Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

War with Iran strains US-UK relationship as Starmer and Trump clash

The war with Iran has exposed sharp tensions between Keir Starmer and Donald Trump, straining a trans-Atlantic relationship the British leader had worked carefully to cultivate.

Trump publicly criticised Starmer this week over Britain’s reluctance to join U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran. Speaking at the White House, Trump said: “This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with,” accusing the UK of hesitating to allow American warplanes to use British bases.

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe-orange.png

In an interview with The Sun, Trump said the relationship with Britain was no longer as strong as before, adding: “It’s very sad to see that the relationship is obviously not what it was.”

Dispute over base access

Starmer initially blocked U.S. aircraft from operating out of British bases during the first wave of strikes. He later agreed to limited use of bases in England and on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean for what the UK described as defensive actions targeting Iranian missile sites — but not broader offensive operations.

Even after an Iran-made drone struck the British air base at Akrotiri in Cyprus, Starmer maintained that the UK “will not join offensive action.” He announced that the Royal Navy destroyer HMS Dragon and Wildcat helicopters equipped with counter-drone capabilities were being deployed for defensive purposes. British forces have also intercepted drones in Jordanian and Iraqi airspace.

In the House of Commons, Starmer offered a rare implicit rebuke of the U.S. approach, saying the UK does not believe in “regime change from the skies.”

“Any UK actions must always have a lawful basis and a viable, thought-through plan,” he told lawmakers, adding that while Trump disagreed with Britain’s position, it was his duty to act in the national interest.

Growing friction

The disagreement comes against a backdrop of mounting friction between the two leaders. Trump’s earlier comments about taking control of Greenland were criticised by European governments, including London. More recently, Trump has attacked Britain’s agreement to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands — home to the strategically important Diego Garcia base — to Mauritius.

Peter Ricketts, a former head of the UK Foreign Office, said the U.S. under Trump had “effectively given up on any effort to be consistent with international law,” a stance likely to trouble Starmer, a former chief prosecutor.

Despite the tensions, UK officials insist the “special relationship” remains intact. Foreign Office Minister Stephen Doughty told Parliament that ties with Washington “have endured, continue to endure, and will endure into the future.”

However, the Iran conflict has highlighted differing approaches to military intervention and international law, raising questions about how closely London and Washington will align as the war continues.


Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png




image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 03.03 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member

Laws only apply to others, not to Trump apparently

khaosokman Gold Member

khaosokman

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

Nonsense.

Starmer took the moral high ground.

So Starmer would not kill 40 Ted Bundys then. That would make Starmer a very weak man.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member

GREAT Britain deserves better than Starmer

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
51 minutes ago, khaosokman said:

So Starmer would not kill 40 Ted Bundys then. That would make Starmer a very weak man.

And 2+2=5

Next!

khaosokman Gold Member

khaosokman

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

And 2+2=5

Next!

What a very strange response but you support terrorists so it makes sense.

khaosokman Gold Member

khaosokman

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

GREAT Britain deserves better than Starmer

Not really. Look at Prince Andrew and Charles. They deserve Starmer.

scorecard Star Member

scorecard

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Crikey, you have a lot of questions.

10 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Typical antagonizing member, has a warrior keyboard to attack but too lazy to google

"SAFETY FIRSTAdvanced Member

10 hours ago

10 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Then I suggest that you stop making pointless/needless posts that need answers so that the needless/pointless post(s) can be understood and put into the context of the discussion!!

Typical antagonizing member, has a warrior keyboard to attack but too lazy to google"

Re the underlined text, seems to me that anybody who posts comments / opinions or whatever should include enough detail so that any reader understands the point of the post. And not expect that the reader go to google to try to find the point.

khaosokman Gold Member

khaosokman

Advanced Member
10 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

A typical antagonizing keyboard warrior who does not appreciate that posts should not need to be clarified by the unnecessary use of google.

Google should NOT be needed for clarification on a forum but clarity of posting by a member is!

You don't have 1 minute to use google but a decade to post on a forum. That does not make sense. No poster has to explain anything. You are an elderly man. If you don't know something go read up on it.

scorecard Star Member

scorecard

Advanced Member
26 minutes ago, khaosokman said:

Not really. Look at Prince Andrew and Charles. They deserve Starmer.

