Bacon1

Vulgar post removed @Ralf001

Fighting continues along the disputed Thailand-Cambodia border even after U.S. President Donald Trump said he had brokered a ceasefire deal. Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul repeated on December 13 that Thailand will keep up military action until it feels secure, with fighter jets striking targets hours after Trump’s announcement. Cambodia has welcomed a Malaysian ceasefire proposal but fighting persists. The clash erupted on December 7 in one of the heaviest bouts of violence along the 817-km frontier, where both sides have exchanged heavy weapons fire across multiple provinces. A truce brokered in July, with Trump’s backing in October, had momentarily eased tensions but collapsed after Thai soldiers were injured by a landmine, which Thailand blames on Cambodia. Hundreds of thousands of people on both sides have been displaced by the renewed hostilities. Trump said he spoke with Anutin and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet on Friday and that both leaders agreed to “cease all shooting” and return to the previous peace accord, including a proposed ASEAN observer mission with U.S. satellite support. Thailand’s foreign minister stressed a ceasefire cannot be declared amid active conflict and needs talks beforehand. Hun Manet expressed support for Malaysian mediator Anwar Ibrahim’s call to halt hostilities from Saturday evening. Thai leaders countered Trump’s claim, saying there was no agreement to stop fighting. Anutin said military actions “already spoke” and Thailand will not halt until threats end, while Thai defence officials confirmed cross-border exchanges. Observers say international diplomatic efforts may face challenges as both countries navigate battlefield developments and political pressures. Key Takeaways Thailand rejects Trump’s ceasefire claim and vows continued military action against Cambodia. A truce brokered earlier this year fell apart after renewed clashes and landmine incidents. ASEAN mediation efforts, including proposed observer missions, are ongoing but unconfirmed. Thailand vows to keep fighting Cambodia after Trump ceasefire claim | Reuters https://share.google/oZnF9ct0wxvVjUZ8b

China held a subdued memorial ceremony on Dec. 13, 2025, to mark the 88th anniversary of the 1937 Nanjing Massacre, a day that traditionally honors the roughly 300,000 people China says were killed by Japanese troops in the then-capital. The event, held at the national memorial centre in Nanjing, was notably low-key and lacked attendance by President Xi Jinping, drawing attention amid already strained ties with Japan. The ceremony came as Beijing and Tokyo’s diplomatic relationship faces tension linked to remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggesting Japan could militarily respond if China attacked Taiwan, a claim that has angered Chinese officials. In previous years, the memorial has been a more prominent national event, with Xi attending in 2017; his absence this year was not explained. At the event, Shi Taifeng, a senior Communist Party official, spoke briefly, condemning attempts to revive militarism and highlighting historical resilience, but his remarks were measured compared with recent fiery government rhetoric. Aside from the official ceremony, China’s Eastern Theatre Command posted nationalist imagery on social media, reflecting lingering historical grievances. The subdued tone of the memorial suggests Beijing balanced remembering history with avoiding further escalation of regional diplomatic tensions with Tokyo. In China, the Nanjing Massacre remains a deeply emotive issue, and ceremonies like this reinforce the historical narrative that is central to national memory and foreign policy rhetoric. Looking ahead, analysts expect that historical commemoration will continue to factor into China-Japan relations and broader East Asian geopolitics, particularly as tensions over Taiwan and regional security persist. How each side manages historical memory and contemporary diplomacy may influence future interactions between the two governments. Key Takeaways China held a low-key memorial on Dec. 13, 2025, for the Nanjing Massacre with Xi Jinping absent. Senior official Shi Taifeng spoke, emphasizing resistance to militarism amid Japan-China tensions. The subdued event reflects efforts to balance historical commemoration with current diplomatic strains. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Reuters 2025-12-13

