impulse

You probably shouldn't unless you double up on your blood pressure meds. I, OTOH, follow Fox, CNN, Daily Caller, Politico, Western Journal, USA Today, Al Jazeera, RT and a few others. Because none of them are fair and balanced. But I look for the data, not the analysis. I still can't stomach MSNBC, and I only go to CNN if a link sends me there... Edit: BTW, "Laptop is Russian disinformation" should disqualify most of your sources as liars if you were being fair.

Once again, you can question and absolutely disagree with their analysis. But they're not going to get the chronology wrong. It's too easy to fact check. And the chronology stinks.

Based on the speed with which you replied, there's no way you could have watched the link. So you have absolutely no useful input. But don't let that stop you. Trump haters never do. Edit: Here's how I will respond, though. You can question and absolutely disagree with their analysis. But they're not going to get the chronology wrong. It's too easy to fact check. And the chronology stinks.

Interesting update now that the entire Grand Jury report is available. Takeaway is that the results of the Grand Jury were accidentally posted before they even finished. The 19 defendants were mentioned the morning of, before the proceeding was completed that evening. Now, the rest of the report says the Grand Jury recommended indicting 39 people. How, exactly, did they know which of the 39 were actually going to be indicted that morning if the fix wasn't in? Trump may be guilty as sin, and that will come out in the trial. But something stinks about the process. Even if you completely disagree with these guys' analysis of the facts, the facts they lay out are disturbing. https://www.foxnews.com/video/6336940745112

Not according to left wing commentator Ana Kasparian (The Young Turks): “California is *without question* a **** show under Newsom. But I guess propping up proven failures is what the Democratic party excels at these days,” Kasparian tweeted Friday. If they even lose Ana, from TYT, they've lost the plot. I've always enjoyed listening to her, though I've often vehemently disagreed. This one, she got right. My forecast, in order of likelihood: Michelle, Kamala, Newsom, Biden, the rest of the fricking world, AOC, JFK Jr.

If you're asking whether the FBI withheld evidence during the Trump administration, that's a documented fact. They had the laptop for a looong time. Knew it was authentic, for a loooong time. Yes, that's indicative of suppressing the evidence. They suppressed for so long, in fact, that the statute of limitations has run out on several charges. It wasn't until after the Repubs won the house that the dominoes started falling.

I was referring to the first part of your post that said there is none, so nothing to release. That is provably false. I don't even understand your reference to Trump and Barr in this topic of a Biden impeachment fight.

Catch me up... Are there any updates on the tech where hydrogen is stored in the interstitial spaces of some porous material? I seem to recall it had some promise.

McCarthy has asked for very specific documents, e-mails and bank records. Biden's attorneys are declining to provide them. “If you look at all the information we have been able to gather so far, it is a natural step forward that you would have to go to an impeachment inquiry,” McCarthy told Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures.”....An impeachment inquiry, he said, “provides Congress the apex of legal power to get all the information they need.” The "information we have been able to gather so" far includes over 100 bank suspicious activities reports, 1023 forms, testimony from IRS and FBI whistleblowers, e-mails from the laptop, and a myriad of others. You can reasonably claim the evidence isn't conclusive. (That's why they want subpoena power). But to claim that there is none, is patently false. But that's the narrative being put out by the Dems and the MSM. With the exception of the usual suspects, that I refer to as the right wing coconut telegraph. Oops. Forgot my link: https://apnews.com/article/mccarthy-hunter-biden-impeachment-inquiry-government-shutdown-56d9ccc7f090ea220a47e877e503179e

Can't say I blame them. A couple of years ago, I saw a group picnicking and playing Frisbee in the WW2 Cemetery in Kanchanburi. The Thai caretaker was having none of it... Kudos to him. I suspect they feel the same way about temple crematoriums. BTW, the Frisbee players in the K-Buri Cemetery were Asian, but I was too far away to tell what nationality. I was on my way closer when the Thai caretaker ran them off.

They're all the same inside. Pink and wrinkled. (Sorry, I'm trolling some lefties on some other threads and that's put me in a strange mood)

If your kid came home and said "Dad, I'm not doing dope, but don't look in my top left drawer" would you have evidence before you looked in the top left drawer? The Repubs want to look in the top left drawer... Biden's team of dozens of lawyers, aren't letting them.

