Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Erupts After House Delivers Iran War Rebuke

US President Donald Trump has criticised lawmakers who backed a House measure aimed at limiting his authority to continue military action against Iran, describing the vote as "unpatriotic" and singling out four Republican members who joined Democrats in support of the resolution.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The US House of Representatives approved the measure on Wednesday by a 215-208 vote. The resolution seeks to require Trump either to withdraw US forces involved in the conflict or obtain congressional approval for any further military action.

In a post on Truth Social on Thursday, Trump condemned the vote, arguing it came at a critical stage in efforts to end the conflict.

"Yesterday, in a meaningless vote, the House voted, 4 bad Republicans and all of the Dumocrats, to limit my War Powers, right in the middle of my final negotiations to end the War with the Islamic Republic of Iran," he wrote. "Who would do such an unpatriotic thing."

White House Pushback

The White House has dismissed the resolution, arguing that it lacks meaningful effect and represents an unconstitutional attempt to restrict presidential authority.

The measure adopted by the House is a concurrent resolution. If it also passes the Republican-controlled Senate, it would not require the president's signature to take effect. However, its legal standing could face challenges.

Trump continued his criticism in the same social media post, accusing Democrats of opposing him for political reasons and directing particular anger at the Republican lawmakers who broke ranks.

"The Democrats are fueled by Trump Derangement Syndrome. They would rather have our Country fail than give me another, of many, victories," he wrote.

Referring to the four Republicans who supported the resolution, Trump added: "They're GRANDSTANDERS! They should be ashamed of themselves."

Growing Pressure Over the War

The House vote marked the fourth effort by lawmakers to curb Trump's war powers during the conflict. A similar resolution advanced in the Senate in May, although senators have not yet held a final vote on the measure.

While the resolution is widely viewed as largely symbolic, its passage increases political pressure on the administration as concerns over the war grow. Rising petrol prices and increasing public opposition have added to scrutiny of the White House's handling of the conflict.

The vote also highlighted divisions within the Republican Party. It came shortly after a separate dispute in Congress led the administration to abandon plans for a $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund intended to support political allies.

Republican Split Emerges

The four Republicans who voted in favour of the resolution were Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Tom Barrett of Michigan and Warren Davidson of Ohio. They joined all House Democrats in supporting the measure.

Democrat Jared Golden of Maine, who had opposed similar efforts in the past, also voted in favour this time.

Barrett defended his decision, arguing that Congress has a constitutional role in authorising war.

"Congress alone declares war, that's something certainly we need to be protective of," he said.

Asked whether he feared retaliation from Trump, Barrett replied: "I vote my conscience for what I think is right and willing to accept that."

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 June 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Caldera said:

Right in the middle of his final negotiations, hear hear. I think that deal is materializing in his imagination only. It's about time he's put on a short leash by Congress!

What congress !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what is the point Trump has the power of veto !

Red Forever Gold Member

Red Forever

Advanced Member
On 6/5/2026 at 9:16 AM, cdulaney said:

Just like a Liberal to ask only questions and never have answers.

Just like a rightard to not understand the word “rhetorical”

Effective altruism Silver Member

Effective altruism

Advanced Member
On 6/5/2026 at 12:54 PM, unblocktheplanet said:

And how are ordinary Americans benefitting from all this???

The people build things. Have you ever worked in the private sector?

Effective altruism Silver Member

Effective altruism

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

What congress !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what is the point Trump has the power of veto !

Congress has the power to override a veto. Read Article I, Section 7 of the US Constitution.

rickudon Gold Member

rickudon

Advanced Member

Trump as usual throwing tantrums. Whatever damage his war is doing to the USA, half the world (those without big oil reserves) are suffering twice as much. Countries like the Philippines, which only has 3 weeks supply left before everything shuts down.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Effective altruism said:

The people build things. Have you ever worked in the private sector?

Ya mean the people who build killing machines and weapons of mass destruction? Arms dealer and private prisons are the only growth industries in the "private sector".

