Trump Shares Edited Video Portraying King Charles as Uncaring

9 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

The king should sue Trump for $10 billion

It's the king, not the ginger stepchild.

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

1688 English Bill of Rights!

"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. So help me God."

And that is in which way related to the King caring for Muslim UK citizens?

Just now, BritManToo said:

The British throne was offered under those conditions.

Islam is a foreign ecclesiatical or spititual authority.

Read again. Muslims are a religion

3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Muslim UK citizens

1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

Read again. Muslims are a religion

Never been any right to freedom of religion in the UK

The throne was created (after Cromwell) to defend the Anglican Church (aka CoE)

Catholics were (and still are) prohibited from being Prime Minister in the UK.

Which is why Tony Blair converted to Catholicism after standing down as PM.

And you claim I am stupid?

Edited 22 hours ago22 hr by BritManToo

5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

So Charles has forsaken his right to rule.

King Charles never had the right to rule.

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Does anybody seriously think Trump sits there editing videos of Charles? It's obviously his team of social media monkeys who posts this. People take this too seriously.

And he never bombed anyone either, other people do that and he probably never ever posted anything and just gives the ok.

3 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Never been any right to freedom of religion in the UK

The throne was created to defend the Anglican Church (aka CoE)

Catholics were (and still are) prohibited from being Prime Minister in the UK.

Which is why Tony Blair converted to Catholicism after standing down as PM.

And you claim I am stupid?

Showing your ignorance, or is it real stupidity, again.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/freedom-of-religion-or-belief-understanding-this-human-right

Freedom of religion or belief: why it matters

The right to adopt a religion or belief, to practise it without hindrance, to share your faith and to change your religion or beliefs are all key freedoms that everyone should be able to enjoy. The UK government is committed to defending freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) for all and promoting respect between different religious and non-religious communities.

Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) is a human right which has been guaranteed under international law within the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) since 1966. Article 18 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, states that ‘everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion’.

What FoRB is

FoRB is not just the freedom to hold personal thoughts and convictions, but also being able to express them individually or with others, publicly or in private. It includes the freedom to:

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

If "Muslims are a religion" (I presume you mean Islam is a religion but I'll ignore your lack of education again), then why is criticism of it labelled as racism? 😄

Showing your ignorance again jonny?

is someone who is against muslims a racist

AI Overview

Being against Muslims is widely considered a form of racism or bigotry because it treats a diverse group of people as if they share fixed, negative traits based on their appearance or background. [1]

Why It Is Linked to Racism

• Islam is a religion, not a race. Anyone of any race can be a Muslim.

• Targeting people by looks. People who oppose Muslims often judge individuals by their skin color, clothing, names, or ethnic background.

• Hurting non-practicing people. People who do not practice Islam are still targeted if others think they look or act Muslim. [1, 2]

Troll post removed @JonnyF if you attempt to change a poster’s name again to troll, then expect further action.

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

If "Muslims are a religion" (I presume you mean Islam is a religion but I'll ignore your lack of education again), then why is criticism of it labelled as racism? 😄

Not content to insert off topic Muslims/Islam into the discussion you now add off topic racism.

Edited 21 hours ago21 hr by Chomper Higgot

33 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Does anybody seriously think Trump sits there editing videos of Charles? It's obviously his team of social media monkeys who posts this. People take this too seriously.

And Trump will surely fire them for making posts with an edited video smearing the head of state of a key US ally, under his own name!

Oh wait! 😆

39 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Of course it isn't Trump himself, as he is even too dumb to change his own pampers. It is his media team that takes orders from him

Well, until you can produce the specific order from Trump where he asked his team to edit a video with Charles clearly Trump is innocent of all charges. I strongly suspect Trump didn't even know that video existed.

4 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

The king should sue Trump for $10 billion

Indeed, the BBC's lawyers are no doubt taking note.

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

Well, until you can produce the specific order from Trump where he asked his team to edit a video with Charles clearly Trump is innocent of all charges. I strongly suspect Trump didn't even know that video existed.

That’s not a strong endorsement of his mental acuity if doesn’t know the video exists but post nevertheless. Trump does display at times that he don’t know where he or the name of the person in front of him.

57 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not content to insert off topic Muslims/Islam into the discussion you now add off topic racism.

No, CallumWK did that, Higgot. Read slowly.

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

No, CallumWK did that, Higgot. Read slowly.

They are slow enough as it is.