Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

UK Police Told to Act Tough on Anti-Migrant Protests

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has told police chiefs to learn lessons from last weekend’s anti-migrant protests in Dover and Portsmouth, and to use “all powers necessary” when dealing with future demonstrations.

In a meeting on Thursday, Mahmood asked for assurances that plans were in place for forces to respond quickly and effectively to far-right groups she said were seeking to intimidate communities.

Unacceptable Disorder in Dover and Portsmouth

On Saturday, masked protesters brought Dover to a standstill, blocking access to a nationally critical road serving the port. The following day in Portsmouth, around 200 people tried to stop migrants being driven away for processing.

The Home Office said the protests involved “unacceptable disorder”. It added that some protesters were dressed in black and wearing balaclavas, creating what Mahmood described as a “fear factor” and an intent to intimidate residents.

Mahmood said the incidents were different from other protests and needed a response shaped by those circumstances.

Face Coverings Ban Under Review

The BBC understands police leaders are now actively considering recently granted powers that would allow them to ban face coverings in specific areas during protests, in response to the behaviour seen in Dover and Portsmouth.

Mahmood also raised concerns about how quickly police could act when demonstrators tried to disrupt the movement of people and block routes used for processing migrants.

A further incident followed shortly after the Dover protest. Men blocked the only road out of Langstone Harbour near Portsmouth after the RNLI brought 120 migrants ashore.

It is not yet clear whether further demonstrations will be held. In some areas of England, local groups linked to the Patriot Platform umbrella have called for more rallies.

Intelligence, Planning and Public Order Powers

The meeting discussed the emergence of Patriot Platform, with ministers believing it aims to intimidate communities. Mahmood told police chiefs they should make better use of intelligence to improve preparedness ahead of this weekend.

Her comments came after Kent Police previously said it had been aware of a possible demonstration in Dover, but had not “fully assessed” the warning before the port road was brought to a standstill.

During the meeting, Mahmood said the government expected police to use their full powers and to take robust action against any criminal offences.

After the talks, Deputy Chief Constable Andy Mariner, the National Police Chiefs Council lead for public order, said forces were continually assessing and preparing for protests and any impact on public safety. He said this includes working with local forces, specialist teams, communities and partners to ensure support is available when needed.

Mariner added that the priority was to keep people safe, maintain public order and support the right to peaceful and lawful protest, while people committing criminal offences could “expect police action”.

New Rules for Blocking Critical Infrastructure

Major changes to protest law introduced over the last three years allow officers to intervene more quickly where demonstrations block critical national infrastructure, including roads used by ports. Officers can also designate an area as a face mask-free zone for the duration of a protest.

Police chiefs said they have launched an “enhanced and co-ordinated” approach to gathering intelligence in the days ahead.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

11 September 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

nauseus Star Member

nauseus

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

How do you think they will manage that?

You do know there are more British citizens, and yes some are natural born citizens with long lineage, freeloading than there are immigrants doing the same, don't you?

Those immigrants aren't the same. They are not British, you burke,

cjinchiangrai Platinum Member

cjinchiangrai

Advanced Member

More hard right nonsense being driven by Russian propaganda.

nauseus Star Member

nauseus

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

I was referring to the sentence " all the freeloaders living off us will be removed". Idiot.

That was part of a sentence written by Barra Marra, who was obviously referring to the illegal migrants who have entered the UK relatively recently but not the long-existing social welfare leeches of British and other ancestry. You have erroneously combined the two groups.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
(edited)
17 hours ago, nauseus said:

Those immigrants aren't the same. They are not British, you burke,


Oh dear, another one falls. They're all the same - just patriots protecting our wimmin and children.......in-between beating them up and raping them.

https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/crime/predatory-waterlooville-paedophile-was-found-guilty-of-raping-a-child-after-a-trial-9046514



WhatsApp Image 2026-09-15 at 19.09.27 (1).jpeg

WhatsApp Image 2026-09-15 at 19.09.28.jpeg

WhatsApp Image 2026-09-15 at 19.09.27.jpeg

Edited by josephbloggs

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, nauseus said:

That was part of a sentence written by Barra Marra, who was obviously referring to the illegal migrants who have entered the UK relatively recently but not the long-existing social welfare leeches of British and other ancestry. You have erroneously combined the two groups.

