JCauto
-
Posts
2,007 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Posts posted by JCauto
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Traubert said:What goes through people's minds when they set off to church?
Baaaaaaa! Baaaaaaaa!
- 4
-
11 minutes ago, from the home of CC said:
definitely ironic that one of the largest religious groups in the world will be the death of millions due to worship..
I guess they will be given a cruel introduction to the "theory" of evolution. Perhaps they ought to look up the meaning of "Darwinism".
- 2
-
9 hours ago, gunderhill said:
They should just accept the death rate and carry on, instead they'll lose more through the economic crash.
Let me just guess that "you're all right Jack!" Because that's the only way you can be that callous. I thought the "free market" was supposed to reward those who are prudent and punish those that are reckless. Instead it's rewarded the opposite behaviour, using public funds to eliminate private risk and abandoning those who need help the most. A trillion dollars in money as a "reward" to those who bought politicians was used on stock buybacks less than 2 years ago. Now they need another bailout? Maybe those corporations shouldn't have eaten all that avocado toast.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, Boon Mee said:And we know why it's stalled too, don't we?
The Democrats consider their pet pork projects more important than the health of the citizens and the economy.
Oh really? So a blank cheque for $500 Billion for corporations without any oversight or reporting isn't "pet pork"?
- 6
-
5 hours ago, Nyezhov said:
Ive paid to stay in worse. Euros would view that as five stars. I cant stand it when American wimpout and whine about hotel rooms in Third World Countries, what do you think Ryan and W, that you are in Kansas? You earn in a day what your maid at the hotel earns in a month. You are in a place where there are no such things as building codes, zoning laws, consumer protection and health and saftey laws unless its made up on the spot.
.
Get a grip. Never would have won WW2 with this type of whinging.
Always find it interesting when our opinions coincide. But I am curious as to when you've come around to appreciate things such as building codes, zoning laws, consumer protection and health and safety laws? As one of the more ardent conservatives on the board (and one of the few able to make cogent arguments, whether wrong or right), how do you square this with your rabid support for the current administration and their absolute destruction of these policies? We're observing the direct result of the stripping of the USA's pandemic response capabilities and their inability to respond in a timely manner for example.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
On 3/2/2020 at 7:32 AM, Chomper Higgot said:Abortions always have happened, always will happen, the only real choice is are women allowed professional medical abortions are are they going back to coat hangers and poisons.
Exactly.
Another point which the fetus fetishists will duly ignore is that when education, birth control and safe abortions are available, the abortion rate drops precipitously.
Allow me to rephrase in a way the fetishists might understand. Making abortion illegal creates MORE abortions, not less. This is an incontrovertible fact. So do they REALLY care about abortion? If they did, then they would go for the approach that evidence has shown results in a far lower rate of abortions and far lower medical complications. But that's not the real issue.So what is really the issue? Religious or cynical men (and women) who want to control women based on their personal beliefs.
So, given the nexus between religion and the conservative political movement, do educate us liberals by answering the following question:
"If Conservatives are for freedom and less government, why are you so keen on dictating deeply personal choices and enforcing them with criminal punishment via the State?"- 4
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:Wonder if Truedeau will start whining about the extradition as the accused is Canadian?
No doubt he will. Canada doesn't have the Death Penalty, and would not send any of their citizens to a potential death sentence as a result as we think it is barbaric.
Don't feel bad though, he'd do it even for you if you were Canadian. Unfortunately, you were born in a less civilized country.- 3
- 1
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
13 hours ago, allen303 said:Obama criticized the Supreme Court at his state of the union address, for a ruling against him. With them sitting in the front row.
Plus numerous other times at news conference and interviews. Did not realize he had such a hard on for the SC till I checked it on the net!
As for the British lad, glad you take so much interest in the US politics. How is the deal going with the EU?
