.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
JCauto
-
Posts
1,795 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by JCauto
-
-
6 minutes ago, howbri said:
There are many more than you think. We're not all liberal airheads.
Okay. So you actually believe that the Donald would have rushed in, without a gun, to confront that heavily armed gunman? Would you have done that? I sure as hell would not have. But then again, I'm a "liberal airhead" apparently, so dumb enough not to volunteer for lead ventilation.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Boon Mee said:The NRA is completely blameless in these mass shootings so Trump's advice is, as usual, correct.
Hey Boon Mee (and Freddie Royle) - do you think Trump would have run into the school without a gun if he had been there? How about if he had a gun?
Does it bother you at all that your President lies as easily as he speaks?
-
10
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, rodney earl said:There would be more people die from road deaths, drugs, prescription medicines, obesity, smoking but no one wants to do anything about a lot of that.
Except that, unlike buying guns:
1. You can't drive a car legally without getting a license that requires you to learn the rules of the road, take a test to prove you can drive, take out insurance for your car and buy a license that requires photo ID and a background check. You don't need to do any of those things to buy a gun.
2. You can't buy prescription medicine unless you see a Doctor, have a legitimate cause for getting medicine, get a script from said Doctor, and take the script along with ID to a pharmacy. You don't need to do any of those things to buy a gun.
3. Smoking - the laws restricting smoking have increased enormously, and the costs from smoking to the health care system have been reimbursed by increasing the taxes on cigarettes and other smokes to incredibly high levels, and tobacco companies have been sued numerous times and lost. Children under 18 aren't allowed to buy them either. Children under 18 can buy a gun, and gun manufacturers have had an explicit law passed by their congressional stooges that absolves them for any liability for their products so they can't even be sued. Know anyone else who has such a rider from Congress?
4. Obesity - I presume you mean fatty and sugary foods, as obesity is the result, not the cause? In that case, CONGRATULATIONS! You've finally found a parallel. And what a parallel it is, since so many people are involuntarily murdered by being smothered by fat people....
Seriously, do you pro-gun nuts even bother to engage the brain before typing?
-
3
-
1
-
Just now, JimmyJ said:
Numerous properties in the USA are posted with signs stating "Private Parking. Unauthorized parked cars will be towed."
And listing the name and phone number of the tow company.
Tow truck drivers love zooming over and towing illegally parked cars as they collect outrageous fees when the owners come to claim their cars.
I'm surprised a simple solution like these has never been attempted.
Because Thai tow truck drivers have an aversion to heavily armed and highly connected people who will be annoyed with them if they try to tow their cars and may well have them arrested if they do so?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Media1 said:
bullshit that day they took the role of enforcer. There lucky the Thai was soft. They could have been in hospital via there own weapons
Anyway I don't care for these retards
Sorry, that didn't answer the question at all. What would you do if you went to the police and after 10 years nothing whatsoever had changed? You have an answer right?
-
2 minutes ago, Media1 said:
They should contact the police. Not play mafia heavies
They did. Repeatedly. For 10 years. Didn't do a damn thing to solve the problem. So what is your other suggestion?
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Media1 said:They should be charged for wilful damage and threats of assault
They are a danger to others. Personally l would have gave her a headbutt
Are you aware of the concept of "irony"? I'm guessing "no".
-
3
-
4 minutes ago, hellstens said:
And you would be happy and walk instead I presume.lol
OK, she goes a bit to fare, would be better call the police and sort it out that way,
Sad she did not think before the act. But I understand her frustration.
You mean like the many other times she called police? So you think it's cool that to get out of your house whenever you like, you need to call the police, wait around for them (hopefully) to show up, then when they eventually do and hopefully sort out the one blocking your driveway, you can finally get on with your life? All the time?
Well, now they've got their publicity, and so they'll gain their reward. A month of people not parking outside their house before everyone forgets and things go back to the way they were. Mai pen rai!-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, z42 said:So according to this the reports of illegal parking being the cause of not getting their dying relative to hospital on time are BS, and aside from inconvenience i fail to see how they are claiming the moral high ground after smashing that motor up.
The pickup owner should get a standard ticket, and these morons a VERY hefty fine for criminal damage
So you have no issues with random people continuously blocking your driveway and not allowing your car to get out. And if this happened all the time over the course of 10 years, and you'd complained to the cops and gotten court orders and this still hadn't done anything about it, you'd still be persevering, all "jai yen yen", no worries mate? Doubt it.
-
6
-
2
-
8 minutes ago, SOUTHERNSTAR said:
What if she publicly hand herself over. If the junta refuse her to enter the country they loose if they allow her back in to go jail they loose.
