puck2

Oh please not bevor the next TV meeting tomorrow in the evening, US time.

I would like to see if this "irresistible celebrity" will be successful in kissing Hillary and ... you know ... !

Poor, poor Mr. Trump, all your presidental dreams ballooned now.

Your shattered dreams:

putting your hand and fingers between the legs of such „nice“ girls like Angela, Theresa and maybe madame Le Pen etc. ...Bang, bang, over and done with.

You charming man would have won every battle …... in your (dream)bed. What a pity that Russia doesn't have a female leader.

Being married (yourself) no problem for you. Maybe the model you named fat and piggy said no to your wolfish advances???

You are a real dreamboat of US President considering some US rightwing TV-Members.

On ‎03‎.‎10‎.‎2016 at 9:21 AM, DiamondKing said:

IT WAS LEGAL 

 

END OF 

 

All he did is use the current laws to his advantage THAT IS SMART BUSINESS

Yes, Trump is/was using so-called (but wanted) legal loopholes. And you seem to be very happy that your darling did it. It's so smart to let the taxpayers pay for some not so smart incapable business men - your opinion.

At the same time you and the other rightwings are not so happy about Obama's/Clinton's plan to lift the taxes ….. because people like Trump avoided the taxes …. ehm, legally.

What did some highly intelligent Trump-lovers and , of course, Trump himself say?

"A very clever businessman" 

OMG US America; congratulation to such a (criminal) candidate.

For me it was very interesting to read Trump's childish and Thai-style excuse for his poor and at the end uncontrolled performance:

it was the ….. microphone   

I have read a nice comment about T.'s remark:

If a farmer isn't able to swim the reason for his bumbling incompetence are the swim trunks.

google -->

Contact Dr. Vachiraporn (dermatologist) and/or Dr. Somboon (plastic surgery) in RAM-Hospital Chiang Mai.

I guess you know what a "loser" is. But that's your kind to deflect from the content of my input.

As Trump urgently needs money for his election campaign it seems he promises support the war industry if winning the job.

1 hour ago, Ulysses G. said:

 

Yep. He did it strategically. He made a lot of money off the deal.

Back to the imbecilic left wing talking points.

What a perverted opinion, defending "strategically" bankruptcy for making money. It's a pity that you haven't been a looser within Trump's strategical bankruptcy.

........Nehlen attracted support from

Sarah Palin and conservative provocateur Ann Coulter, with the latter appearing alongside Nehlen in the district over the weekend.

This doesn't need any comment.

In general this thread together with a lot of others improves again and again that the USA is a money-craty. Without (donated) money you don't have any chance in the politics/elections. But there is only a small backlash. When in politics you have to "pay" back.

The ugly joke: this power of the money was re-installed by the Rep-dominated highest US court by lifting the limit of donations. This is like giving the riches an unlimited influence and power.

On 10.8.2016 at 1:41 PM, ClutchClark said:

 

And that emoticon of a moron falling on the floor appears to be a very good choice for you based on the simpleness of your post. 

 

Politicians throughout America are stealing it blind and all you can see is a few $100 grand that Trump may or may not have misspent.

 

Please tell me you are not a product of our college system today. 

You behave like your darling: personal attacks instead of delivering true facts,.

As one member wrote today : don't give an answer to such a right wing, they will not acknowledge the facts. Fact is -->

...............

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/9f7412236962464f9f2c0a8d2696ba25/trumps-campaign-cycles-6-million-trump-companies

Wealthy political candidates in the past, including New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and presidential contender Steve Forbes both walled off their campaigns from the companies bearing their names.

Not so for Trump. Through the end of May, his campaign had plowed about $6 million back into Trump corporate products and services, a review of federal filings shows. That's nearly 10 percent of his expenditures.

There's nothing illegal about it. Regulations do require companies— even ones owned by the candidate— to charge fair-market value so as not to run afoul of a ban on corporate campaign contributions.  ........ 

But... if you should be a "product of (y)our college system", guess what I think about the value your college system.

25 minutes ago, ClutchClark said:

 

Come on Boomer, you're just playing with us.

 

I don't know any politician yet who doesn't try and spend someone elses money as quickly as possible...after all, there isn't a one of them that can ever be sure he/she won't be arrested tomorrow for their frequent transgressions. 

 

Republicans just spend it on different things than Dems but one thing is certain--some of it always gets diverted back into their own pockets. 

 

 

I guess you are talking about your darling TRUMP (party meeting in his hotels, payed by donations )

@willyumcr

Think about how many people had a delayed appointment when YOU have had your urgent retina surgery. Everybody knows that a retina detachment needs an immediate surgery and appointments are not so urgent.

And you poor boy have to complain about delayed appointments after being "satisfied with doctor and hospital" ?

Are you sure you had to wait so long because you are a "Caucasian?

After watching and hearing Michelle Obama's speech my idea was:

this should be the next President of the USA after Clinton.