Iraq and the United Nations officially closed the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) in a ceremony in Baghdad on December 13, ending a 22-year mission that began after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. The visit by U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted Iraq’s progress toward political stability, reconstruction, and self-governance, while reaffirming the ongoing partnership between Iraq and the U.N. as the country enters a new chapter focused on development and cooperation. UNAMI was established by U.N. Security Council resolution in 2003 at Iraq’s request to help coordinate post-conflict humanitarian aid, political dialogue, elections, and rebuilding efforts. In May 2024, the Council approved extending the mission’s mandate for a final period ending December 31, 2025, allowing for an orderly transition of responsibilities to Iraqi authorities. At the closing ceremony, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani thanked the U.N. for its decades of support and emphasized that ending the mandate does not end cooperation. Guterres praised Iraq’s journey from war and instability toward governance and economic growth, noting that although the political mission concludes, many U.N. agencies and programs — such as UNICEF, WHO, and UNDP — will continue to support Iraq’s long-term development. Both leaders said the relationship between Iraq and the United Nations will shift to more normalized ties focused on sustainable development, human rights, and institutional strengthening. A symbolic gesture in Baghdad will rename a street “United Nations Street” in honor of the mission and the 22 U.N. staff members killed in a 2003 attack. Key Takeaways UNAMI ends after 22 years: Iraq officially closes the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq, a long-standing political and reconstruction support mission. Ongoing cooperation: Iraq and the U.N. stressed that collaboration will continue through development frameworks and remaining U.N. agencies. Focus on future: The shift from a political mission to development support underlines Iraq’s progress towards stability, self-reliance, and institutional strengthening. Adapted by ASEAN Now from source 2025-12-13

Three Americans — two U.S. service members and an American civilian interpreter — were killed in a deadly ambush by an Islamic State gunman in Palmyra, central Syria on December 13, 2025, prompting U.S. President Donald Trump to promise “very serious retaliation” if U.S. forces are targeted again. The lone attacker was killed by partner forces, and three other U.S. troops were wounded in the incident. U.S. Central Command said the ambush occurred in a part of Syria not fully controlled by the Syrian government, where American and allied forces are conducting ongoing counter-ISIS operations. President Ahmed al-Sharaa of Syria, whose government has moved closer to Washington, expressed anger and devastation over the attack. This marks the first lethal assault on U.S. personnel in Syria since the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in late 2024. At the White House and on social media, Trump called the shooting an “ISIS attack against the U.S. and Syria” and stressed that the three wounded troops “seem to be doing pretty well.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pentagon officials warned that the U.S. will pursue anyone who harms American forces and vowed consequences for future attacks. Syrian officials confirmed that the gunman fired during a joint U.S.–Syrian operation and was neutralized. The incident highlights the persistent threat of Islamic State remnants despite the group’s territorial defeat in 2019 and underscores ongoing risks for coalition forces in eastern and central Syria. It could complicate the evolving U.S.–Syrian security relationship and influence future counter-terrorism strategies. Analysts note that Trump’s retaliation pledge may lead to intensified operations against IS elements or shifts in U.S. military posture in the region. Looking ahead, the U.S. is expected to consult with regional partners on how to respond operationally while balancing diplomatic engagement with Syria’s interim government. The Pentagon is likely to review force protection measures for deployed troops, and policymakers in Washington may weigh additional military or strategic actions against Islamic State networks that remain active across Syria and Iraq. Key Takeaways Three Americans, including two U.S. soldiers, were killed in an ISIS ambush in Syria on December 13, 2025, leading Trump to vow serious retaliation. The attack occurred in central Syria where U.S. and allied forces are engaged in counter-terrorism operations against Islamic State remnants. U.S. officials warn that future attacks on American personnel will be met with force, potentially shaping upcoming military and diplomatic actions. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Express 2025-12-13