Incorrect. The poster you mention is often ambiguous in his comment. I askedhim a question regarding freeloaders in order to give him the opportunity to be more precise.

There's no error in my part.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
57 minutes ago, nauseus said:

You don't have a good reason to put this post in as a reply to one of mine. Do you?

No, I didn't, and it was a mistake. I was replying to "More hard right nonsense being driven by Russian propaganda." by @cjinchiangrai Or at least I thought I was.

So apologies, was not supposed to be a reply to you.

nauseus Star Member

nauseus

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

Incorrect. The poster you mention is often ambiguous in his comment. I askedhim a question regarding freeloaders in order to give him the opportunity to be more precise.

There's no error in my part.

Now you are just lying. Go away.

nauseus Star Member

nauseus

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

No, I didn't, and it was a mistake. I was replying to "More hard right nonsense being driven by Russian propaganda." by @cjinchiangrai Or at least I thought I was.

So apologies, was not supposed to be a reply to you.

Thanks.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
39 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Now you are just lying. Go away.

No, I'm not lying.

BarraMarra Ruby Member

BarraMarra

Advanced Member

Your just trying to wind up members again youravin. If you want to participate in this thread at least post on the topic, look at the top of the page remind yourself what it is and tell your mate to stop deflecting from the thread.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
10 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Your just trying to wind up members again youravin. If you want to participate in this thread at least post on the topic, look at the top of the page remind yourself what it is and tell your mate to stop deflecting from the thread.

I am on topic. I was replying to your vague post to get clarification.

If that winds you up, I suggest you make your comments more precise.

The Cyclist Platinum Member

The Cyclist

Advanced Member

This is why people are protesting about Channel migrants, which is not the same as legal migration

The government’s “one in, one out” deal is costing about £56,000 for every person sent back to France, Shabana Mahmood has told MPs.

The home secretary disclosed the figure as she was questioned by the home affairs select committee over whether the scheme was delivering value for taxpayers.

About 1,400 people have been removed to France by the Home Office since the scheme began in August 2025,

Somebody can do the arithmetic.

Close to £80 million to get rid of 1400 Illegals.

The Cyclist Platinum Member

The Cyclist

Advanced Member
On 9/14/2026 at 9:47 PM, youreavinalaff said:

How do you think they will manage that?

The quick answer would be to declare an Emergency under the National Security Act.

And get what's left of the Military to rattle up Internment camps on MOD land.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
42 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

The quick answer would be to declare an Emergency under the National Security Act.

And get what's left of the Military to rattle up Internment camps on MOD land.

Under what grounds?

The Cyclist Platinum Member

The Cyclist

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Under what grounds?

The crime statistics that both the Home Office and the Police refuse to publish.

The 1st duty of any Government is the safety and security of its citizens.

Those 2 will do, without even thinking about it.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, The Cyclist said:

The crime statistics that both the Home Office and the Police refuse to publish.

The 1st duty of any Government is the safety and security of its citizens.

Those 2 will do, without even thinking about it.

There are crime statistics issued quite often.

Around 88% of UK crimes are committed by British citizens.

So, what grounds would a government have for proceeding with your plan?

The Cyclist Platinum Member

The Cyclist

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

There are crime statistics issued quite often.

Sure

The UK government is currently appealing a regulatory ruling that ordered the publication of detailed conviction statistics broken down by nationality

Full details can be found on the ICO website.

Now the only reason I can see for appealing a ruling, is that the statistics are absolutely horrendous. Or else they would take great delight in publishing them.

12 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

So, what grounds would a government have for proceeding with your plan?

I thought I had explained that in very simple words.

The 1st duty of any Government is the safety and security of its citizens.

It really does not get more simple than that.

BarraMarra Ruby Member

BarraMarra

Advanced Member

Cyclist you won't get an answer from this poster he will just keep going on and on and on next he will ask for linkstill you get fed up and move on. He will deliberatly refute any post's you put up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.