That is what she should have done rather than flee, and would have done if she were a greater person like some of her sisters in neighbouring countries. It would certainly make things very interesting, but the character hasn't changed and I very much doubt she's found her courage in London or wherever else. Pity.
-
8 hours ago, MaeJoMTB said:
More of a racial/cultural/language divide IMHO
Reds (aka Lao people) Vs Yellows (aka Siam people)
If I may quote .....
"Speakers of Lao in the North and Northeast have seen the prime minister they elected into office dismissed by the courts twice, overthrown in a coup twice, and election results nullified twice. Such antics, if continued, could provoke resistance and rebellion along age-old and not-completely-forgotten ethnic lines."
Nice find and very interesting article. Thanks.
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, Eric Loh said:
This looks like the authority is setting up the scene to link her with the current demonstration. Timing of this report is highly suspicious and the new Nation owners may have much influence. Just my 2 cents opinion.
Been out of the loop - who owns the Nation now? I was most unimpressed by the story they ran extolling the Great Hunter on the day after his arrest.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
6 hours ago, ELVIS123456 said:Republicans pushed Rosenstein to explain whether a dossier with unverified allegations against Trump, some of them salacious, was used as the sole justification to open the Russia investigation and obtain surveillance warrants under former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump in May.
A senior Justice Department official, Bruce Ohr, had connections to Fusion GPS, the opposition-research company that created the dossier, which was largely financed by Clinton’s campaign.
Court papers made public on Tuesday confirmed that Ohr’s wife was paid by Fusion GPS for work tied to Trump. In a federal court affidavit, Glenn Simpson, the firm’s founder, confirmed that he met with Ohr last year, at Ohr’s request, in November after the election. Ohr was demoted last week.
Rosenstein declined to comment on matters involving the dossier.
Jordan told reporters after the hearing that “it’s time for subpoenas from our committee” because “basic facts seemed to elude the deputy attorney general.”
Asked whether a second special counsel is needed, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters Tuesday, “If we are going to investigate things, let’s look at something where there’s some real evidence.” She said Trump “has great concern about some of the conduct that’s taken place.”
It has been 'interesting' debating with Liberals about reality, but my time is up - gotta start getting ready for golf. Cant say when I will next have the time to continue the 'discussion' - but I am sure you will all be here same day same time same views.
Congratulations for actually including a reference. Unfortunately, you referenced the wrong article. Here is the correct link for the text that you quoted:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-13/gop-to-grill-rosenstein-on-anti-trump-bias-in-mueller-s-probeYour quotation shows that the Republican members asked Rosenstein a question about whether that was the sole basis for the investigation, and that he declined to answer. But we already know that the whole thing was kicked off by the leak from George Papadopoulis long before this happened. So it doesn't really matter.
Hope you had a pleasant game of golf.-
2
-
1
-
1 minute ago, ELVIS123456 said:
Trump is innocent as someone has said.
I think I'll just save time and summarize your rebuttal. It encompasses the full breadth and depth of your analysis as well as the source of all factual information that you possess.
I would recommend that you avoid the legal system. I think your ability to provide a credible defense is in question.
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, ELVIS123456 said:
all your points my "liberal snowflake' friends are nothing burgers
big fat nothing burgers - one year and nothing
by the way i have a question:
what interference did the russians do that is the cause of the investigation being started by the dems appointees, many who have been shown to be clearly biased and involved in the survelliance of trump's campaign based on a false dossier.
that's right - what was the 'interference' that russia did? what was the exact interference that lead to:
Since May 2017, a Special Counsel investigation has been led by the current Special Counsel, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017–present)
did they falsify votes?
did they cheat during the public debates?
did they use their mates to avoid an investigation?
did they give overwhelmingly negative media reports about one candidate?
what did the russians actually do??
was someone killed?
was someone kidnapped?
by 'interfere' did you mean they 'touched' hillary?
what did they do - what am i missing?
So, despite repeated requests for some facts to back up your points, we're just getting continued obfuscation and repetition of already debunked claims. I'll just put some of these to rest:
"what interference did the russians do that is the cause of the investigation being started by the dems appointees, many who have been shown to be clearly biased and involved in the survelliance of trump's campaign based on a false dossier."1. "dems appointees" - James Comey and Robert Mueller were and are lifelong Republicans, who were appointed by Republican Presidents and confirmed by Republican congress. They are highly respected law enforcement officials who reached the pinnacle of their professions after an unimpeachable career of public service, including in the case of Mueller, volunteering for and serving honourably in Vietnam. Are these the appointees to whom you are referring? You seem to think that there are a large number of people who started the investigation. There are not. There are two. These two are indisputably both Republican and of highest integrity.
