Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

US Strikes Iran as Strait of Hormuz Tensions Rise

The United States carried out fresh air strikes on Iranian targets on Tuesday, in a move that could further inflame a six-month-old standoff that has disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and pushed up global oil prices.

The strikes came after an exchange of fire over the weekend—the first since July—and after two tankers were hit on Monday. The Strait of Hormuz is the key sea route for international crude supplies, and Iran has effectively restricted shipping there.

Brent crude futures, which were already higher earlier in the day, rose again following reports of the new strikes, according to market data.

US Central Command Says It Targets IRGC Sites

The US Central Command said its forces began striking Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets in Iran at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time (1600 GMT). It said the attacks followed what it described as attempted attacks by the IRGC on commercial shipping in the strait and on American service members in the region.

Iranian state media said explosions were reported on Qeshm Island, on the northern side of the strait. Nour News reported further blasts near ports including Bandar Abbas and Chabahar on the southern coast. IRNA and other state outlets also reported explosions near Jask and Sirik, and said US forces attacked a civilian airport in Jiroft in southern Iran.

A US embassy in Qatar urged Americans in the region to exercise “heightened vigilance”, adding that there could be flight cancellations, airspace closures and travel disruption.

Tehran Rejects Threats, Warns Oil Exports Will Stop

Tehran warned it would not allow oil exports from the Gulf. It has rejected US threats of further strikes, even as President Donald Trump said on social media that retaliation would be met with new attacks at a “harder and higher” level.

The US administration also signalled a potential new wave of economic pressure. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned last week that Washington would significantly escalate sanctions on countries that do business with Iran, although the United States has not set out details.

Iran has faced heavy sanctions for decades, and officials have not shown signs of backing away from their position despite repeated US threats.

Scale Of Latest Hostilities Unclear

The scope and duration of the latest phase of fighting remained unclear. Iranian state-linked outlets cited an IRGC-linked spokesperson warning that the US would “regret” the new attacks.

The conflict has shifted between armed exchanges and diplomatic and economic pressure. It began escalating on February 28 after US and Israeli strikes, and has since killed thousands in Iran and Lebanon, according to the memorandum framework described by both sides.

Before Tuesday’s strikes, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said at a regional summit in Kyrgyzstan that Tehran would respond immediately if Washington met its commitments under a June Memorandum of Understanding intended to halt the fighting. The MOU ended active hostilities but postponed difficult issues and opened a 60-day negotiation period, which ended without agreement. Since then, Iranian officials have not publicly indicated any willingness to concede.

Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf was quoted by Iranian media as saying that if others wanted Iran not to export oil from the Persian Gulf, “no one” would be able to do so. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told a press conference in Tehran that Washington was “addicted to making excessive demands” and had mistaken negotiations for imposing terms.

Analysts said the ongoing tit-for-tat missile exchanges have reinforced concerns that, even without a wider “forever war”, the conflict could continue for some time.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

2 September 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

fredwiggy Star Member

fredwiggy

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I will take Mary Trump's version of Trump over yours. She is a clinical psychologist, AFAIK you are not.

Quote:

  1. Antisocial Personality Disorder: Marked by a chronic disregard for rules, social norms, and the rights of others, along with a lack of remorse or empathy.

  2. Dependent Personality Disorder: Reflected in an underlying inability to function independently without constant validation and sycophantic reinforcement.

  3. Undiagnosed Learning/Sleep Disorders: Impairments that hinder his ability to process complex information, learn new facts, or maintain cognitive focus.

No argument from me Iran's leaders are sociopaths or even psychopaths. My point is they were only a threat to Israel, now they are a threat to everybody, and that is down to Trump. When Mary Trump says Trump's ability to process complex information is hindered, the Strait of Hormuz is a good example. A fifth-grader could have seen Iran would be asserting control.

The real problem is negotiations are going to be futile while Trump is in the White House. If someone killed my family and friends without warning, then wanted to make nice, I would be telling them to screw themselves too.

Yes, I studied much the same things as she has. Trump, like many others, is an easy read, especially when he speaks. I haven't talked to Melania, so I'm not sure abut his sleeping situation.

The rest is quite true, seeing his billions are a product of his dads beginning donations and his friend's help in business matters.

Iran has all along been a threat to everyone, seeing how they helped others spread their own terrorism.

Trump isn't the only one making decisions. He has a lot of backing that goes along with things and feeds him much of his information. His ego is what takes it over for his manner of thinking and decision making.

Negotiations are always futile when you're dealing with terrorists, as their thinking is one sided and evil. They have to be threatened with violence.

Past history has shown them what America does to other terrorists, and only them wanting to stay alive will get them to negotiate. They don't care about anyone else.

