Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Considers Reducing U.S. Troops in Germany

President Donald Trump said the United States is reviewing whether to reduce the number of American troops stationed in Germany, raising fresh questions about Washington’s military posture in Europe and its relationship with NATO allies.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

In a message posted on Truth Social on Wednesday, Donald Trump said the administration was examining the possibility of scaling back forces.

“The United States is studying and reviewing the possible reduction of Troops in Germany, with a determination to be made over the next short period of time,” he wrote.

Background to U.S. presence in Germany

The United States has maintained a large military presence in Germany since the aftermath of World War II and throughout the Cold War. According to figures from the United States Department of Defense, more than 36,000 active-duty American troops were stationed across German bases as of December last year.

In addition to those personnel, roughly 1,500 reservists and about 11,500 civilian employees are also based there. Among foreign countries hosting U.S. forces, only Japan has a larger American troop presence.

Germany hosts several key facilities central to U.S. military operations. The country is home to the headquarters of United States European Command and United States Africa Command, while Ramstein Air Base functions as a major logistics and operational hub.

Tensions over Iran and NATO

The announcement comes amid growing friction between Washington and some European governments over the conflict involving Iran. Several European leaders have been reluctant to support the U.S. approach to the crisis.

Mr Trump has voiced frustration with allies who have distanced themselves from the conflict and has criticised NATO for not joining the war effort, once describing the alliance as a “paper tiger”. A law passed in 2023 prevents a U.S. president from withdrawing from NATO without approval from Congress.

Relations with Berlin have also been strained following remarks by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Earlier this week, he criticised the U.S. handling of the conflict with Iran, saying Washington appeared to lack a clear strategy and suggesting American negotiators were being “humiliated” by their Iranian counterparts.

In response, Mr Trump accused the German leader of misunderstanding the issue and suggested he was tolerant of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons.

“No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both Economically, and otherwise,” the president wrote on social media.

Despite the exchange, Mr Merz told reporters shortly before the troop reduction proposal was raised that he maintained a good relationship with the U.S. president.

Previous disputes over defence spending

Mr Trump’s criticism of NATO predates the current dispute. During both his presidential campaigns and his time in office, he has repeatedly accused member states of failing to meet defence spending commitments and relying too heavily on the United States for security.

In 2020, during the final year of his first administration, he announced plans to withdraw about 12,000 U.S. troops from Germany, arguing that Berlin had not contributed enough to defence spending. The proposal faced opposition from lawmakers in both parties and was later reversed by his successor, Joe Biden.

More recently, in a smaller adjustment last autumn, U.S. officials said about 700 troops deployed across Germany, Romania and Poland would return to the United States.

U.S. Army Europe and Africa said at the time that the move was part of a broader effort to maintain a balanced military presence and did not represent a withdrawal from Europe or a reduced commitment to NATO.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

Close it down. Keep your nose out of world affairs. Can't make the US work so what can you do for the rest of the world.

Tariff bite. My son wanted to send me 3 t-shirts: $24. Post office wants to charge him $40 tariff! Needless to say, he filled a new Customs form, omitting the t-shirts!

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member

I support the US leaving NATO and pulling out of Europe. It's time for Europe to grow up and defend themselves.

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member

Trump coincidentally had a two hour conversation with Putin on Wednesday.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-discussed-ukraine-ceasefire-with-putin-2026-04-29/

That could be bad news. Putin attacked Donbass a few months after he met with Biden in summer 2021. Vlad was obviously shaking in his boots after he met with the old guy with a bad memory.

Regarding the OP, it only makes sense to reduce American presence now that NATO members have pinkie sworn to up their spending and contribute their agreed share. Unless, of course, they had their fingers crossed behind their backs.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
Just now, impulse said:

That could be bad news. Putin attacked Donbass a few months after he met with Biden in summer 2021. Vlad was obviously shaking in his boots after he met with the old guy with a bad memory.

Regarding the OP, it only makes sense to reduce American presence now that NATO members have pinkie sworn to up their spending and contribute their agreed share. Unless, of course, they had their fingers crossed behind their backs.

They could have reduced their presence already many years ago. However that would greatly reduce their influence, therefore it hasn't happened.

But Europe won't reject a reduction.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member

US out of Nato. Finally America and Europe agrees on something here

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member

When will the US and European NATO countries seriously deal with this matter?