Belarus has released 123 prisoners, including high-profile opposition figures and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, following the United States’ decision to lift sanctions on key Belarusian exports. The releases occurred on Saturday 13 December 2025, marking the largest such act by Minsk in years and immediately affecting families and the diplomatic landscape. The move comes after two days of talks in Minsk between Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and U.S. special envoy John Coale, representing President Donald Trump’s administration. The discussions secured the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Belarusian potash, a vital part of the country’s economy, in exchange for the pardons. Among those freed were Nobel Peace Prize winner Ales Bialiatski, imprisoned since 2021, and leading protest figure Maria Kolesnikova, sentenced to 11 years after the 2020 anti-Lukashenko protests. Other prominent detainees include former presidential candidate Viktar Babaryka, lawyer Maxim Znak, and various foreign nationals from allied countries. Human rights groups reported that many prisoners had suffered deteriorating health in custody and that more than 1,000 political prisoners remain jailed despite this release. Lukashenko continues to deny that these detainees were held for political reasons, instead branding them as criminals. Reactions have been mixed: relatives thanked the U.S. for pressuring Minsk, while opposition leaders warned that easing sanctions could undermine ongoing efforts for broader political reforms. Western diplomats see this as a diplomatic breakthrough that could shift Belarus away from Russian influence, although critics remain skeptical of Lukashenko’s intentions. Looking ahead, further prisoner releases and continued sanctions negotiations are expected, as Washington and Minsk signal a desire to normalize relations. Opposition figures, however, urge that EU sanctions remain in place to support democratic change and accountability in Belarus. Key Takeaways Belarus released 123 prisoners, including Ales Bialiatski and Maria Kolesnikova, after the U.S. lifted sanctions on Belarusian potash. The deal followed talks between Lukashenko and U.S. envoy John Coale aimed at improving diplomatic ties. Despite the mass release, more than 1,000 political prisoners remain incarcerated in Belarus. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Guardian 2025-12-13

Flame removed @JK-Trilly 9. You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the forum or sent by private message are not allowed.

A large three-year clinical trial found that weekly tirzepatide treatment dramatically reduced body weight and sharply cut the risk of developing type 2 diabetes in adults with obesity and prediabetes, offering immediate hope for patients facing both conditions. Obesity and prediabetes increase the likelihood of progressing to type 2 diabetes and are linked to serious health complications globally. In this trial, participants received once-weekly tirzepatide at doses of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg, or a placebo, over 176 weeks followed by a 17-week off-treatment period. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide led to marked and sustained weight loss at 176 weeks: participants lost far more body weight across all doses than those on placebo. Notably, rates of new type 2 diabetes diagnoses were much lower in tirzepatide groups (2.4 %) than in the placebo group (13.7 %). Researchers observed mostly gastrointestinal side effects during the early dose-escalation phase, but no new safety concerns emerged during the long-term follow-up. The outcomes underscore tirzepatide’s dual benefit—weight reduction and diabetes prevention—in a high-risk population. Experts say these results reinforce tirzepatide’s role as a potent therapeutic option that could shift treatment strategies for obesity and prediabetes, addressing two major public-health challenges simultaneously. Looking ahead, further real-world studies and longer follow-up in diverse populations will help clarify long-term impacts, optimal dosing strategies, and how best to integrate tirzepatide into broader metabolic disease care. Key Takeaways • Tirzepatide produced significant, sustained weight loss in adults with obesity and prediabetes compared with placebo. • The risk of developing type 2 diabetes was markedly lower with tirzepatide versus placebo over three years. • No new long-term safety issues were identified beyond earlier reported gastrointestinal effects. Adapted From https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2410819

Post removed @theshu25 Banter is ok, so long as it's respectful. Rudeness is not. Community Standards Be polite and respectful to other users.

Eating for two, papa 😁

Troll post removed @theshu25

British photographer Mark Meth-Cohn has won the 2025 Nikon Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards with his image “High Five,” showing a young gorilla seemingly dancing in a forest clearing in Rwanda, capturing widespread attention for its joyful timing. The overall win was announced on December 9, 2025, at the London awards presentation, marking a high point in this year’s competition. This year’s contest drew a record-breaking 10,000 entries from 109 countries, the highest number in the event’s eleven-year history, with the grand prize and category honors selected from the top shortlist of finalists. Other standout winners included a frog “baptism” photo by Grayson Bell, which also took home the junior award, and a smiling underwater fish captured by Jenny Stock. Organizers and wildlife fans alike praised the images for blending humor with storytelling, highlighting moments that reveal animals’ unexpected expressions and behaviors in nature. Entries ranged from expressive bears and yawning lions to clever bird shots, reinforcing the competition’s reputation for celebrating the playful side of the natural world. The contest, sponsored by Nikon, also maintains a conservation focus, with part of its proceeds supporting wildlife causes. Experts and photographers have noted that the awards help raise awareness about animal behavior and habitats by engaging wider audiences through humor and creativity. Many participants said the exposure and recognition encouraged further wildlife photography efforts across age groups, including young photographers like Bell. Looking ahead, the winning and highly commended photos from the 2025 Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards are expected to be showcased in exhibitions and online galleries, continuing to bring attention to both artistic wildlife imagery and the broader message of conservation in 2026 and beyond. Key Takeaways British photographer Mark Meth-Cohn won the 2025 Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards with “High Five,” a dancing gorilla image. The contest set a new record with 10,000 submissions from 109 countries, reflecting global participation. Winners and finalists highlight humorous wildlife moments while promoting interest in animal behavior and conservation. Adapted From https://121clicks.com/inspirations/2025-comedy-wildlife-photography-awards-winners/

