Secretary, Sir Samuel Hoare.

In 1938, as refugees fled Nazi Germany and Austria, the Home Office was worried about large-scale immigration. Hoare told Parliament:

Screenshot 2026-06-14 153603.jpg

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
19 hours ago, swissie said:

27% of the populating are not Swiss. World record. Never has such an invasion taken place in recent history where never a single shot has been fired.

You may not have noticed this is happening in western countries globably.

swissie Platinum Member

swissie

Advanced Member
On 6/13/2026 at 11:18 AM, Roadsternut said:

Switzerland is a country where they have commercialised and industrialised suicide. Switzerland is also a country that handed over refugees to the Nazis, straight to Death Camps, citing population concerns, while profiting from WW2.

The Swiss solution to ultimate population control. Get rid of the old and weak.

swissie Platinum Member

swissie

Advanced Member
On 6/13/2026 at 11:18 AM, Roadsternut said:

Switzerland is a country where they have commercialised and industrialised suicide. Switzerland is also a country that handed over refugees to the Nazis, straight to Death Camps, citing population concerns, while profiting from WW2.

The Swiss solution to ultimate population control. Get rid of the old and weak.

Same in the US. Masses of European Jews wanted to flee to the US. But the US closed the doors. Should Switzerland have accomodated 6 million Jews? Consisting of 4 million Swiss at the time?

Otherwise your anti Swiss comments are becoming legendary. It proves that if searching long enough in the internet, one can come easily to the conclusion that the devil was born in Switzerland.

"ROADSTER NUT". Should that tell me something?

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, swissie said:

We can expand on this: As we speak the same language, Germans Autrichians and Swiss are all the same "tribe". We are native Europeans, we didn't immigrate from Tiumbukto to Europe.

That is true, the Alemans immigrated from Southern Scandinavia, so are not "native" to Switzerland at all (in a historic sense).

But moving away from this as an argument, even a playful one in this serious debate (it is as weak as yours): I always wonder when people who have successfully emigrated to a far-away foreign country talk about immigration as if those people were invaders, while in the next breath complaining about Thai visa difficulties, wholly without seeing the irony. Are they too self-consumed, too blind, or just hypocrites, or worse?

I have been to places (in Africa as it were) where I was obviously not welcome, and it sharpened my sense on how that must feel when you are in a minority -- in my case of me alone -- and the shoe is on the other foot.

Also, I have a daughter with my Thai wife, and we currently live in Germany. I am hyper-aware that my daughter could easily be this kind of "unwelcome" foreigner if such politics would gain the upper hand, and maybe her own children and even grandchildren (as she carries the obvious skin, hair and eye phenotypes to make her stand out as different).

So, for somebody who made Thailand his home for a time, or has a Thai partner, such tinking is hypocrisy of the highest kind; if somebody has gone as far as having half-Thai children, this would unmask him as evil in the true sense.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, swissie said:

Same in the US. Masses of European Jews wanted to flee to the US. But the US closed the doors. Should Switzerland have accomodated 6 million Jews? Consisting of 4 million Swiss at the time?

Otherwise your anti Swiss comments are becoming legendary. It proves that if searching long enough in the internet, one can come easily to the conclusion that the devil was born in Switzerland.

"ROADSTER NUT". Should that tell me something?

Did the US actually hand over Jews to be sent to the death camps? Nope. Switzerland stopped in 1944, when it was clear Germany was losing, and there would be a reckoning.

You are trying a Straw Man argument, to try and shut me up, by suggesting that I am pushing for Switzerland to take in 6 million Jewish Germans.

You know damn well your government convened an Inquiry, the Bergier Commission, and concluded that the Swiss government knowingly turned over nearly 25,000 people to the Nazis to face certain death. You know full well, but are withholding it for the forum , that one of the findings was that the Swiss actually asked the Germans in 1938 to add the letter J to passports, so they could easily identify Jews to send back.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/nazis/readings/sinister.html

While happy to accept Jewish capital, the Swiss were less happy to accept Jewish refugees (often their own depositors). It is well known that the Swiss vigorously blocked the entry of Jews attempting to flee Germany and occupied Europe. In 1938 (at the suggestion of Swiss Chief of Police Heinrich Rothmund) Bern requested that Berlin mark the passports of Jews with a "J" - so that German Jews could be instantly distinguished from German gentiles - and be denied admission to Switzerland.

It took the Swiss fifty years to admit any responsibility for wrongdoing. It took the Swiss fifty-five years to exonerate (posthumously) Paul Grueninger, the police chief in the St. Gallen Canton who defied regulations and aided thousands of Austrian Jews in escaping to Switzerland. As a result of his actions, Grueninger was dismissed from the police and convicted of fraud.

Now you will probably pretend that Switzerland had no choice during WW2. But the 1938 request shows that there were parts of the Swiss government likely colluding in what became known as the Final Solution. There was no war at that time.

And you were wittering on about "non-Swiss people". Switzerland is a country where you famously can't decide what language you are supposed to speak, so I doubt there isn't an actual definition of "Swiss" beyond a political construct. Your issue is you came on with some sort of fake ethonationalist rant about foreigners. Granit Xhaka is one of the best footballers Switzerland has ever had. Swiss born, but for you not Swiss, because he is of Albanian extraction and a practicing Muslim.