Lacessit Star Member

Lacessit

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

Yes, I studied much the same things as she has. Trump, like many others, is an easy read, especially when he speaks. I haven't talked to Melania, so I'm not sure abut his sleeping situation.

The rest is quite true, seeing his billions are a product of his dads beginning donations and his friend's help in business matters.

Iran has all along been a threat to everyone, seeing how they helped others spread their own terrorism.

Trump isn't the only one making decisions. He has a lot of backing that goes along with things and feeds him much of his information. His ego is what takes it over for his manner of thinking and decision making.

Negotiations are always futile when you're dealing with terrorists, as their thinking is one sided and evil. They have to be threatened with violence.

Past history has shown them what America does to other terrorists, and only them wanting to stay alive will get them to negotiate. They don't care about anyone else.

Past history has shown the Iranians the US can't finish what it starts. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran has a choke point, none of the others did.

You should check out what the British did in Malaysia, and the Australians did in East Timor. Neither started the conflict, but they certainly finished it.

wavodavo Gold Member

wavodavo

Advanced Member
19 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Severe ammunition shortages according to reports from the Pentagon. Particularly high-end interceptors and long range missiles are critically low. Trump and Hegseth nevertheless lied that ammunition not a problem.

Think about it for a moment .If you were fighting a war would you admit to your enemy that you were nearly out of ammo ?? Maybe Sleepy Joe would have but only if his autopen wrote him a letter to tell him.

fredwiggy Star Member

fredwiggy

Advanced Member
(edited)
7 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Past history has shown the Iranians the US can't finish what it starts. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran has a choke point, none of the others did.

You should check out what the British did in Malaysia, and the Australians did in East Timor. Neither started the conflict, but they certainly finished it.

They can finish but there are reasons they didn't. This isn't the past, and Trump isn't Bush, Obama, Biden or any others. That ego has him wanting to win, even though the costs might be high. All past wars have little to do with a new person in charge, new technology and Americans and other countries being tired of being victims of terrorism.

This isn't East Timor but a thousand times larger, involving not just a couple of countries but most everyone. Australia was originally for the conflict there, backing Indonesia in it's tyranny over the Timonese, but changed it's thinking, and with help from others, ended what was going on. The world's citizens were against them so they had to do something. The same thing's happening here, with America wanting to have relations with Iran, but them resisting change.That conflict was 24 years. This will end soon .

Edited by fredwiggy

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
23 hours ago, Lacessit said:

With what? American munitions are reportedly so depleted if China decides to invade Taiwan, the American military may not be able to prevent it.

And Putin can walk in EU.

Iran will strike in self defence, they fight for their freedom, not for their Ego.

That's the difference

Lacessit Star Member

Lacessit

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

They can finish but there are reasons they didn't. This isn't the past, and Trump isn't Bush, Obama, Biden or any others. That ego has him wanting to win, even though the costs might be high. All past wars have little to do with a new person in charge, new technology and Americans and other countries being tired of being victims of terrorism.

This isn't East Timor but a thousand times larger, involving not just a couple of countries but most everyone. Australia was originally for the conflict there, backing Indonesia in it's tyranny over the Timonese, but changed it's thinking, and with help from others, ended what was going on. The world's citizens were against them so they had to do something. The same thing's happening here, with America wanting to have relations with Iran, but them resisting change.That conflict was 24 years. This will end soon .

IIRC that was what Trump and Hegseth were saying six months ago.

fredwiggy Star Member

fredwiggy

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

IIRC that was what Trump and Hegseth were saying six months ago.

When you have resistance to common sense, what can you do?

SiSePuede419 Ruby Member

SiSePuede419

Advanced Member

Bulldoze the White House!

Stop mail in ballots!

Iran?

No beef!

Only chicken 🐔

King of The Catering Truck

Screenshot_20260820_082818_Google~2.jpg

Lacessit Star Member

Lacessit

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

When you have resistance to common sense, what can you do?

Who needs the common sense more, Iran or America?

fredwiggy Star Member

fredwiggy

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Who needs the common sense more, Iran or America?

Iran to know when to surrender, for everyone's benefit. America, to vote in someone with the strength of Trump, and less ego that helps everyone where they need it, and not to make himself look better in certain people's eyes.

Lacessit Star Member

Lacessit

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

Iran to know when to surrender, for everyone's benefit. America, to vote in someone with the strength of Trump, and less ego that helps everyone where they need it, and not to make himself look better in certain people's eyes.

Too late for Bernie Sanders

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
On 9/2/2026 at 8:16 AM, HolmesEquivelant said:

Time finish off the IRGC . They’ll never negotiate anything.

Never have , never will.

