Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Orders Limits On Birthright Citizenship

President Trump signed two executive orders on Thursday aimed at tightening eligibility for automatic citizenship for children born in the United States, following a Supreme Court ruling that upheld the constitutional basis for birthright citizenship.

Supreme Court Ruling Spurs new Moves

In late June, the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s previous “Day 1” order, which sought to end citizenship by birth for children born on US soil. The court said the plan conflicted with the 14th Amendment, which protects the citizenship rights of people born in the country.

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump said the Supreme Court decision was “unfortunate” and described it as close, adding that he would make “adjustments” because he believed the outcome was unfair.

Expanding Who Could Be Barred From Automatic Citizenship

One of the new orders broadens the category of people said to be ineligible for automatic citizenship. According to administration officials, the order would treat certain groups as not covered by the Citizenship Clause, including “alien enemies of the United States”, members of foreign terrorist organisations, and “large categories of people who lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments”.

Officials said the move is intended to work around the framework used by courts to identify exceptions to birthright citizenship. Courts have long recognised four exceptions tied to the Citizenship Clause: children born in the US to foreign sovereigns and diplomats, now referenced in the order; children born to foreign forces during a hostile occupation; children born on foreign public ships; and children of Native American tribes.

It was unclear, however, how the administration would determine who would fall within the description of people who “lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments” or how that would apply in practice.

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said the order ensures that “large numbers” who would otherwise qualify for birthright citizenship would no longer be eligible for benefits.

Order Targets “Birth Tourism” Practice

The second executive order focuses on what the administration calls “birth tourism”. The practice involves travelling to another country with the primary purpose of giving birth there so that the child automatically becomes a citizen of that country.

US law already makes such conduct illegal when it involves visa or immigration fraud, and the practice has become a political focus for the right. Trump said birthright citizenship was originally intended for “the babies of slaves”. He argued that recent patterns were different, alleging that “wealthy people” have built businesses around the practice and that the US should not allow it.

He also claimed that “hundreds of thousands” take advantage of birth tourism, though data cited in the article suggests those estimates are inflated.

Trump said the original policy applied shortly after the Civil War ended, adding that it was not intended for families he described as arriving with multiple children.

Citing Immigration Law For Denying Visas

Miller said Trump has authority to pursue the new approach under Section 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. He described it as a provision that governs the travel of non-citizens into and out of the country and said it is rarely used.

Miller argued that if someone tells a consular officer they are coming as a tourist but intends to give birth for the purpose of securing citizenship for the child, they are committing fraud against the government. He said, based on that reasoning, the relevant visa “can and should and will be now denied”.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

7 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

FinChin67 Gold Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member

Chinese are the biggest abusers of this and this no surprise. I really hope Trump succeeds and closes all these loopholes! Of course democrats oppose this as common sense does not apply to them.

This is facilitated by specialized agencies offering packages that typically include visas, housing (“maternity hotels” or “baby houses”), prenatal care, postpartum recovery (zuoyuezi), and help obtaining the child’s documents.

Here's few examples. Southern California (especially Los Angeles and Irvine area): The largest and most established hub. Agencies and operators ran networks of apartments and “maternity hotels.” Packages commonly cost $40,000–$100,000 and included housing, nannies, shopping trips, and logistical support.


In 2015 and 2019, U.S. federal authorities raided multiple operations targeting Chinese clients who had obtained visitor visas by misrepresenting the purpose and length of their trips. One major case involved operators who charged tens of thousands of dollars and housed women for months. Similar networks have operated in other places, including New York (Flushing, Queens), with dozens of private homes advertised in Chinese-language media.

Industry and some Chinese sources have claimed tens of thousands of Chinese births per year at peaks.

Saipan (Northern Mariana Islands – U.S. territory) where Chinese women have used relatively easy or visa-free access (historically up to 45 days under special programs) to give birth on Saipan, securing U.S. citizenship for the child at lower cost than the mainland.

Oh and in Canada it's Richmond (suburb of Vancouver) and British Columbia. A major concentration of “baby houses” catering mainly to Chinese mothers. Non-resident births have formed a significant share of deliveries at local hospitals.

They did that to Hong Kong too 2000's and early 2010. Hong Kong imposed "Zero quota" in 2013.