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
On 6/6/2026 at 12:41 PM, MikeandDow said:

There are approx 5.6million Americans who cannot vote

read the "save act" there are Americans who do not have passports nor access to birth cert to id to be able to vote ! Felons in certain state can vote ! think there are 5 states felons can vote the rest cannot, Americans living in the territories cannot vote Puerto Rico,US Virgin Islands,Northern Marianas Islands,American Samoa

and you are going to say "Constitution says only states get to have electoral college votes and these are territories" well that is incorrect ! The District of Columbia, with a population of 712,816 - that’s 4.5 times SMALLER than Puerto Rico - and also not a state, gets 3 electoral college votes, via the 23rd Amendment. ??? is this Fair !!

Okay, I'll bite. Amd how do you plan to enfranchise all those voters (assuming they're not so discouraged as to not vote like me)?

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Okay, I'll bite. Amd how do you plan to enfranchise all those voters (assuming they're not so discouraged as to not vote like me)?

First off, if you don't vote, you got no right to complain!!

Not voting can be seen as neglecting your civil duty to show respect for the government and each other to uphold our society.

The whole point of voting is that everybody participates. This kind of political system has long been fought for, many men and plenty of women and children have died resisting tyrants who never wanted a system like this.

Having a system that allows everyone to participate is a huge achievement, and some people squander it like nobody ever suffered for it.

As for a Plan ! it is not my place !! I am not a "Yank" it is up to the American people ALL to fix ! the starting point would be get rid of the save Act ! oh I see it has been defeted

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

First off, if you don't vote, you got no right to complain!!

Not voting can be seen as neglecting your civil duty to show respect for the government and each other to uphold our society.

The whole point of voting is that everybody participates. This kind of political system has long been fought for, many men and plenty of women and children have died resisting tyrants who never wanted a system like this.

Having a system that allows everyone to participate is a huge achievement, and some people squander it like nobody ever suffered for it.

As for a Plan ! it is not my place !! I am not a "Yank" it is up to the American people ALL to fix ! the starting point would be get rid of the save Act ! oh I see it has been defeted

Hehe, you sound like my 8th grade Civics teacher!

I wasn’t complaining. It was you who suggest the US could effect change by enfranchising those who are now disenfranchised.

How?

“Long been fought for”—we have a fundamental disagreement here. I don’t think wars are worth fighting because they never achieve long-term results. In fact, I might say that the US has reached its current deplorable state because of its participation in useless wars.

Hehe, you’re not a Yanq and I’m an ex-Yanq! 5555

I would vote, but only if there were a true statesman-woman running. Those are as rare as jackalopes.

Govts never did anything for me. I’d block a nuke, block an oil pipeline. That’s my role.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
52 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Hehe, you sound like my 8th grade Civics teacher!

I wasn’t complaining. It was you who suggest the US could effect change by enfranchising those who are now disenfranchised.

How?

“Long been fought for”—we have a fundamental disagreement here. I don’t think wars are worth fighting because they never achieve long-term results. In fact, I might say that the US has reached its current deplorable state because of its participation in useless wars.

Hehe, you’re not a Yanq and I’m an ex-Yanq! 5555

I would vote, but only if there were a true statesman-woman running. Those are as rare as jackalopes.

Govts never did anything for me. I’d block a nuke, block an oil pipeline. That’s my role.

I find that statement totally wrong "I don’t think wars are worth fighting because they never achieve long-term results. " so you don't believe in American democratic the men woman who died to give you your right to freedom and free speech

The human condition precludes us, as a species, from absolute peace. There exist always those would see their own gain at the great expense of another, and, unfortunately, many of those people must be destroyed in order for the rest of us to have what peace we can

Maybe you should have listened to your 8th grade teacher

and Yes America needs to change !! not only in attitude but its political system,you clearly have a insane person as president with nuke codes is that a good thing ?? what are you Americans doing about it ??

Effective altruism Silver Member

Effective altruism

Advanced Member
22 hours ago, Effective altruism said:

Congress has the power to override a veto. Read Article I, Section 7 of the US Constitution.

@MikeandDow What is unclear about this?

Effective altruism Silver Member

Effective altruism

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Govts never did anything for me. I’d block a nuke, block an oil pipeline. That’s my role.

Nothing? No education? No roads? Nothing?  Are you collecting Social Security?

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
12 hours ago, Effective altruism said:

@MikeandDow What is unclear about this?

The House of Representatives and the Senate must vote to pass the legislation by a two-thirds majority. BUT cannot override a pocket vetoes is that clear now ! the last time this happened was in 2021 so not a every day occurrence

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.