1 word and 4 letters, guess??? did you get it right, I will help you = TACO

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
On 9/2/2026 at 10:11 AM, HolmesEquivelant said:

the greatest military in the world. The U.S. military!!

that has been kicked in the rear by an army that has been "obliterated" 5 or 6 times and yet keeps kicking the US where it hurts

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
On 9/2/2026 at 10:29 AM, Cameroni said:

It is clear that economic sanctions will not win this war. If that were a good strategy it would have been used at the outset. Everyone knows sanctions take a long time to take effect. This use of sanctions is desperation, clearly.

This war against Iran has been a terrible mistake by Trump. Sure, he was cajoled into it by Israel, but he should have seen through this. Perhaps the US military will destroy Iran's civilian and military infrastructure. That is not going to stop them from rebuilding.

OMG ... I have to agree with you😅

FolkGuitar Platinum Member

FolkGuitar

Advanced Member

Only a fool starts a fight without a well-thought out strategy to win. Only a bully starts something, hoping the other side will back down. Donald… they ain’t backing down, are they? And you have no idea how to win. Your boy fired all the top generals and admirals, so nobody left to steer the boat, and you clearly have no idea how to do it. Now you are making moves to stop free elections.

America is so screwed.

spidermike007 Star Member

spidermike007

Advanced Member
21 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

Yes, it shouldn't happen. Americans would die, and most of Iran's infantry also. This isn't the past though, the US having much more technology in weapons, intel and bombs that can kill thousands at one time without using nuclear. Again, if Iran cared about it's people and their futures, this would have already ended. It's going on too long and needs negotiation for everyone's benefit. Too costly. I also don't see Trump backing down with that ego.

Maybe. Maybe not. That ginormous ego of his as a history of getting him into trouble. With the midterms approaching he's looking at a potential slaughter and becoming doubly impotent come November. At that point his only option might be suicide resignation or?

Lacessit Star Member

Lacessit

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

Iran to know when to surrender, for everyone's benefit. America, to vote in someone with the strength of Trump, and less ego that helps everyone where they need it, and not to make himself look better in certain people's eyes.

America and Israel were not existential threats to Iran. Now they are. As Ukraine has shown, when a people is faced with an existential threat, surrender is not an option.

It's the same for the Iranian IRGC, even though they do not represent Iranians.

worgeordie Star Member

worgeordie

Advanced Member
On 9/2/2026 at 8:16 AM, HolmesEquivelant said:

Time finish off the IRGC . They’ll never negotiate anything.

Never have , never will.

To do that would mean boots on the ground and Donald is never going to do that,

at least until after the midterms ,no war has ever been won without putting soldiers

on the ground...

regards worgeordie

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

To do that would mean boots on the ground and Donald is never going to do that,

at least until after the midterms ,no war has ever been won without putting soldiers

on the ground...

regards worgeordie

You tend not to win them by bombing school children and weddings either. But the US is pretty good at it - I don't remember any recent war where they didn't hit at least a couple of wedding parties.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cm86xq9261xdt

temuFarang Advanced Member

temuFarang

Member
26 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

You tend not to win them by bombing school children and weddings either. But the US is pretty good at it - I don't remember any recent war where they didn't hit at least a couple of wedding parties.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cm86xq9261xdt

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, temuFarang said:

Is there a point to posting that?

earlinclaifornia Platinum Member

earlinclaifornia

Advanced Member
On 9/2/2026 at 10:29 AM, Cameroni said:

It is clear that economic sanctions will not win this war. If that were a good strategy it would have been used at the outset. Everyone knows sanctions take a long time to take effect. This use of sanctions is desperation, clearly.

This war against Iran has been a terrible mistake by Trump. Sure, he was cajoled into it by Israel, but he should have seen through this. Perhaps the US military will destroy Iran's civilian and military infrastructure. That is not going to stop them from rebuilding.

I take exception, even maga have wild effects when a reality pill takes effect

HolmesEquivelant Silver Member

HolmesEquivelant

Advanced Member
On 9/3/2026 at 3:50 AM, josephbloggs said:

You tend not to win them by bombing school children and weddings either. But the US is pretty good at it - I don't remember any recent war where they didn't hit at least a couple of wedding parties.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cm86xq9261xdt

Under investigation. The school happened to be located on an IRGC base btw.

U.S. doesn’t target civilians. I’ll believe Admiral Cooper over you. My prerogative.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, HolmesEquivelant said:

Under investigation. The school happened to be located on an IRGC base btw.

Lie. It hadn't been on a base since 2016 when it became a school, was separated, wall off and painted in pastel colours and murals.

U.S. doesn’t target civilians. I’ll believe Admiral Cooper over you. My prerogative.


Never?

Firebombing of Japan. Firebombing of Hamburg and Dresden. Targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure in Vietnam and Korea - bombing damns to destroy the civilian rice supply. Oh, yeah, and a couple of nuclear bombs on cities.

Since then maybe you didn't deliberately target them but your total incompetence has led to countless shelling of civilian buildings and you've killed millions of civilians. And your beloved president has publicly threatened to destroy civilian infrastructure which is a war crime.