PingRoundTheWorld Gold Member

PingRoundTheWorld

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

But that's not why he's doing it, to become more European, more Asian. He's doing it so America becomes more white.

Your point being? Thailand is 95% Thai. Japan is 97% Japanese. China is 91% Chinese. What's the problem with America being white?

4 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

Unrestricted Jus Soli (Birthright citizenship) is practiced by about about 35 countries. You are a liar when you claim Europe and Asia does not practice this.

There is no country in Europe or Asia where a pregnant African (as an example) can travel to, give birth, and the child will automatically be a citizen. Unconditional Jus Soli is almost exclusively limited to the Americas and a few countries in Africa. None in Europe or Asia except Pakistan. Thailand? Japan? China? Hell no!

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
21 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

Chinese are the biggest abusers of this and this no surprise. I really hope Trump succeeds and closes all these loopholes! Of course democrats oppose this as common sense does not apply to them.

This is facilitated by specialized agencies offering packages that typically include visas, housing (“maternity hotels” or “baby houses”), prenatal care, postpartum recovery (zuoyuezi), and help obtaining the child’s documents.

Here's few examples. Southern California (especially Los Angeles and Irvine area): The largest and most established hub. Agencies and operators ran networks of apartments and “maternity hotels.” Packages commonly cost $40,000–$100,000 and included housing, nannies, shopping trips, and logistical support.


In 2015 and 2019, U.S. federal authorities raided multiple operations targeting Chinese clients who had obtained visitor visas by misrepresenting the purpose and length of their trips. One major case involved operators who charged tens of thousands of dollars and housed women for months. Similar networks have operated in other places, including New York (Flushing, Queens), with dozens of private homes advertised in Chinese-language media.

Industry and some Chinese sources have claimed tens of thousands of Chinese births per year at peaks.

Saipan (Northern Mariana Islands – U.S. territory) where Chinese women have used relatively easy or visa-free access (historically up to 45 days under special programs) to give birth on Saipan, securing U.S. citizenship for the child at lower cost than the mainland.

Oh and in Canada it's Richmond (suburb of Vancouver) and British Columbia. A major concentration of “baby houses” catering mainly to Chinese mothers. Non-resident births have formed a significant share of deliveries at local hospitals.

They did that to Hong Kong too 2000's and early 2010. Hong Kong imposed "Zero quota" in 2013.


Are the Chinese doing anything illegal?

Ralf001 Star Member

Ralf001

Advanced Member

Another attempt to be rid of the Mexicans!

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, PingRoundTheWorld said:

Your point being? Thailand is 95% Thai. Japan is 97% Japanese. China is 91% Chinese. What's the problem with America being white?

Youe reply proves my point.

The Native Americans would state there is a big effing problem with America being White. That came about because you killed most of them off.

And you have come out without apology. You are a White Supremacist, who believes Blacks, Hispanics and other minorities have no place in America. Laura Loomer previously called for the incarceration of the entire hispanic population.

I have no interest in further discussion with a self confessed White Supremacist, so you will be added to my blocked list. Ta ta. Go shout at the moon for all I care. We beat you lot in 1945, we'll do it again. Your views will not prevail.

PingRoundTheWorld Gold Member

PingRoundTheWorld

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

I have no interest in further discussion with a self confessed White Supremacist, so you will be added to my blocked list. Ta ta. Go shout at the moon for all I care. We beat you lot in 1945, we'll do it again. Your views will not prevail.

Amazing deduction powers Sherlock. I'm American by (legal) immigration, and most of my grandparents' families were killed by the Nazis for being Jewish. But go ahead with the "everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi" BS.

7 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

You are a White Supremacist, who believes Blacks, Hispanics and other minorities have no place in America.

You're the one who said that - not me. I 100% believe in equal opportunity and freedom for minorities who are already citizens. That does not mean we should allow low IQ uneducated unskilled hordes who do not share our culture to inflitrate unchecked. Race is irrelevant (you are the one insisting on making it about race!). America has a right to protect its borders and its citizens. Period.

P.S. YOU didn't beat anyone in 1945. Your grandparents' generation did, and they would be HORRIFIED by the progressive/communist agenda and propaganda that infiltrated the US in recent decades. It would be outright rejected by anyone who fought in 1945.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.