What are the major Jewish holidays?

Friends and family across Jewish communities are preparing for the eight-day festival of Hanukkah beginning Dec. 14, 2025, amid renewed discussion about what the holiday actually commemorates. The event has immediate cultural impact as it blends ancient history with modern identity, prompting reflection on both spiritual and historical elements of Jewish tradition. Hanukkah marks the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in 164 B.C.E. after the Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes defiled it and Judean forces led by the Hasmoneans (Maccabees) recaptured it. The story combines a historical military victory with a later rabbinic tradition about a miraculous oil supply that lasted eight nights. Modern Jews vary in how they view the holiday’s meaning. Some emphasize the ancient military struggle and assertion of autonomy, rooted in the pre-rabbinic core of the celebration. Others prioritize the miracle of light, as reflected in the Talmudic narrative about the menorah oil’s eight-day burn, which became central in rabbinic Judaism. Experts note that rabbinic Judaism reshaped Hanukkah’s message away from military triumph toward faith and spiritual resilience. Historian Malka Simkovich explains that this shift highlights “unconditional and miraculous divine light…even in the gloomiest of darkness.” The holiday’s meaning continues to evolve in contemporary discourse. Some Jewish groups, including ultra-Orthodox and liberal communities, dispute Zionist reinterpretations that spotlight nationalist themes, while others engage with both strands of tradition. Looking ahead, Hanukkah celebrations this December will likely reflect ongoing debates about identity and tradition, with family rituals such as menorah lighting, gift sharing, and festive foods taking place alongside public discussion of the festival’s layered history and significance. Key Takeaways Hanukkah begins Dec. 14, 2025, and combines remembrance of a 164 B.C.E. military victory with a later-emphasized miracle of oil in the Temple menorah. Rabbinic Judaism historically reframed the holiday’s focus from military prowess to spiritual light and resilience. Contemporary Jewish communities vary widely in how they interpret and celebrate Hanukkah’s meanings. Adapted From https://theconversation.com/hanukkah-celebrates-both-an-ancient-military-victory-and-a-miracle-of-light-modern-jews-can-pick-from-either-tradition-271624

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt31495504/

News that Netflix is negotiating to buy Warner Bros. Discovery’s assets in an US $83 billion deal has sent shock waves through the entertainment world, raising concerns that media power will concentrate into fewer hands and reduce competition. The bid involves Netflix potentially acquiring Warner Bros.’ film, TV, and streaming operations, upending decades of industry structure and prompting a wider battle with Paramount and political scrutiny. Industry observers warn this move could reshape Hollywood competition and diminish choices for both creators and audiences if a dominant platform owns major content libraries and distribution channels. The deal comes amid a resurgence of entertainment oligopolies—large vertically integrated media firms that dominated Hollywood in the early 20th century before being broken up by antitrust actions like the 1948 Paramount Decision. Netflix’s model of streaming content directly to subscribers has already challenged traditional studios and sparked rapid consolidation as competitors sought scale. Warner Bros. itself has changed hands many times, most recently after AT&T acquired Time Warner in 2018 and later sold it to Discovery in 2022 for US $43 billion; the company became a top streaming contender behind Netflix and Disney+. Critics argue that if Netflix (or rival bidder Paramount) gains control of Warner Bros., Netflix could further limit consumer choice and exert greater pricing power, squeezing audiences and independent creators. The consolidation trend also coincides with rising influence of artificial intelligence in production, meaning the combined media giants could shape how vast historical libraries are used in future creation. Paramount’s hostile counterbid and political interest—especially from figures like President Donald Trump—underline the fierce debate around market concentration and antitrust enforcement going forward. Key Takeaways • Netflix’s proposed US $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. could significantly concentrate entertainment industry power. • The merger revives concerns about media oligopolies similar to those broken up by the 1948 Paramount Decision. • Rival bids and political scrutiny highlight ongoing antitrust and competitive implications. Adapted From https://theconversation.com/whether-netflix-or-paramount-buys-warner-bros-entertainment-oligopolies-are-back-bigger-and-more-anticompetitive-than-ever-271479