2. The FBI and all other branches of government are staffed by American citizens. It is NOT a requirement of their jobs that they be apolitical or that if they do belong to a party that this disqualifies them from investigations should the investigated party be of a different political party. This has never been a requirement for any law enforcement measures, and any such requirement would be considered absurd and a complete abrogation of the basic ideal of justice and the creed, credo and credibility of law enforcement. So no, finding a few FBI agents who are Democrats and disparaging of Donald does not in any way disqualify the investigation.
3. What did the Russians do? Well, seems they hacked the voting machines in 21 States, they mobilized their security agencies to provide a massive push for Donald on social media, they leaked all sorts of disinformation that was picked up and broadcast by their bots and found their way into the minds and FB pages of the Alt-Right who were more than happy to ignore the source and veracity of these claims. What other things they did we will find out soon enough, but given the wide scope of contact, the numerous dubious financial transactions and low standards of integrity by the different Trump advisors (several of whom have been indicted and have already turned State's evidence) we can be reasonably sure that this is the tip of the iceberg.
Be patient! It will all come out in the end. And you should be both confident and push for that if you believe in the innocence of Trump and his coterie of cronies.-
2
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, ELVIS123456 said:So let me get this right.
The Dems started an investigation into Russia and Trump that has been going a year, based on a false dossier created by money from Clinton and DNC. After one year there is no evidence of any crime nor any evidence of any implication against Trump, but the Dems wont shut the investigation down (as it would show they were wrong).
Meanwhile, HRC was actually caught breaching national security laws, and deliberately bleached incriminating evidence both before and after being issued a warrant, and has been caught getting debate questions in advance, and has been implicated as involved in the false report about Trump, and has been implicated in the Clinton Foundation 'pay for play' scheme, and has been implicated in the Russia Uranium deal.
And the liberals refuse to see that something is wrong with their candidate, but think Trump is bad because he is alleged to have interfered in the election with help from Russia to win?? Wake up people !!
Putting the big ugly issues aside - HRC destroyed classified emails to avoid an investigation, HRC and DNC conspired to stop Bernie getting nominated, and HRC got the debate questions in advance - now THAT is interfering in the election !!!
You would like to get things right? Excellent! Let's start then, shall we?
"The Dems started an investigation into Russia and Trump that has been going a year, based on a false dossier created by money from Clinton and DNC. "
Incorrect - the investigation was started by the FBI and DOJ after Trump advisor George Papadopoulis drunkenly leaked information to an Australian diplomat who then subsequently informed them. That started the investigations. So your statement is completely and irrefutably false. This was the main disinformation attempt of the leaked memo, to falsely assert that the Steele dossier started the investigations. It did not."After one year there is no evidence of any crime nor any evidence of any implication against Trump, but the Dems won't shut the investigation down (as it would show they were wrong)."
Ah, the second of our esteemed TVF colleagues who has access to the FBI's investigation and documents! This is very exciting! Who would have thought that in all the internet fora in all the countries in all the world, humble ol' ThaiVisa happens to have insider information on the Russia investigation such that they can assert with complete confidence that there's been no evidence of any crime or implications against Trump! WOW!
So why don't you just shut us Libtard Snowflakes up by publishing this insider information you have?"Meanwhile, HRC...and the liberals refuse to see that something is wrong with their candidate, but think Trump is bad because he is alleged to have interfered in the election with help from Russia to win?? Wake up people !! "
Actually, I think you'd find that a significant number if not majority of those on the Left would agree with your assertion that HRC was a terrible candidate and that she along with the DNC rigged their primaries so that she became the Democrat candidate rather than Bernie. But as she is not the President, it's kind of irrelevant. That's because she has no power, is not in control of the country, and anything that she does really doesn't matter at this point. Trump, on the other hand, is President, does have power, and is under investigation. So while I'm sure you'd love to divert the discussion to the esoteric issue of the Democrats (and isn't it heartwarming to see the deep concern the Republicans have about that terrible subversion of the people's will), your man is President, and as such is the one who's under the microscope. Just like Obama was for all those years. Comes with the territory.
So as you're the party of law and order, I'm sure you'd rather that the wheels of justice turn according to their internal pace and that no interference occurs so that it prevails. I'll wait on your actual use of some facts to back up your assertions in the meantime (but likely without success).-
9
-
4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, ELVIS123456 said:you say tomato i say tomato
you are incorrect i am incorect
either way - trump is triggering and i love the show.
Actually, no. You see, when you assert something as fact, and the other people challenge you on those facts, if you wish to retain integrity, you back it up with some sort of evidence. Instead, you pretend that there are no such things as facts, and that anyone can believe anything they like so long as it supports their argument. You then acknowledge that you're basically trolling as is Trump.