Indeed he did, which was quite a rare thing for someone who has as much knowledge of constitutional law and precedent. You might ask yourself, "what was this decision of the SC that was so egregious that it prompted direct public criticism from a President who seldom did so?" It was the Citizens United case, the one that opened up US politics to unlimited amounts of dark money.
This single decision is what has led to this point, where there's a serious chance that two Billionaires will be facing each other for the Presidency. Politics will never improve so long as money is what drives it. You need people to drive it, people who have been inspired by ideas. Without huge funding for politicians, you actually need to gain support from large numbers of people, not small groups of rich folk who are also able to amplify their messages infinitely with their unlimited access to the press and social media, which again is facilitated by unlimited amounts of money.
Or are you of the opinion that the rich should be given more rights since they've demonstrated their merit by accumulating large amounts of material wealth?
- 3
- 1
-
- Popular Post
12 minutes ago, Tug said:50 50 at best imo I’d rather see Biden for his experience or Bloomberg for his financial savvy I think he would do a competent job love Bernie but we can’t afford him trump has the economy going on borrowed money and giveaways to the wealthy it’s not the right time for Bernie’s ideas
Don't fall for the corporate fear-mongering. Bernie will wallop Trump in 2020. Reason #1 is the same reason Trump destroyed his Republican opposition - he's the only one who actually inspires people to get out to vote and he has a huge base of incredibly loyal voters who WILL go to the polls. This is the whole reason Hilary lost, she inspired only disgust. Not only that, the people who go to the polls for Bernie usually DON'T go to the polls, so this will be new votes on top of the anti-Trump vote. Reason #2 is that the coronavirus is going to screw the economy that was Trump's only real accomplishment other than gutting environmental, education and health care systems and stacking the Justice system with anti-abortion judges so they can further oppress women. Oh, and guess who shut down most of the US' ability to respond to pandemics? If you guessed the same guy who's telling everyone "no problem!" then you're correct. Bernie will make Trump own that and that will be the final nail in the coffin.
And why can't the US afford health care like we poorer countries have? Are they incompetent? Trump gave away $1,000,000,000,000 to the one percent and corporations and has built the deficit to levels never seen. Can you afford more of that? What would happen if the government actually walked away from massive handouts to corporations and building even more military capability and directed some of the funds to address health care, education and climate change? That's what we're talking about. If it sounds like it makes sense, that's because it does.- 7
- 4
- 1
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:Wondering how it will work for civilians working overseas not being able to have their own health Ins, or retired military on Tri-Care. Will be a mess if Bernie does pull it off.
The same way it works for us (Canadians). You buy overseas health insurance separately (Blue Cross, for example) and go home if you get something serious. Also depends on your status though, if you're an expatriate, then you don't get health care until after you've returned for 3 months to make sure that those who don't pay Canadian tax, don't get benefits. Of course, American expatriates are still subject to tax, unlike we Canucks. After all, freedom!
- 6
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
38 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:That's what you get when the Supreme Court is staffed with Afirmitive Action individuals such as Sotomeyer.
She's clearly not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice.
So you don't believe that Sonia Sotomayor's judicial record was sufficient? On what basis? She was eminently qualified based on her judicial scholarship, experience and the weight of her opinions as considered by higher courts.
Sorry to have to explain this to you, but political opinion does not either count as a qualification or as a disqualification. If you have a substantive reason (in other words, one that questions her legal expertise) why you believe this, then you should enlighten us!- 9
- 1
-
On 2/14/2020 at 3:55 AM, blazes said:
Just to take up one of your points, about "tree maintenance". I have not myself been a planter of trees, but many of my students in British Columbia spent long summers earning good money planting seedlings of pine, spruce, fir and hemlock in areas that had been clear-cut. A year later, maybe the same student would go out and inspect the condition of last year's planting. (Seedlings would, left unattended, be threatened by weeds.)
I remember one student describing his second summer's work checking for the seedling's health. He said he had to fill in his map of the planted hectares as 80% NFG. Puzzled, I had to ask him, NFG????