Flames & replies removed

Hotel

House Democrats have unveiled a new set of photographs from the estate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, showing former presidents Donald Trump and Bill Clinton among other high-profile figures. The images, released as part of an oversight committee review, have reignited scrutiny of Epstein’s connections with powerful individuals. The first batch of 19 photos was made public by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee after the panel received nearly 100,000 images from Epstein’s estate. Some pictures show Trump with unnamed women and Epstein at social events, while others feature Clinton with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Also depicted in the released photographs are figures such as Steve Bannon, Bill Gates, Woody Allen and Richard Branson, underscoring the breadth of Epstein’s social circle. One image of Clinton appears to be autographed. Democrats described the photos as “disturbing” and said they raise further questions about Epstein’s associations with wealthy and influential people. Committee members called for transparency and justice for Epstein’s victims as they continue to review additional material. Republicans and the White House pushed back, accusing Democrats of selectively releasing images to generate political headlines and asserting that no wrongdoing is shown. The White House maintained that the administration has supported efforts to provide information to Epstein’s victims. The release comes amid ongoing legal and legislative actions tied to Epstein’s files. A bipartisan law signed recently requires the Department of Justice to make hundreds of thousands of pages of related documents public by 19 December. More photos and documents are expected to emerge as redaction and review processes continue. Key Takeaways • Democrats released 19 photographs from Epstein’s estate featuring Trump, Clinton and other prominent figures. • The images have intensified debate over Epstein’s network and calls for transparency. **• Republicans argue the release is politically motivated and maintain it shows no wrongdoing.** Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/12/epstein-photos-trump-clinton

Potassium. With Valsartan, Potassium intake has to be limited to keep it balanced within the body https://www.nhcs.com.sg/news/murmurs/what-you-eat-can-affect-your-medication

Flame removed @Packer Community Standards Do not post defamatory, offensive, or discriminatory content.

Former BBC news presenter Huw Edwards has deleted a newly created social media account with a professional portrait after intense public outrage and criticism from victim groups and MPs. The deletion came hours after the image was posted, as hundreds of angry responses overwhelmed the platform. The controversy has reinforced widespread condemnation of Edwards’s recent online activity. Edwards, 63, received a six-month suspended prison sentence earlier this year for possessing indecent images of children, including the most serious Category A material. He had posted the professional black-and-white headshot on Facebook, prompting speculation he was attempting to rehabilitate his public image. The account had been open since October before the backlash forced its removal. Child protection advocates and political figures responded strongly to the image. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said Edwards showed a lack of remorse and should not appear in public life again. Victim groups called the post tone-deaf, and family members of one of Edwards’s victims labelled his actions “insulting” and “shameless.” Despite condemnation, some individuals engaged with the post before its deletion. More than 400 Facebook users, including former colleagues and academics, liked or commented on Edwards’s portrait, with mixed responses. However, critics argued any positive interaction did not outweigh the broader outrage and concern over his attempt to soften public perception. Looking ahead, the episode is likely to continue shaping public debate over Edwards’s place in public life and the lasting impact of his conviction. Analysts say critics will monitor any future online activity and its implications for victims and media trust. Key Takeaways • Edwards’s professional portrait post sparked widespread condemnation and was quickly deleted. • Victim advocates and MPs criticised the move as tone-deaf and lacking remorse. • Some supporters engaged with the post, but public outrage dominated the response. Adapted From https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/huw-edwards