At least you're being somewhat honest I guess. You don't care about facts, you don't care for facts, and you don't even attempt to pretend you're doing anything but trolling. And of course, this is what the world requires, honest, transparent leadership based on fact-based rational behaviour. I guess this is the old man equivalent of enjoying watching the world burn.-
3
-
3
-
2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Boon Mee said:Well, he's absolutely correct. Schiff threw in all kinds of material that is classified intending to make Trump appear less than opaque.
Then they were cought out. - again.
Wow - we have us an NSA insider here! Could you publish it then and TVF will have a worldwide scoop?
-
2
-
1
-
2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
59 minutes ago, ELVIS123456 said:Dems - no no no you cant release the memo - classified - security.
WH - parts redacted - memo released
Dems - you must release our memo unredacted - classified and security dont matter this time
WH - yes they do
Incorrect - the Democrats, FBI and DOJ objected to the release of the memo, not just the Democrats.
Incorrect - the objection was that the FBI and DOJ hadn't even been able to review it. Afterwards, they reviewed it and objected to several parts.
Incorrect - the Democrats are simply asking for the same standard to be applied to both memos. They're not.
Incorrect - the WH did not care in the slightest about the classification or security consequences when they released this initial memo, hence they're not even allowing the FBI and DOJ to review it first.-
5
-
1
-
16 hours ago, Thaiwrath said:
Does it include the darts fired in go go bars ? Although they fire them at balloons, not a dartboard !
Those are licensed professionals. Just ask to see their papers...
-
6 hours ago, Dave67 said:
I'm posting more on the BKK post forums now and the Junta is getting slammed on a daily basis mainly in the opinion articles.
Yes, if only the BKK Post and Nation had the foresight and intelligence to have reported honestly and impartially when the coup took place and afterwards. They were very much all for it and were happily cheerleading for the first couple years. Now they're upset? Too bad, you've lost your right to complain as you were part of the installation of the problem.
-
1 minute ago, milwaukeeboy said:
All the people with Trump derangement syndrome on this forum need to wake up.
Trump, truth, transparency in government = good
Democrats, Republicans, DC Establishment, wars, lies = bad
So if you're a big fan of transparency in Government, you should be up for the completion of the probe. Your conjoining of the two words "Trump" and "truth" is a good one! Do his thousands of documented lies since he became the President fit in there somewhere? How?
Agree with your characterization of the current establishment and political parties. -
3 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:
Well, first of all I am a Democrat not a Republican. I was against the Courts ruling on Citizens United just as I was against their ruling on Obamacare. The government's case was ruled unconstitutional and only through the flimsiest of reasonings did Roberts pull a political move to save the legislation. I don't like that sort of thing no mattter whose party does it or who is served by it. It created a horrible situation that will end in failure. I wish Obama had had the stones to push for Single Payer, what with controlling both houses but that wouldn't have served his paymasters.
If you confused me for a Republican it is because I blame Democrats for Trump due to their undying support of thoroughly corrupt candidates. Time to clean our own house up. Stop voting for "least worst" candidates.
Ah, well, one might hope to eventually find a reasonable Republican who actually maintained their principles one day.
Completely agree with your post by the way. I think Roberts was a coward who refused to follow his own principles because he knew the political cost would be far too high. -
1 minute ago, lannarebirth said:
My brother! We are simpatico.
Good to see that there actually ARE issues where people from both sides of the debate can agree. And given the acrimony and negativity we're currently experiencing, I'd much rather start from a point of agreement than a point of difference.
I must ask though that, given your stance that you also would like big money out of politics, why it is you support the Republicans who have consistently fought to ensure big money influences politics? Citizens United was fought for by the Republicans and upheld by judges who were uniformly appointed by Republican Presidents. Shouldn't you be against the people who are completely committed to maintaining the primacy of big money in politics?
'Don't worry about the NRA,' Trump tells U.S. governors
in World News
Posted
Au contraire, mon ami! According to someone who regularly hears voices in his head, it was actually provided to Americans by God-hisownself! This is quite amazing, as I had thought it was a bunch of gentlemen in the mid- to late-1700's who wrote the document, several of whom professed to be not even particularly religious if at all. Not only that, many of these folk had come to America to escape religious persecution in Europe. So it's not really surprising that the Constitution, despite apparently being handed down on stone tablets by Yahweh, specifically and deliberately separates Church and State.
But noted historian and scholar, National Rifle Association Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre has stated that the Second Amendment was given to Americans by God as "our American birthright."
https://www.christianpost.com/news/nra-president-second-amendment-granted-by-god-americans-birthright-219018/