Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

U.S. Launches Largest-Ever Citizenship Revocation Drive

The Trump administration has launched what officials describe as the largest effort to strip U.S. citizenship from naturalized Americans accused of fraud or other serious offenses, filing cases against 17 people in courts across the country.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The move marks a significant expansion of the government's use of denaturalization powers, a legal process that allows authorities to seek the removal of citizenship from foreign-born Americans who are found to have obtained it unlawfully.

Broadening denaturalization efforts

The Justice Department announced the latest cases on Monday, following an earlier round of denaturalization actions unveiled last month. Officials said the new filings represent the largest single effort of their kind by the federal government.

Denaturalization has long been permitted under U.S. law, but it has historically been used sparingly. Government records indicate that between 1990 and 2017, the Justice Department filed an average of 11 denaturalization complaints each year.

To succeed, federal authorities must convince a judge that a naturalized citizen obtained citizenship through fraud, misrepresentation or concealment of important information. The process can take place through civil or criminal proceedings in federal court.

Cases target fraud and serious crimes

According to court filings, the administration argues that the 17 individuals either concealed criminal conduct during the naturalization process or otherwise failed to meet eligibility requirements for citizenship.

Federal officials said some of those targeted were convicted of violent crimes, including sexual offenses involving children. Others were accused or convicted of fraud-related offenses or immigration violations.

Among those named in the latest filings are a Haitian-born man accused of sexually abusing his daughter; a man from the former Yugoslavia convicted of sexually abusing a child under 15; a Mexican-born immigrant convicted of receiving sexually explicit images of minors; a former Catholic priest from Colombia accused of child sexual abuse; and a Filipino-born man who pleaded guilty to a child sex offense.

The cases also include an Indian-born immigrant accused of submitting fraudulent H-1B visa petitions, the daughter of a Colombian drug trafficker accused of money laundering, a Jamaican-born man convicted of wire fraud, and a Cuban-born woman accused of defrauding a tribal casino. Other individuals were accused of using false identities.

Part of wider immigration crackdown

The initiative forms part of the administration's broader immigration agenda. Since returning to office last year, President Donald Trump has pledged a major expansion of immigration enforcement, including deportations.

In 2025, the Justice Department widened the categories of naturalized citizens considered priorities for denaturalization proceedings. Last month's announcement of 12 cases was described at the time as the largest such action in years.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the department would continue pursuing cases involving individuals accused of abusing the naturalization system.

"Criminal aliens are lying about their past crimes, including drug dealers, sexual predators, and fraudsters," Blanche said.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said citizenship must be obtained honestly and pledged continued use of legal tools to pursue denaturalization where appropriate.

Legal process remains available

Those facing denaturalization proceedings can challenge the government's claims in court and seek to keep their citizenship.

If a court revokes a person's citizenship, they return to their previous immigration status, which is typically lawful permanent residency. They also lose the protections and benefits associated with U.S. citizenship, including immunity from deportation.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 9 June 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

HappyExpat57 Ruby Member

HappyExpat57

Advanced Member

I can't stand this administration for what they are doing with ICE among other things.

Having said that, if what they claim is true:

"17 individuals either concealed criminal conduct during the naturalization process or otherwise failed to meet eligibility requirements for citizenship."

then I don't see how anyone can have a problem with that.

Jim Waldron Silver Member

Jim Waldron

Advanced Member

"...To succeed, federal authorities must convince a judge that a naturalized citizen obtained citizenship through fraud, misrepresentation or concealment of important information..."!

If so, then the denaturalization standard hasn’t changed. There’s no new statute, no new authority, no broadened legal test.

What has changed though, is this administration’s decision to treat denaturalization as a routine enforcement tool rather than a last‑resort measure.

Caldera Ruby Member

Caldera

Advanced Member

17 people? It's easy to believe that this many (few) do actually meet the standard for revocation. I mean if even Trump's crew of rabid dogs couldn't find more.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
19 minutes ago, Jim Waldron said:

"...To succeed, federal authorities must convince a judge that a naturalized citizen obtained citizenship through fraud, misrepresentation or concealment of important information..."!