She has all what what the egomaniac and bullethead Trump doesn't has:

intelligence (the right-wings think: having money = intelligent ) , control about herself, experience in politics, no bold behavior, (no big belly as Trump!), a controlled language you need for the presidential job, not breeding disunion, reliable, not changing her mind within a few days, if it seems opportunistic etc., etc.

This Reps bite on Hillary's e-mail affair, because there are no other more important "affairs". And concerning Michelle's weak points the Reps will bite in the air or in their own but.

It will be interesting to see the TV fights between Hillary and Trump. If not informed about the questions of the journalists in advance about the content there will be only one winner: HILLARY. Good luck. The Western world doesn't like this symbol of hate, Trump, to be a US president.

It's my guess that they will soon require it be submitted with EVERY visit to Immigration. They don't care about the paperwork. While in there last month I noticed several waist-high stacks of bundles of filled applications, neatly tied in 6" thick bundles. The pile was at least a meter wide leaning against the wall, and stacked 3-4 deep, waist high. Thousands upon thousands of filled application forms... awaiting.... what?

...... not to be wasted, but to be sold, I guess.

Give them the (right) bank account number?

Sorry immigration, if you give me the written guarantee that your datas are safe by 100% and that you would give me back the stolen money in the case of stolen Immi-datas then I would think about giving this information. But everybody knows about "TiT", no responsibility if mistakes or flaws in the bureaucracy become publicly known.

We have the verified information by a village officer that there are (police?)spys in plain clothes in the village. Some questions - i.e. concerning my favorite places - fit these "controls". I guess our village is not the only one in T. with such a kind of informers. Although I have nothing to hide there should be a limit. Especially I will answer the question of my favorite places as follows: toilet, reading newspaper.

All these questions are as useful as an appendix.

Mrs. May is already going to buy a lot of thick knee-pads for her foreign minister.

Why?

He will urgently need them for all the prostrations before a lot of world statesman and -women who received "friendly" nicknames from BJ.

And they will ask him: "Smart buffoon, concerning your recent history, how many minutes, hours or days can we trust you?".

Then J. will be as smart as ever ......

BoJo is a very smart man!

Mrs. May, send your new "star minister" for a long time to the diplomatic school before he will "enjoy" you and the world.

Hague ruling is largely symbolic; how would they back it up, with an EU army? No lover of the Chinese but whatever the EU says/demands is just funny. Want to punish China; boycott Chinese-made goods because, aside from 'security' and fish, this SCSea farce is mostly about resources to churn out more crap.

A typical nonsense comment of "well informed" people.

It is already explained by other members that this court - ICC - is a world institution with its office in Le Hague, Europe. It's obvious that there are several members with the same problem in this forum.

What would you say if the Chinese or another state would take the top US - Iraq war criminals (GW Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and others) to this court because of their felony?

Probable answer of the USA: that doesn't work, we are not member of the ICC.

Copy/excerpt of -->

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_International_Criminal_Court

........Positions in the United States concerning the ICC vary widely. The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not submit it for Senate ratification. The Bush Administration, the US administration at the time of the ICC's founding, stated that it would not join the ICC. The Obama Administration has subsequently re-established a working relationship with the court. ........

Guess, why the Bush administration didn't sign the Rome statute (like China) ?

And now the US community would like to condemn the Chinese reaction. Very hypocritical !

I question the common sense of the Reps.

Under their regime there was a fabricated war in Iraq with more than 4.000 US soldiers and up to half a million Iraqis killed not to mention the incredible huge number of badly injured people and their demolished homes and future during and after this war. This alone deserved a second Nuremberg. But nothing happened, nobody of the real responsible in jail, a shame.

And now .... Mrs. Clinton had the official e-mails on her private PC. An incredible crime, if you follow the Reps . That's the reason why a normal brain questions the Reps memory, common sense, IQ and moral.

The Reps have lost any judgment about what is a real crime. They think only for themselves and not for their nation.

• Bank Of England have wanted to weaken our currency for a long time so what better reason than the Brexit.
• British pound was going to get weaker no matter what because that's what's required to make our exports cheaper and erode our debt.
• Pound will stabilize and get back to near normal as they stabilize the political situation.

Wow. Yup, that's your Brexit voter. GBP in the toilet, recession on it's way but good on ya, you won.

Thank you.

Yes we did.

Perhaps, the Brexiters will gain ......... some experience.

Experience #1:

don't trust your guides!

When the door opens they push you for fighting the problems, whereas they are leaving through the backdoor.

Experience #2:

don't rely on your guides.

They promise and lie so much during their campaign that they have to find some craven excuses for leaving the brexiters alone, knowing they couldn't fulfill what they promised.

Experience #3:

Much talking isn't identically equal to big knowledge.

Johnson, Farage didn't have any concrete and convincing ideas for the time after Brexit.