Seems t m that Starmer is not that bad, his policies (some socialist) are pretty good, however the oppositin seem determined to find / create any reason to build some negative against him and force an election.

khaosokman Gold Member

khaosokman

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, scorecard said:

Seems t m that Starmer is not that bad, his policies (some socialist) are pretty good, however the oppositin seem determined to find / create any reason to build some negative against him and force an election.

The latest official figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed unemployment rose to 5.2% in the final quarter of 2025, the highest rate since the start of 2021. Young people have been bearing the brunt of this rise, with 16% of those aged 16-24 now unemployed, nearly an 11-year-high.

Autocan Advanced Member

Autocan

Member
15 hours ago, ASEAN NOW News said:

In the House of Commons, Starmer offered a rare implicit rebuke of the U.S. approach, saying the UK does not believe in “regime change from the skies.”

Spain's Sanchez, now UK's Starmer. The vassals are vacillating. Who'd have thunk? To be fair to Spain though I never saw Sanchez at one of the EU leaders dutiful schoolboys lineup in the Oval O.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member

I’m in the UK right now.

Starmer refusing to join the the Israeli/ US illegal war on Iran is being discussed in very positive terms.

While here on this forum, those who have consistently criticized Blair for joining Bush’s illegal war on Iraq have gone very quiet. Perhaps they just can’t bring themselves to admit Starmer is doing the right thing by keeping the UK out of this illegal Israeli/US war.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman

Sir Keir Starmer has cast doubt on Donald Trump’s strategy in Iran, refusing to commit Britain to offensive action without what he called a “viable, thought-through plan”.

The Prime Minister’s remarks amount to a public rebuke of the US president as pressure mounts on London to deepen its role in the escalating conflict.

‘Not Joining a War Blind’

At Prime Minister’s Questions, Sir Keir said he would not authorise RAF strikes unless satisfied there was a lawful basis and a clear endgame.

“What I was not prepared to do on Saturday was for the UK to join a war unless I was satisfied there was a lawful basis and a viable, thought-through plan,” he told MPs. “That remains my position.”

Mr Trump had criticised Britain’s initial refusal to allow US forces to use bases including Diego Garcia for strikes on Tehran.

Special Relationship Under Strain

The US president later branded Sir Keir “no Winston Churchill” and accused him of ruining relationships. The Prime Minister hit back, insisting British jets were already intercepting Iranian drones and missiles to protect American personnel.

“Hanging on to President Trump’s latest words is not the special relationship in action,” he said.

Bases Under Fire

RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus was targeted by an Iranian drone on Sunday, intensifying calls from the Conservatives for direct retaliation. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused the Government of “catching arrows rather than stopping the archer”.

Sir Keir confirmed F-35s and Typhoons were operating across the region and that HMS Dragon would be deployed with Wildcat helicopters to bolster defences.

High Stakes, Narrow Margin

Britain has since permitted limited US use of its bases for defensive purposes. But the line is clear: no offensive British action without a coherent strategy.

With troops deployed and missiles flying, the political and military balance is tightening — and the pressure on Downing Street is only growing.

Starmer: Trump has no viable plan for Iran

scorecard Star Member

scorecard

Advanced Member
22 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

I've got a friend who asks me lots of questions, he's always trying to make conversation.

I haven't got time to answer needless questions.

So why do you spend time on this site?

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
9 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m in the UK right now.

Starmer refusing to join the the Israeli/ US illegal war on Iran is being discussed in very positive terms.

While here on this forum, those who have consistently criticized Blair for joining Bush’s illegal war on Iraq have gone very quiet. Perhaps they just can’t bring themselves to admit Starmer is doing the right thing by keeping the UK out of this illegal Israeli/US war.

My Brit friends saying he is bowing to the Muslims for votes again.

He’s terrified the greens are gonna steal that sectarian bloc

That’s why he so quick to tell everyone it wasn’t him like a kid running to teacher when a fight breaks out in the playground what a simp no balls.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
9 hours ago, Chivas said:

The more people try to abuse Sir Keir the more popular he has become this last week

Highly amusing that the orange fat boy has thrown his toys out of his pram

Even the polls are rapidly changing

Screenshot 2026-03-03 at 08-09-22 Home _ X.png

Nah reform still leading and greens second that poll must be from some twitter talking shop

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m in the UK right now.