If so, then the denaturalization standard hasn’t changed. There’s no new statute, no new authority, no broadened legal test.

What has changed though, is this administration’s decision to treat denaturalization as a routine enforcement tool rather than a last‑resort measure.

You are correct !! the only change is the US is now using this as a routine !! Which will be the DOJ downfall ! the Department of Justice (DOJ) has issued directives to prioritize and maximize these proceedings in federal court, the process remains resource-intensive and legally restricted, the high legal thresholds and substantial litigation resources required mean that denaturalization cannot be applied routinely or en masse.

FlorC Platinum Member

FlorC

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, webfact said:

Those facing denaturalization proceedings can challenge the government's claims in court and seek to keep their citizenship.

So no problem if you get a lefty judge.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

Good idea.

The UK should do the same for the rape gangs and terrorist plotters.

Send them back.

howlee101 Gold Member

howlee101

Advanced Member

Ilhan Omar, US Rep from Minnesota, should be at the top of the list.

wmorris61 Explorer Member

wmorris61

Member

Is Melania on the list?? If not, why not?

koolkarl Gold Member

koolkarl

Advanced Member

Canada, Australia and many European countries should do same especially regarding terrorists or spreaders of false propaganda.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, koolkarl said:

Canada, Australia and many European countries should do same especially regarding terrorists or spreaders of false propaganda.

Most countries are signatories to international conventions, such as the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, which prohibits states from stripping an individual of their citizenship if it leaves them stateless. The U.S. denaturalization standard typically reverts a person back to their previous immigration status (such as a lawful permanent resident) rather than rendering them stateless, making the U.S. method unsuitable for countries where revocation would leave an individual without any nationality

jippytum Platinum Member

jippytum

Advanced Member

Not ungeasonable immigrants who commit serious crimes deserve to be stripped of citizenship and deported. Message to UK government regarding Pakistani grooming gangs

bwanajohn Senior Member

bwanajohn

Member

Yes and with finally having a DOJ lead by someone with integrity what could go wrong..If I was Melania I'd tread lightly.Remember what happened to her Brazilian mate.

daveAustin Diamond Member

daveAustin

Advanced Member

Are you going to send your missus home, Donald?

FinChin67 Silver Member

FinChin67

Advanced Member

This is what Europe needs badly!

Purdey Diamond Member

Purdey

Advanced Member

17 people is not what I would call a large expansion. Removing them isn't really solving the illegal immigration issue.

I was wondering whether, when one person in the family is no longer an American, does the government allow his innocent family to remain American or are they kicked out too? Imagine being an abused child and being told to leave with your father?

wwest5829 Platinum Member

wwest5829

Advanced Member

I await charges being brought against models brought to the USa under such schemes as the Visa arranged for by agencies, including those involved with Jeffry Epstein and his associates. Slovenia does come to mind … if I were to be charged I might well raise the question of selective prosecution.

SiSePuede419 Platinum Member

SiSePuede419

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, wwest5829 said:

I await charges being brought against models brought to the USa under such schemes as the Visa arranged for by agencies, including those involved with Jeffry Epstein and his associates. Slovenia does come to mind … if I were to be charged I might well raise the question of selective prosecution.

Different rules for some people

("The Epstein Elite Class")

You should know that by now.

To me it's shocking, it's like rich people don't know it's easy for them to get laid with the babysitter or au pair if they play their cards "right" weird huh

Epstein victim says she had dinner at Andrew's palace apartment

Aussie999 Platinum Member

Aussie999

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, koolkarl said:

Canada, Australia and many European countries should do same especially regarding terrorists or spreaders of false propaganda.

Australia does have similar laws, so far I've only seen it used on Kiwis.

Old Croc Star Member

Old Croc

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, koolkarl said:

Canada, Australia and many European countries should do same especially regarding terrorists or spreaders of false propaganda.

Australia has revocation legislation similar to the US as described in a post above.

I know of two cases where citizenship was stripped from someone. I'm sure there's been more.

A British woman stole a large quantity of gold before the grant, but her role in the theft was only uncovered after becoming a citizen. An American basketballer received citizenship on the basis of his sporting prowess but was later found to be a serial abuser of young girls.