Experience #4:

Don't believe liars.

For me it's hard to understand that Johnson was a "darling", especially for the English. He has lost his (journalist) job 2 times because of lying. Of course, sometimes it's "unavoidable" for politicians to lie. But if it concerns very serious issues?

I'm afraid that the government of the Brexiters once will knock on the doors of the European Bank in Frankfurt for joining the €

Don't be surprised when the US$ gets devalued by a 1/3 before year end. Most countries have been selling off U.S. Treasuries for many months.

caution... big clown

Caution....troll, not a big clown, a retired banker!

Here some excerpts of your comments

"Attached is an example I prepared today in an Excel worksheet based upon US$-THB exchange rate. <............> I then applied todays rate at the time I prepared this which was of 35.02, then, 30 and 24.54 rates (a possible 30% devaluation off todays rate) to depict how the retreating dollar or your own home currency can require a substantial increase in home funds to be deposited in a Thai bank to meet the combination, retirement financial qualifications."

"Don't be surprised when the US$ gets devalued by a 1/3 before year end. Most countries have been selling off U.S. Treasuries for many months."

"Just because you have 800,000 + THB in a Thai bank there is something else that can create problems, a THB devaluation!"

When reading this I thought you were a banker of ABSURDISTAN, having a certificate of the famous Trump University, learning how to bankrupt a company.

Here we go. The Donald Trump dumpster fire of a campaign is starting to show up in the numbers. He doesn't have a prayer and the calvary is staying in at Fort Apache, riding this one out. Even if the GOP was able to screw Trump out of the nomination, who is going to take over? Mitt? Bush? Cruz? Rubio? Palin? Seriously, the GOP is history.

Bernie will dramatically support, calling for the annihilation of the Republicans and everything they stand for. The Democratic party will be united in opposition.

There is nobody who could rally the troops at this point. Trump has his low-info lemmings and that's it.

The party's over.

Yes, Madam President. Get used to it, boys.

For me it is much more important that the Dems win the majority in either chamber of the House. Otherwise you'll have the same destructice NO-policy of the Reps to all reasonabale laws as happened within the last 6 years.

Because of hopeless chances for Trump the Reps are alternatively working in this direction.

There are 2 sides of the same coin

• a political one. This means in this Brexit case the government should respect the will of the voter majority. Of course, the Brexit enthusiasts will demand follow the vote result.
• a legal side. As already excellently explaind here in this thread the vote has no binding for the parliament. Referring to @ impulse, if you start a referendum about about paying no taxes - and the majority would agree - then think about the value of such a referendum and the binding for the parliament.

In this Brexit case it has been obvious the majority of (a lot of obviously uninformed) voters made their decision with their heart and NOT with their brain. The demand for a new refendum confirms this. It confirms too, that such an important decision with major implications should be made by the parliament. Believe it or not, in general they have a better and deeper information than the normal voter with his beer-pub-knowledge.

And I question again how reliable this ordinary man is. Yesterday he said

<------->

ICYMI – last month he [Farage] announced that he would fight for a second referendum on Britain in Europe if the remain campaign won by a narrow margin. Calling a small defeat for his leave camp ‘unfinished business’, he predicted a second referendum on Europe.

Back then, he told the Mirror: ‘In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way. If the remain campaign win two-thirds to one-third that ends it.’

http://metro.co.uk/2016/06/24/remember-that-time-nigel-farage-said-52-48-votes-should-lead-to-second-referendum-5963900/

Today .... ???

We do not yet know, if he will stand by his words in a siatuation just the opposite. When you have seen him celebrating the "win", you may guess, he cannot or wouldn't like to remember his intention.

BTW.

I like the British very much. But some motives for the LEAVE disturbed me during this Brexit event.

• Money.

  That so many people in Britain asked themselves how much do we earn for staying in the EU. If you want to join an organisation, a club, anassociation or such like, you consider many reasons for the membership. Money maybe one, but not the only and most imporatant one. You'll see in the future if Britain will earn money without the EU or if the Brexit vote has a losing result.

• Nationalism

  Nowadays, it seems to be old-fashioned to realise some plans or ideas, if they cost some money. To create a Europe without borders and wars (as happened in the past centuries), to support the poorer parts of Europe by the financial aid of the rich are such idea(l)s.

  I realise that this contains many problems, because not all members of a union are winners or at least moneywinners. And the success of a union cannot be seen within one year or one decade. So it was already a knife into the backside of the EU-idea when Thatcher demanded: I want my money back. Many people in Britain have been influenced by her stupid words until today. Imaagine all paying members in the EU would have said the same.

The future of Geat Britain?

Maybe the word "Great" must be removed if Scotlond builds an new state or N-Ireland will join Ireland. Nobody nows at now what will happen.

My heart goes out to the young Brtish people who in their overwhelming majority voted for STAYING. That means the majoity of the old people has hurt their own young people. Horrible!