He may be a troll, but he's our troll. I don't subscribe to the conclusions or analysis of either of these links. But that's where you need to go to see RFK Jr's claims. The MSM is silent on the issue... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rfk-jr-campaign-accuses-dnc-being-undemocratic-demands-assurances-every-dems-vote-counts https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-08-rfkjr-democrats-rigged-nomination-biden-excluding-everyone.html The gist: "Two of the things today is they've moved the Iowa primary, they've made rules that if anybody campaigns in Iowa or sets foot, any candidate sets foot in the state of Iowa or steps foot in the state of New Hampshire, then none of the votes that are cast for that candidate will be tallied," RFK Jr. said. "In other words, any delegate that I win in Iowa or New Hampshire would go instead to the president. And now they're trying to change it that if I campaign in New Hampshire that none of the votes cast for me in Georgia will count, and that's significant because it's hard to win the nomination without Georgia."

Karma: https://www.npr.org/2023/09/10/1187224861/electric-vehicles-evs-cars-chargers-charging-energy-secretary-jennifer-granholm Yeah, I know it's just teething pains, but it's still funny...

If there's no evidence, why not release the evidence?

That may be true, but shouldn't the voters be the ones to decide whether he's bat cr@p crazy? Not some Star Chamber at the DNC, like they did to Bernie...

Wow. Tag team lefties. I don't favor an impeachment (yet), but I absolutely favor an impeachment inquiry, granting congress subpoena powers to get at the documents, emails, bank records and other evidence they seek (and the Biden team is holding back on). If there's nothing to hide, why not just release the evidence? And fire the dozens of attorneys they've hired to squelch the evidence...

Really? What could be easier? Have you observed how renewable energy has taken over that market for example? That's basically the result of government intervention funding the research and startups and putting priority on development of alternative non-fossil fuel energy. Have you observed the carbon markets? For the first time they're now becoming economically viable in terms of the market price providing sufficient incentive and funding. That's again the result of government intervention then the markets realizing that this is a worthwhile investment and taking it on. Have you observed the $30+ trillion in US gub'ment debt? Any idiot can throw money at a problem. Carbon market? What, exactly is the commercial value of carbon, other than a scheme to transfer wealth?

Looks like they're trying the ole rinse and repeat. What's the Current Coup Count?

You were doing okay until you mentioned AOC. Not great, but OK. Then, you lost it... Bernie, I like. Though I disagree with him a lot. If you don't like what they're doing to those 2, look at what RFK Jr is saying about his primary struggles. Scary.

Probably not a good time to ask you to post back with whatever info you find, though it may be helpful to some others on here. Assuming you're on Step Zero of the process, I'd suggest you go to the Thai Post with a few typical items that your son expects to sell, and see about the process and the cost by sending them to a family member back home. Also, see what's required to get their best pricing if he's going to be shipping a lot of parcels. He may need to be a registered business. (Or maybe not) The cost may be prohibitive, or it may not. I wouldn't worry about getting the taxes 100% right at the start. Sure, reserve some money so you can pay income taxes when required, but don't let that sidetrack you. And if you can, please post back when you do get it figured out.

I still wonder what happened to that Italian (I think) guy who was banged up for no work permit because he was building boats in his yard.

Here's the exemption that confuses me: Persons who enter into the Kingdom for the performance of any duty or mission for the benefit of education, culture, arts, or sports;

1) We always had more permits and exploration prospects than we had the budget to drill and explore. We ranked them according to the Corporate criteria de jour and spent money on the best ones first. If the gub'ment came in and banned drilling or exploring on the best prospects, that left us with the dregs (for lack of a better word). It's a little simple to claim the permits didn't get drilled because of price uncertainty. Most didn't get drilled because there were better places to invest the finite Corporate budget. 2) I'm claiming that we may should have not fomented a coup that caused Ukraine to lose Crimea (under a Dem administration), Russia made no moves under the previous (R) administration, and now that the Dems are back in, Russia misbehaves again. Hmmm.... 3) There is no global price of oil. There are many prices for oil at specific delivery points. A pipeline reduces the cost of getting that oil to the delivery points, reducing the cost to get it to the end user. That means lower pump prices. Unless you stop the pipeline...

Can you imagine the immense collective butt puckering sound at the DNC when he actually went and bragged about it? Of course, that was just one dot. And the evidence required to connect it with all the other dots was still years, e-mails, a laptop, whistleblowers, 1023's, and subpoenas away. But they had to be wondering what kind of an idiot... 'Cept Obama. He got it right. Never underestimate Joes ability to screw things up.