Iron Tongue Gold Member

Iron Tongue

Advanced Member

Big freakin' deal.

The Biden Admin had revoked at least 14 IIRC, I couldn't find the actual number because US press obviously didn't want to include that number in their reporting.

As if this hasn't been done before. The US had revoked over 22,000 citizenships during the 20th Cent.

Front Row Advanced Member

Front Row

Member

This administration wants a white Christian nation. No room for any brown people. America, good luck getting your lawn mowed, your hotel room cleaned, your elders given home health care, your fruits and vegetables picked from the fields.

This is the least of the issues around immigration enforcement, assuming this is not weaponization against political foes.

S Mart Explorer Member

S Mart

Member
1 hour ago, wmorris61 said:

Is Melania on the list?? If not, why not?

Wake up. We’re talking about people lying on their immigration applications and also committing crimes.

If only you people who so despise Americans and the Trump Admin so much probably not even Americans yourselves could look at your selves in a logical manner it would probably be a huge wake up call. Some of your comments are very racist and extremely biased..

novacova Diamond Member

novacova

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Front Row said:

This administration wants a white Christian nation.

Really? And exactly where did you come across this information?

4 minutes ago, Front Row said:

No room for any brown people. America, good luck getting your lawn mowed, your hotel room cleaned, your elders given home health care, your fruits and vegetables picked from the fields.

This is the least of the issues around immigration enforcement, assuming this is not weaponization against political foes.

Quite the wild exaggeration there.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, novacova said:

Really? And exactly where did you come across this information?

Quite the wild exaggeration there.

The left has to lie incessantly, it's all they have.

The administration wants to prosecute people committing, so the left says the administration hates brown people. The left must think all brown people commit fraud.

The administration wants to deport criminals that are in the country illegally, so the left says the administration hates brown people. The left must think all brown people are criminals that are in the county illegally.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member

Hayelll yeah they should go

Love it or leave it man

Go Donald

Front Row Advanced Member

Front Row

Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

The left has to lie incessantly, it's all they have.

The administration wants to prosecute people committing, so the left says the administration hates brown people. The left must think all brown people commit fraud.

The administration wants to deport criminals that are in the country illegally, so the left says the administration hates brown people. The left must think all brown people are criminals that are in the county illegally.

They going to start with Mel?

Wingate Gold Member

Wingate

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, wmorris61 said:

Is Melania on the list?? If not, why not?

She came in, perhaps fraudulently, on an Einstein Visa (or was it an Epstein Visa?).

Maybe Trump is doing a trade-in for a younger model?

cjinchiangrai Platinum Member

cjinchiangrai

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, Caldera said:

17 people? It's easy to believe that this many (few) do actually meet the standard for revocation. I mean if even Trump's crew of rabid dogs couldn't find more.

That is all well and good, now prepare a case and bring it before a judge. Revoking citizenship is no simple matter.

Wingate Gold Member

Wingate

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

The left has to lie incessantly, it's all they have.

The administration wants to prosecute people committing, so the left says the administration hates brown people. The left must think all brown people commit fraud.

The administration wants to deport criminals that are in the country illegally, so the left says the administration hates brown people. The left must think all brown people are criminals that are in the county illegally.

Since you seem to be an expert on mendacity, perhaps you can explain some of Trump's comments.

Were these lying or dementia? There are no other options.

-His claim, in an interview in the UK, that he ended the 1994 Rwandan Genocide

-When he related the discussion he supposedly had with his genius MIT professor uncle, about the Unabomber. Trump claimed his uncle taught the Unabomber at MIT, and that they discussed him by name as to his intellect. In reality, the Unabomber went to Harvard, and when genius uncle passed, his real identity was still unknown

Oh, Trump's claim he graduated at the top of his class from UPenn was an obvious lie, not dementia related.

wavodavo Gold Member

wavodavo

Advanced Member

4 hours ago, koolkarl said:

Canada, Australia and many European countries should do same especially regarding terrorists or spreaders of false propaganda.

The current Australian Government is too gutlees and scared to do anything like this for the fear of losing migrant / muslim votes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.