impulse

For every Swiftie, there's half a dozen guys with sour grape syndrome since they can't have her, and a few women who hate her because they found a photo of Swift in their boyfriend's sock drawer, next to the KY. Trump may win this one...

Once again, you link to a completely outdated list of cases. None after 2020 on the link. There have been dozens since then, and there will be more, for years. Here's one that went against your narrative, just last week. They don't refer to it as "fraud",. But against the rules that were passed by the legislature, but violated by the election board. As called out in the TX vs PA lawsuit. Dismissed in 2020 because Texas didn't have standing. Not because they were wrong. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-ballots-incorrect-dates-rcna170819 On an aside, I wonder why your link (and their embedded link) quit compiling data after 2020? Maybe because the narrative didn't go the way they preferred?

Let her drive. You're welcome. Edit: Assuming the bargirl is old enough to drive... I understand that may not be a given in Pattaya.

That was in 2021, and those judges (including SCOTUS) didn't rule on the merits or the facts. Just the standing. It's been going mostly the other direction since then.

That's less than 1%. We're talking almost 40%.

Almost 40% of voters in the USA no longer trust the results. It's okay if 40% disagree on the issues. But we have big problems when 40% don't trust the outcome.

Or closer to home, prove that the election wasn't stolen.

It's cute that some people still think that Wikipedia is a reliable source.

Will Harris' Leadership Unite or Divide the Nation? No. She'd have to win, to do either. (I added that for the linear thinkers who insist on having the obvious spelled out for them)

So, it was really just 1999 Mules, and they were forced to take it down because they got one wrong. If even 10% of the malfeasance shown in those documentaries was true, that would have been enough to change the election results.

Your link is from Feb 2021. You need to catch up. The rulings have been mostly in the Repubs' favor once they got the standing issues ironed out. Just this week, the PA Supreme Court agreed that improperly dated mail in ballots will not be counted like they were (illegally) in 2020. That's between paragraph 41 and 63 in the TX vs PA lawsuit, which I'm pretty sure you didn't bother to read once your mind was made up by the MSM. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-ballots-incorrect-dates-rcna170819

You mean the guv'ner who operates charities in Haiti, or the mayor, who has quite a few properties rented out to Haitians on the gub'ment dime? I can't imagine why either one would be miffed if anyone said something bad about the Haitians, or they'd be real eager to defend their customers and keep the revenue flowing. https://www.daytondailynews.com/local/ohio-gov-dewines-deep-connections-to-haiti-inform-response-to-springfield-controversy https://buckeyereporter.com/stories/664310242-special-report-renting-apartments-to-haitians-is-big-business-for-springfield-mayor-rob-rue-others And neither one of those potential conflicts of interest would have come to light if not for the "they eat cats" memes. The gift that keeps on giving, to expose the consequences of open borders. 3D chess.

I know that the OP isn't really interested. If he was, I'd suggest watching the following: Absolute Proof Rigged 2000 Mules Stop the Steal Then, read the Texas vs PA (et al) lawsuit from December, 2020, along with the Amicus briefs signed by 126 congressmen (under threat of perjury) and 18 states that there were enough irregularities to warrant holding off certifying the results until the issues were resolved in court. Or, you can continue to say that there's no evidence. Up to you.

After this disaster of an interview campaign ad, I don't blame them. Kamala.mp4 I hope she's getting the help she needs.

You may as well have asked for evidence that The Gulf of Tonkin was a lie between1964 when it happened and 1971 when The Pentagon Papers leaked out. We won't know the truth for years, if ever. Maybe during Trump's next term... Otherwise it'll be after Pelosi, Clinton(s), Obama and the rest shuffle off their mortal coils, or the statutes of limitations expire. Hillary says the Russkies stole 2016, and she'd never lie. And Wray just came out and said the Russkies have been meddling for years and years. So I'm really questioning the narrative that 2000 was the most fair and secure election in the history of elections. Meantime, 40% of the voters don't trust the results, including millions of Dems.

I don't suppose there's any chance that the Harris campaign is paying bookies to lie, or paying bettors to bet on Harris. FFS, they're paying out $millions to get influencer to say nice things and even more to show up at events. Why not offer to cover bettors' losses if it makes Harris look more popular? You're thinking checkers. This is chess.

The way I read the OP, those groups are confident that the borders will remain wide ass open if Harris is elected. Trump couldn't buy a more effective message to convince people to vote for him.

Doesn't mean he's wrong How about showing us why he's wrong? You know... Evidence.

Why would it be? Here's a screenshot of my inbox. Is it that hard to believe I unsubscribed? Or that I did it just now, since 3:02 this morning?

That's just mean. Funny. But mean.

My sister's Chatty Kathy doll could do that back in the '70s. She's just an updated model.

All that link proves is that there are forms of identification available. Now, provide me the number of illegals who have actually identified, submitting fingerprints and a current residence. Good luck finding that info.

I'm sorry, but you're going to have to provide a link for that whopper.

The key in that statement is "arrest rate". It's tougher to catch them when there are no fingerprints or address or DNA on file.

Trust those who put their $$ where their mouth is - the bettors. Yeah, because no bettor has ever been caught cheating or throwing a contest.