Starmer refusing to join the the Israeli/ US illegal war on Iran is being discussed in very positive terms.

While here on this forum, those who have consistently criticized Blair for joining Bush’s illegal war on Iraq have gone very quiet. Perhaps they just can’t bring themselves to admit Starmer is doing the right thing by keeping the UK out of this illegal Israeli/US war.

I suspect @JonnyF is on vacation!

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member

The Blair effect... 😀

Labour doesn't want to be stuck again in a Republican war in the ME.

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
57 minutes ago, candide said:

The Blair effect... 😀

Labour doesn't want to be stuck again in a Republican war in the ME.

And rightly so.

Stocky Ruby Member

Stocky

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

I suspect @JonnyF is on vacation!

I thought he'd morphed into EastBayRay

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, EastBayRay said:

My Brit friends saying he is bowing to the Muslims for votes again.

He’s terrified the greens are gonna steal that sectarian bloc

That’s why he so quick to tell everyone it wasn’t him like a kid running to teacher when a fight breaks out in the playground what a simp no balls.

Perhaps your ‘Brit friends’ don’t have military aged children.

I have not heard anyone here in the UK say they think the UK should join this illegal Israeli/American war.

And there’s deadly silence from those who have made a habit of ranting about Blair engaging in illegal war.

blaze master Diamond Member

blaze master

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, candide said:

The Blair effect... 😀

Labour doesn't want to be stuck again in a Republican war in the ME.

Absolutely. They have much bigger issues to worry about like their tanking approval.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
19 minutes ago, blaze master said:

Absolutely. They have much bigger issues to worry about like their tanking approval.

Odd thing to say given the clear approval of Starmer keeping the UK out of this illegal Israeli/US war on Iran.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
On 3/4/2026 at 2:26 PM, Yagoda said:

GREAT Britain deserves better than Starmer

The 'great' is a geographical reference. Nothing to do with power.

I'll refrain from any further comment against such an easy target.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
On 3/4/2026 at 7:29 AM, Stocky said:

And shiny gold bling, the tackier the better.

Like I've always said, one of the worst things on the planet is a prole with money.

wombat Platinum Member

wombat

Advanced Member
On 3/4/2026 at 11:58 AM, Lacessit said:

Pauline Hanson, queen of the bigots?

Absolutely 100% behind Pauline Hanson this time...... she may be queen of the bigots but she's my bigot

islam 555.jpg

islam .jpg

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
14 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I have not heard anyone here in the UK say they think the UK should join this illegal Israeli/American war.

That’s the trouble with you lefties you hang around in your echo chambers and got no idea what real people think my Brit buddies hate starmer and think he’s a coward

This is totally different to Blair’s illegal wmd war and you know it starmer is too scared of the Muslims back home currently taking over the uk simple as that Otherwise he’d be playing tough guy again like he did with Ukraine

Weren’t you the guy saying Britain does what America tells it to do? We say jump and you guys say how high? What happened to all tha then Bud? Talking bullcarp again?

Lacessit Star Member

Lacessit

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, wombat said:

Absolutely 100% behind Pauline Hanson this time...... she may be queen of the bigots but she's my bigot

islam 555.jpg

islam .jpg

We were drowning in Asians before she decided Muslims were a better vote-catcher.

wombat Platinum Member

wombat

Advanced Member
23 hours ago, Lacessit said:

We were drowning in Asians before she decided Muslims were a better vote-catcher.

It's good she recognised and addressed the problem then.... Kudos Pauline

pauline 1.jpg

Lacessit Star Member

Lacessit

Advanced Member
53 minutes ago, wombat said:

It's good she recognised and addressed the problem then.... Kudos Pauline

pauline 1.jpg

Yeah, a flag with the Union Jack on it. Hanson is a monarchist, which is about as relevant to Australia as an ash-tray on a motorbike.

Like Trump, she gets her votes from the ignorant. Her net wealth, garnered from appealing to bigotry and racism, is between $3 and $6 million.

Some of that comes from investment properties, while she publicly rails against how expensive housing is. <deleted> hypocrite.

There are many Australians who are yet to grow up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.