They were going strong until they got lazy and used "potholes" and "engines running" in the caption. Surely there was space for rapids, turbulent waters and keeping new car sales afloat etc. 😁
Wait, isn't he barred from being involved (publicly at least) in politics?? Is this just some <deleted> show to create an excuse for a party dissolution and then a coup? (party gets dissolved and army takes over but Thaksin is allowed to remain in country)
The most bizarre thing about this case is that at the end of it all, many people might face justice (time behind bars, fines, suspended sentences etc.), however, the driver of the vehicle that killed a cop won't receive any consequences at all.
Which is what they could've done when MFP proposed, PROPOSED! amendments to Section 112. You know, like how parliament in an actual constitutional democracy is supposed to work.
Kind of like foreign drug convictions not being recognized. That BS aside, I still call BS on this interpretation from Supamas - I'm pretty sure many visiting professors are called professor when they come to lecture here.
Now whether her foreign qualification are legit is a topic for another thread.
"Bullying" is targeted and repeated negative behaviours towards an individual. A 3 year old accidentally or otherwise hitting another kid with a toy is naughty at most. This article is really fishing. 😒
Off topic (slightly), but related to the EC and their decision making process: When was Prayuth made a member of the privy council? I read an article alluding to his position there, but don't remember ever reading about the announcement in the news.
I have a new passport that I have not yet updated at the bank. However, I opened the bank account when I worked in Thailand and nowadays I enter on visa exempt. Will the bank give me any issues regarding my account if they notice I don't have a long-term visa anymore?
Well, there go all the theories about the 49% voting rights being shared proportionately by the foreign quota. And what a complicated extra step - now a buyer will have to know whether they are part of the 49% normal or 26% extra quota. Also, can one change from one to the other? Once again, Thai politicians take a simple process and complicate it (with good reason: grey areas are easier to manipulate when required)
Does anyone know the exact requirements for changing a leasehold property to a freehold property. Is it just a case of the owner willing to sell as freehold instead of leasehold? (Seller is Thai and buyer is Thai)
If the EC didn't provide enough evidence, then they should lost the case. Isn't that how it works? The court asking for more evidence is basically them saying "Find the evidence so we can provide a guilty verdict". Total BS