JCauto

Then explain this post that you made previously, the one I was responding to. There was no location or time specificity in your post. When challenged about 7 October you answered that you're only talking about violence SINCE then although it is clear that you were not, otherwise you'd have said so at the time. I pointed out that there were numerous examples of violent conflict that also involved Muslims during your now specific time period. You now say that you were only referring to Gaza. We call this "moving the goalposts". It's one of many dishonest debating tactics. You seem to use many of them. Have you ever tried an honest debating tactic, or are you so bad at it that you just won't even attempt it? No doubt this will bring out the least intelligent of the dishonest debating tactics, the ol' ad hominem. In your case, someone taught you a new word describing your posts, that being "gibberish". Now it's the only comeback you seem to have. Aren't you a bit embarrassed about being out of your league?

Read all your posts. Not one attribution of the claims you make. You're not even a decent troll - barely have enough neurons firing to respond in a coherent manner. Once again, you may claim things during debates and discussions, but when accused of making spurious or untrue statements it is your obligation to prove that you weren't just speaking extemporaneously. You've refused to even attempt to do so. If you believe I'm posting nonsense, then show me how what I have written is illogical, incorrect or otherwise made up. Because so far, that's pretty much a description of your posting history here.

When you make supposedly factual claims, then you're obligated (if you're being an honest poster) to provide some level of attribution such that we can consider whether your point was true or false. Someone who blindly states things that are challenged and then rebuts it without any facts is unlikely to gain any credibility. Not that you're much interested in credibility, I rather expect that you're just here to spread poison against whomever you dislike. But in case you're wondering why nobody will take you seriously, this is the reason.

So have you been observing the conflicts in Yemen between the Saudi and the Houthis? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they're both Muslim nations and peoples for the most part. Perhaps then you might peruse the violence ongoing in Burkina Faso, Niger, Mali and the Sahel? Perhaps the war in Sudan is more your flavour? Point I am making is not that Muslims are bad, nor that they are good. Similar things can be said about those of any religion. To pretend this is simply the only ongoing violence in the world is beyond absurd, so presuming you have control of your faculties, you've simply chosen to ignore things other than what Israel is doing. Why is that?

In that case you've got selective vision. This is why these conflicts happen, there remain fools who believe that there are only one side who are right.

Yes, precisely! Observe Europe's decline without the vital labor gaps and innovation that was brought by the British. Whereas the United Kingdom is now leading the world's economies with their innovative and vibrant economy!

This method of debate is so old the Romans had a specific phrase for it - non sequitur. It means a conclusion or reply that doesn't follow logically from the previous statement. Why are you talking about this when it had nothing to do with the previous discussion? Are you so bereft of argument that reflexively braying "Biden lie" is all you can do?

Oh sorry, was mid-coffee when I saw it.

Thank you for your compliments on my work - if I wrote something that you agreed with, I'd have to go back and make sure I hadn't misspoken. So let's see what sort of quality response we have managed to elicit...an imaginary story about Democrats with no attribution! How unusual! No doubt you'll now have to go into the Breitbart archives to unearth some minor comments by a radical individual whom you can then state is representative of all Democrats and all of their views on Mathematics. Well, I got an idea...let's see who the people who vote Democrat are with respect to education? https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/partisanship-by-race-ethnicity-and-education/ But you probably already knew that. Insert your favourite "liberal university indoctrination" meme.

She's Brazilian. Weekend at Beto's...

Yeah? Show us the video of the Democratic assault on the Capitol with the violence, the B&E, the attempts to take over the Senate...

Not sure where to start on this. Perhaps just with "there there, now put the keyboard away Mr. Riclag, it's time for your metamucil and green jello". Attacking your own pollsters is not the flex that you think it is...

LOL! Yes, sure, he really "reigned in" Rocket Boy. And I know for sure that whenever a dude refers to himself or someone they admire as an "Alpha Male", they're somewhere between psi and omega. Did you manage to scare up the $18,000 to go learn how to be like your heroes? Here's a link to the rest of you Alphas or wannabe Alphas - only $18,000 and YOU TOO COULD BE AN ALPHA MALE! Always put yourself first! Never argue with a woman! You make ALL the decisions! https://mhnministries.com/pages/alpha-male-dominance-and-masculinity-boot-camp I'm just so skeered of you macho Alphamen! LOL! EDIT: Forgot the link. Get in there Future Alpha Boys!

Just wanted to note that he said he "took" statistics, he never said anything about "passing" his statistics course...

Yes, why discuss something that has actually happened and actually been said when the words of your idol are actually written down in front of you? Better to invent an imaginary claim that nobody has ever heard or heard said. Then let's go back to the 1900's and the Civil War because that's REALLY what this election is about. LOL. It is reminding me of a certain song from the Wizard of Oz (sung by the Straw Man, so doubly apropos). Actually, that's a good allegory for our current discussion. We have Dorothy, played by Kamala Harris, and the three MAGA representing the heartless, the brainless and the cowardly.

As someone like yourself who understands mathematics, allow me to observe that this argument holds no water with those like JonnyF for whom facts are irrelevant and who basically believe that "mathematics is a lie" when it shows results they don't like. On the other hand, when the results please him, he'll be just as ready to publish his QED with the exact same margins of error. Quick JonnyF - what does QED mean? No looking it up!

How'd you feel about them polls when they showed Trump winning? That was DIFFERENT! Right?

If only she had the caliber of Jenna Ellis, or Alina Habba, or Lara Trump! Those be some smart wimmens! And they know their place too! Why Trump not have smart wimmins as running mate? Why only dumb wimmens in Republican Party? And I know you won't count Caitlyn Jenner, one of the leading intellectual lights of the MAGA movement since she ain't "real". How about MTG? Bo-bo? Is there a single woman with a brain in the Republican Party?

This evidence-free post with zero attribution brought to you by...MAGA! We're deluded, we don't care about facts, we just want to hurt other people who aren't like us.

There's far far far too many, including on these pages. However, fortunately, there's far far far too few to win an election.

Wow! Yellowtail certainly has some scoops! I had no idea that either Mitch McConnell or Joe Biden were Persons of Color! Must admit, they do hide it very well.

Drifter, Grifter, Skirt-lifter. All applicable.

He's a Far Right nutter - par for the course to blame the victim. Only surprise is that he wants the German aggressor deported - he's generally a fan of German aggressors, at least those from the past.

What a nice person you are. Unless you have some insider knowledge, and that would of course require that you have a friend, something you likely have never had, there is nothing whatsoever in that report that indicates the Belgian guy did the slightest thing wrong. In the land of Karma, let's hope some comes your way soon!