Design together a realistic 10 year withdrawal plan, leaving time for European NATO to progressively substitute withdrawn assets.

Of course, neither the US, nor a significant number of European countries are ready for that. The US doesn't really want an independent European defense, and European countries are not currently able to reach a consensus to take over their own defense. 🙂

FlorC Platinum Member

FlorC

Advanced Member

Get them all out , NOW !

No need for US bases in europe (or elsewhere).

still kicking Star Member

still kicking

Advanced Member
Just now, FlorC said:

Get them all out , NOW !

No need for US bases in europe (or elsewhere).

Start with Pine Gap in Australia

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
46 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Close it down. Keep your nose out of world affairs. Can't make the US work so what can you do for the rest of the world.

Tariff bite. My son wanted to send me 3 t-shirts: $24. Post office wants to charge him $40 tariff! Needless to say, he filled a new Customs form, omitting the t-shirts!

Tax evasion. You must be so proud.

Yes Trump should withdraw troops. No point dealing with evil EU member states especially ones with a recent history of antisemitism and Naziism.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
Just now, candide said:

Design together a realistic 10 year withdrawal plan, leaving time for European NATO to progressively substitute withdrawn assets.

Send the moving van, thats the plan.

Put surplus older equipment up for auction.

Just now, JonnyF said:

Yes Trump should withdraw troops. No point dealing with evil EU member states especially ones with a recent history of antisemitism and Naziism

In addition, a deindustrializing continent with few resources defined by ethnic hatred that supports our enemies after decades of sucking off us.

The faster we get out the better. I only hope that England comes to its senses.

Patong2021 Diamond Member

Patong2021

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Close it down. Keep your nose out of world affairs. Can't make the US work so what can you do for the rest of the world.

Tariff bite. My son wanted to send me 3 t-shirts: $24. Post office wants to charge him $40 tariff! Needless to say, he filled a new Customs form, omitting the t-shirts!

Another incoherent statement from you. Identifying the involved countries is necessary.

Son is sending the tshirts from which country to which country?

Which post office is collecting a tariff, and the tariff is charged by which country's revenue/tax department?

1tooth Silver Member

1tooth

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

US out of Nato. Finally America and Europe agrees on something here

Run Forrest, run!

1tooth Silver Member

1tooth

Advanced Member

america is looking pathetic. Too many american soldiers returned from the Middle East in body bags (censored), and america is struggling to replace them. Kudos Iran. ☠️

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
Just now, 1tooth said:

america is looking pathetic. Too many american soldiers returned from the Middle East in body bags (censored), and america is struggling to replace them. Kudos Iran. ☠️

How many?

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, stevenl said:

They could have reduced their presence already many years ago. However that would greatly reduce their influence

This!

Who believes that the US occupiers are there to "protect" the Europeans is a moron. This is solely to project their power.

So, Trump, we Germans call your bluff! Remove the troops. And do not forget to clean up the poisoned soil in your army barracks, this would be a bill for billions in germany and a project taking decades alone.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
Just now, jts-khorat said:

So, Trump, we Germans call your bluff! Remove the troops. And do not forget to clean up the poisoned soil in your army barracks, this would be a bill for billions in germany and a project taking decades alone.

You guys should consider yourselves lucky we didnt plow under your cities and sow salt. Lucky for you the commies were a threat and we thought we would need some cannon fodder again since you arent worth much militarily other than that.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
Just now, Yagoda said:

You guys should consider yourselves lucky we didnt plow under your cities and sow salt. Lucky for you the commies were a threat and we thought we would need some cannon fodder again since you arent worth much militarily other than that.

That's rich, coming from you, Comrade.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member

Worth remembering that Ramstein is the first place injured US troops are evacuated to from the Middle East.

Landstuhl is essential for grieviously injured troops who won't survive direct evactuation to Walter Reed. If Landstuhl was shut down, which in itself is probsably a $500m cost, the US will likely need to expand medical facilties elsewhere in Europe, such as RAF Lakenheath or NAS Sigonella, so another $2-3 billion cost.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
Just now, Roadsternut said:

That's rich, coming from you, Comrade.

Why? You dont think the US government seriously discussed laying waste to the German economy? Shicklgruber sure wanted to

Just now, Roadsternut said:

Worth remembering that Ramstein is the first place injured US troops are evacuated to from the Middle East.