As a Swiss person, railing against immigration seems a strange hill to die on. Switzerland itself is the product of different peoples, languages and cultures coming together. Which group are you claiming to protect from immigration? The Germans, the French, the Italians, or the Romansh? Switzerland was never a single ethnic nation in the first place. Its success comes from different peoples learning to coexist, not from keeping outsiders out.

Your complaints about too many foreigners sounds exactly like Überfremdungm the sort of language used by would be Nazis like Rolf Henne.

Roadsternut refers to my past in motorracing. There is no intended meaning for you. If it offends you, complain to the site administrators. You can call me RoadsterC**t if you wish.

swissie Platinum Member

swissie

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, jts-khorat said:

That is true, the Alemans immigrated from Southern Scandinavia, so are not "native" to Switzerland at all (in a historic sense).

But moving away from this as an argument, even a playful one in this serious debate (it is as weak as yours): I always wonder when people who have successfully emigrated to a far-away foreign country talk about immigration as if those people were invaders, while in the next breath complaining about Thai visa difficulties, wholly without seeing the irony. Are they too self-consumed, too blind, or just hypocrites, or worse?

I have been to places (in Africa as it were) where I was obviously not welcome, and it sharpened my sense on how that must feel when you are in a minority -- in my case of me alone -- and the shoe is on the other foot.

Also, I have a daughter with my Thai wife, and we currently live in Germany. I am hyper-aware that my daughter could easily be this kind of "unwelcome" foreigner if such politics would gain the upper hand, and maybe her own children and even grandchildren (as she carries the obvious skin, hair and eye phenotypes to make her stand out as different).

So, for somebody who made Thailand his home for a time, or has a Thai partner, such tinking is hypocrisy of the highest kind; if somebody has gone as far as having half-Thai children, this would unmask him as evil in the true sense.

A little footnote. Like it or not. Thai Immigration has decided that Thailand will not be overrun by "foreighners" like this has happened in Switzerland for example.

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, swissie said:

A little footnote. Like it or not. Thai Immigration has decided that Thailand will not be overrun by "foreighners" like this has happened in Switzerland for example.

Following your own reasoning, it has been, albeit three to five generations ago. You do not even identify those Southern Chinese as foreign invaders, do you, even though each gold shop and lots of other enterprises show vividly what happened then by their lettering. Which shows how absurd and historically blind your argument is, both in regard to Thailand and Switzerland.

swissie Platinum Member

swissie

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, jts-khorat said:

Following your own reasoning, it has been, albeit three to five generations ago. You do not even identify those Southern Chinese as foreign invaders, do you, even though each gold shop and lots of other enterprises show vividly what happened then by their lettering. Which shows how absurd and historically blind your argument is, both in regard to Thailand and Switzerland.

Re writing history once more? The "Kelts"/ "the Celtics" lived in Europe long before the Scandinavians foud out that the climate in Europe is more beneficial than in Scandinavia. Furthermore they had nothing. To plunder Europe as the only "business opportunity". To claim, that the "Vikings" were in Europe before the "Kelts" is adventourus "bovine droppings" also known as historical B*ll<deleted>.

Long before the Habsburgs enter the scene the Swiss tribe was called "Helvetians". Nobody knows where they came from, not even the Romans could find out where they came from. They were alway there, long before the Roman Empire existed. But certainly the Swiss have not their roots in Scandinavia.

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, swissie said:

Re writing history once more? The "Kelts"/ "the Celtics" lived in Europe long before the Scandinavians foud out that the climate in Europe is more beneficial than in Scandinavia. Furthermore they had nothing. To plunder Europe as the only "business opportunity". To claim, that the "Vikings" were in Europe before the "Kelts" is adventourus "bovine droppings" also known as historical B*ll<deleted>.

Long before the Habsburgs enter the scene the Swiss tribe was called "Helvetians". Nobody knows where they came from, not even the Romans could find out where they came from. They were alway there, long before the Roman Empire existed. But certainly the Swiss have not their roots in Scandinavia.

What a weird rant.

So, you believe that you are a Helvetian? Maybe coming right from the original Ἐλουητίων ἔρημος of Claudius Ptolemaios?!

I really would like to see your genealogical tree reaching in time past Christ for it to make sense.

Even if true, that makes you now more a person coming from within Germany than ever, havign lived between the Main and the Rhine. They were forced further by germanic tribes (maybe proto-Francs), replacing other Celtic groups then living on the Swiss plateau (the Leponti -- which makes the Helvetii already immigrant invaders). Then they were first crushed by the Romans after pitiful attempts at raiding, later pushed by the Alemannish tribe (which were from southern Scandinavia, as I was alluding) into starvation land in Alpine valleys until their full assimilation.

Ergo, a "civilization" that left nothing more than a name scribbled down as a footnote by their superior foes and a few hill forts that where nothing more than grassy ruins over 2000 years ago. Already for Caesar in 58 BC not important enough to give them space in his own personal history besides mentioning merely two of the four Helvetii sub-tribes by name.

You speak an Alemannish-German sub-dialect as main language in your country, in the other parts sub-dialects of the Roman victors. No trace of any Celtic dialect has survived past Roman times, so: how many words of Gaulish do you speak? Surprise me!

Not sure what the Helvetii people of yesteryears would make of you, could they see you embellish yourself with their heritage, which has, incidentally, only a fleeting connection to the region we call Switzerland today.

And you build your whole sense of self out of such a shaky construct?! I think this is, truly, sad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.