You believe what you like. I'll believe that the US is one of the biggest killers of civilians in the world. Facts support that.

HolmesEquivelant Silver Member

HolmesEquivelant

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Lie. It hadn't been on a base since 2016 when it became a school, was separated, wall off and painted in pastel colours and murals.


Never?

Firebombing of Japan. Firebombing of Hamburg and Dresden. Targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure in Vietnam and Korea - bombing damns to destroy the civilian rice supply. Oh, yeah, and a couple of nuclear bombs on cities.

Since then maybe you didn't deliberately target them but your total incompetence has led to countless shelling of civilian buildings and you've killed millions of civilians. And your beloved president has publicly threatened to destroy civilian infrastructure which is a war crime.

You believe what you like. I'll believe that the US is one of the biggest killers of civilians in the world. Facts support that.

How many civilians has your country killed in its glorious colonial history?

Fact Gold Member

Fact

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, HolmesEquivelant said:

How many civilians has your country killed in its glorious colonial history?

Lets ask AI. Here is an nice table.

Approximate civilian deaths associated with British colonial rule

Region/event

Approx. deaths

What we’re counting

India — famines & mortality crises

Tens of millions

Famine/excess mortality associated with colonial economic and food policies

India — 1881–1920 mortality crisis

~50 million

Sullivan & Hickel’s conservative excess-mortality estimate

India — same period, alternative baseline

Up to 165 million

Much more controversial counterfactual estimate

Bengal famine, 1943

~2–3 million

Famine deaths under British wartime administration

Irish Great Famine, 1845–52

~1 million

Deaths from starvation/disease; British policy is heavily debated as a causal factor

Boer War concentration camps

~43,000

~28,000 Boers + ≥15,000 Africans

Kenya/Mau Mau Emergency

~20,000–30,000

Estimate of deaths caused by British colonial authorities

Australia — frontier massacres

10,000+ documented/estimated

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people killed in identified massacres

Other British colonial wars/repression

Many thousands–millions

Highly variable estimates; difficult to aggregate

The India number dominates the calculation. Sullivan and Hickel’s peer-reviewed World Development paper estimates approximately 50 million excess deaths between 1891 and 1920 using India’s own 1880s mortality as the baseline. Using early-modern English mortality as the counterfactual produces 165 million, but that is a much more aggressive assumption and shouldn’t be presented as an established death toll.  

And there is an important distinction: 50 million excess deaths ≠ 50 million people directly killed by British soldiers. It is an estimate of mortality above a counterfactual level, with the authors attributing the crisis substantially to the political economy of British colonialism. Other historians dispute the magnitude and/or the causal attribution.

The Boer War is a good example of why the distinction matters

Britain established concentration camps for Boer and African civilians during the Second Boer War. Approximately 28,000 Boers died in the camps, about 79% of them children, while at least 15,000 Africans died in separate camps. Historians generally attribute the deaths primarily to overcrowding, inadequate food and sanitation, and epidemic disease rather than a British policy explicitly intended to exterminate the population.  

So calling all ~43,000 “people Britain deliberately killed” would be inaccurate. Calling them civilian deaths resulting from British military internment policy is much more defensible.

Australia

The Australian case illustrates another problem with trying to produce one grand total. The University of Newcastle’s massacre project has identified more than 10,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander deaths in more than 400 massacres. Other researchers have produced substantially higher estimates for frontier violence, but those estimates are contested.  

Kenya

During the Mau Mau Emergency, British authorities used mass detention and coercive counterinsurgency. A recent scholarly review reports estimates of 20,000–30,000 deaths caused by the British colonial administration, while noting that the exact figure is uncertain. British authorities also executed 1,090 Kikuyu men for Mau Mau-related offenses.  

Fact Gold Member

Fact

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

You believe what you like. I'll believe that the US is one of the biggest killers of civilians in the world. Facts support that.

Leta ask AI.

State/regime

Approx. civilian deaths attributable to regime/policies

Major causes

Mao’s China

~30–45 million+

Great Leap Forward famine, political violence, executions

Nazi Germany

~11–17 million civilians deliberately murdered

Holocaust, starvation policies, massacres, occupation

Stalin’s USSR

~10–20 million+

Famines, executions, Gulag, deportations, collectivization

British Empire

Tens of millions under broader excess-mortality estimates

Indian famines, colonial repression, wars, forced policies

Imperial Japan

~3–10+ million

Massacres, occupation, forced labor, starvation

Belgian Congo

Millions

Forced labor, killings, disease and demographic collapse

Ottoman Empire

Millions

Armenian genocide and other wartime/ethnic violence

Khmer Rouge Cambodia

~1.5–2 million

Execution, starvation, forced labor

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.