Landstuhl is essential for grieviously injured troops who won't survive direct evactuation to Walter Reed. If Landstuhl was shut down, which in itself is probsably a $500m cost, the US will likely need to expand medical facilties elsewhere in Europe, such as RAF Lakenheath or NAS Sigonella, so another $2-3 billion cost.

Costs $235 million to build a 40 bed hospital. We dont need any in the EU because we wont be taking casualties for Europe. We can put one up at Incirlik

We can fly any injuries for now that require intensive care to Sheba in Tel Aviv, not only one of the best hospitals in the world but set up for military casualties. Im sure our dependable allies Israel would allow us to set up a medical wing to perform the same thing that Ramstein does.

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
Just now, Roadsternut said:

Worth remembering that Ramstein is the first place injured US troops are evacuated to from the Middle East.

Landstuhl is essential for grieviously injured troops who won't survive direct evactuation to Walter Reed. If Landstuhl was shut down, which in itself is probsably a $500m cost, the US will likely need to expand medical facilties elsewhere in Europe, such as RAF Lakenheath or NAS Sigonella, so another $2-3 billion cost.

That would be just another two days of war with Iran, so I am sure Trump is good with that.

But if you think that shuttign down a base like Ramstein is just half a billion dollars you are dead wrong -- if you not just mean, packing things up and flying people out.

Instead it would mean to take off the topsoil down to the groundwater table or more for the whole area under American control, leech out heavy metals, chemical and nuclear contaminants -- because the Americans have behaved there as if there were no environmental laws in Germany, it is basically unliveable there -- then refill the land back up, replant it, etc. We are talking tens of billions and decades of work here, and the USA has dozens of such installations in Germany alone.

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, candide said:

When will the US and European NATO countries seriously deal with this matter?

Design together a realistic 10 year withdrawal plan, leaving time for European NATO to progressively substitute withdrawn assets.

Of course, neither the US, nor a significant number of European countries are ready for that. The US doesn't really want an independent European defense, and European countries are not currently able to reach a consensus to take over their own defense. 🙂

I support a 100 percent withdrawal ASAP. Europe hates the USA and Europe can pound sand.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
Just now, jts-khorat said:

That would be just another two days of war with Iran, so I am sure Trump is good with that.

But if you think that shuttign down a base like Ramstein is just half a billion dollars you are dead wrong -- if you not just mean, packing things up and flying people out.

Instead it would mean to take off the topsoil down to the groundwater table or more for the whole area under American control, leech out heavy metals, chemical and nuclear contaminants -- because the Americans have behaved there as if there were no environmental laws in Germany, it is basically unliveable there -- then refill the land back up, replant it, etc. We are talking tens of billions and decades of work here, and the USA has dozens of such installations in Germany alone.

Who is going to make us do that?

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
Just now, TedG said:

I support a 100 percent withdrawal ASAP. Europe hates the USA and Europe can pound sand.

Everybody hates America these days. It's not as if it's been much help of late, so on behalf of all Europeans I know, America should GTFO.

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
Just now, gargamon said:

Everybody hates America these days. It's not as if it's been much help of late, so on behalf of all Europeans I know, America should GTFO.

I 100 percent support the US leaving the irrelevant and dying continent known as Europe.

webfact Grand Master Member

webfact

Admin

RELATED STORY:

air-base.jpg

The United States will withdraw about 5,000 troops from Germany following an order from President Donald Trump, marking a significant shift in the American military presence in Europe amid rising tensions with Berlin.

The move, confirmed by the Pentagon on Friday, comes as relations between Washington and the German government led by Friedrich Merz have deteriorated in recent days.

https://aseannow.com/topic/1393632-trump-orders-troop-withdrawal-from-germany/

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member

Good speed it up

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
Just now, Yagoda said:

Good speed it up

Send all the troops home.

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
Just now, jts-khorat said:

This!

Who believes that the US occupiers are there to "protect" the Europeans is a moron. This is solely to project their power.

So, Trump, we Germans call your bluff! Remove the troops. And do not forget to clean up the poisoned soil in your army barracks, this would be a bill for billions in germany and a project taking decades alone.

I support every US service members going home. Let Europe defend themselves. Losers

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member

Come Tuesday it will be TACO time again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.