animalmagic

Perhaps the victim should have bought a fake watch and a car. Less chance of being robbed and no need to ride a motorcycle in the pouring rain. Maybe he can use the insurance money for that

The statistics were, I presume, accurate. The conclusion from the statistics can be subjective. Changing the classification of events to move statistical data from one side of an equation to the other to allow a different subjective conclusion can be viewed as manipulation.

So, no actual data was used. Just a 'reclassification' of selected events to alter the statistics and findings.

Who debunked it, and what data was used to do so?

US Justice Dept quietly deletes own study that found far-right extremism as top terror threat | Watch

Oh, grow up. Why do I have to say sorry for a murder when it was the victim's own words that condoned the murder. NOT MINE!

There is no way my comment above can be construed as supporting murder. Your comments all seem to be making baseless and childish accusations to deflect from an accurate point of view.

Charlie Kirk supported murderers when he said some gun deaths were worth it to have the second amendment.

He doesn't discriminate when supporting war criminals

Guns are not intended for death?! What are you smoking?

The first case is an intended death, the second an unintended consequence. An embryo can be frozen and does not die, a child cannot. Is an embryo really a child?

America can't even fix it's own problems!

Fact Check: Charlie Kirk once said some gun deaths 'worth it' in order to have Second Amendment https://share.google/y64GOqFZlP8TKHpaW May want to revisit the cost benefit analysis on this. For the record, before I'm accused of being a raging, leftist anti christ, I found his talks to be eloquent and well prepared. I do not support violence in this or any other scenario.

Win win situation?

That's because nothing out of the ordinary is occurring!

Yes. So if Andrews commits the sex crime overseas he can still be charged under UK law.

I think you will find that many countries have laws covering the extraterritorial exploitation of minors. Basically, if the victim is under the age of consent in your country it doesn't matter where in the world you commit the crime.

At least he might learn what a parade really looks like.

And the other 75% can't add up

Nah, that's Kristi Noem's job!

The Native Americans were given land of low pastoral and arable value while the settlers kept the best for themselves. For a people whose very existence was based on a relationship with the land that sustained them this was tantamount to a death sentence for many, and a total destruction of their society with education and other opportunities withheld from them. That the land later proved to have valuable oil deposits is irrelevant; if it was known at the time it would never have been given to them by the settlers. The Native Americans proved to be very smart and studied anyway, finding opportunity in the law for them to build and run casinos. Taking full advantage of the fools who thought that the 'american dream' comes from a roll of a dice. It is extremely disingenuous to try and make a case that the settlers did them a favour.

Good deflection. It does depend on which native Americans you are talking about. You are talking about a very small percentage of them. Please tell us about the others.

A bit like the Native Americans then?

So does the draft beer!

Hopefully he went across the Cambodian border and cleared a few land mines on his way!