No fking good.Okay...so there is a certain survival rate among replanted trees, something you would expect. As I don't work in replanting, I don't know what the typical survival rates are, but I'm quite sure they're well known - this is why they were going back and measuring the survival rates. This is normal.
Do you have any other minor quibbles with my points?- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, blazes said:“Planting trees is good, of course, but it is nowhere near enough of what is needed, and it cannot replace real mitigation and rewilding nature,” Swedish teen activist Greta Thunberg said in Davos last month.
Ah, such mature wisdom out of the mouths of babes.....let's hear it for "mitigation" and "rewilding".....
As someone working in this field (forest conservation), allow me to provide my input.
Yes, Greta is correct. We are facing several crises with respect to the environment, one of which is carbon sequestration. Another, which receives far less attention, is biodiversity conservation. I would expect that they would address the carbon issue through a technological fix - think drones dropping tree seedlings rather than people with feet on the ground. And indeed, this would be a pretty good idea as trees don't require a lot of maintenance and this would be far more efficient in terms of costs and in terms of reaching remote and difficult areas to access.
On the other hand, you just end up with a large monoculture plantation forest, usually acacia or eucalyptus or some other fast-growing species (in the sub-tropics, that is). If you've ever been in any of these sorts of "forest", you'll already know how barren of life and lacking in ecological services these "forests" are.
The problem with biodiversity conservation is that once it's gone, it's not coming back and you can't artificially recreate it. This is a critical issue, but one that is very difficult to explain to laypeople. Why should you care if some exotic beetle dies in a rainforest? As we observe the start of the next great extinction event, this casual attitude to the environment ensures that Greta's generation is going to be deep in the stuff we've left for them.- 6
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, mercman24 said:this wouild have been thrown out at a proper trial, you cannot ask for witnesses after you have presented your case, this is a total farce, TRUMP has done more for the American people in 3 years than the democrats had in 8 years of doing sfa. this lot is just as bad as the LABOUR party in the UK, its a vendetta, anyone can see this, this will hurt them big time at the ballot box, serves them right, talk about clouded judgement.
You...you mean that the previous 20 impeachment trials should have been thrown out? Including Clinton's? Because they all had witnesses after impeachment in the House.
It must be difficult to ignore all the cognitive dissonance of Right-wing positions over the last three years. Before - Obama is turning the US into an imperial presidency! Now - Trump should be allowed to do anything he wants if he sees himself being re-elected as being in the best interests of the USA. Before - the spend spend spend Democrats are running up the deficit! Now - largest deficit spending in US history. Before - we're against big government and welfare! Now - increase government power by allowing the White House to ignore all rules and regulations and turn farmers into welfare queens.
Let's face it - you don't care about "rule of law", and you never have. You investigated Hilary for years and spent millions doing it and nobody was convicted, yet call this impeachment investigation a vendetta when several of the co-conspirators have already been convicted of crimes and dozens are on record including under oath to what happened, yet the Republicans refuse to allow any testimony from those directly party to the events or to allow anyone to hear the so-called "perfect" phone call. This is a cover-up which is notable only for its brazenness and lack of any attempt at coherence.
But remember - when the next Democrat President starts using these imperial powers, this is what you wanted!- 5
- 1
- 5
- 2
-
7 minutes ago, Pedrogaz said:
I tend to think that claims of anti-semitism are greatly exaggerated. Any supposed increases are due to nuanced changes of the definition of anti-semitism, to limit criticism of Israeli atrocities against Palestinians.
I lived among Jews in the US for many years and had no problems at all but I am tired of all this PR which is basically used to give Israel a free pass to continue with atrocities and land theft in Palestine.
It is time to stop looking constantly backwards to the Holocaust and to look to the future. High time for Israel to get out of Palestine and give these poor folk their territory back.
This is an example of what we are speaking about. Conflating Jews with Israel is classic Anti-Semitism. Should we be blaming Christians in general for the actions of the Lord's Army in Uganda or for the actions of other oppressive Christian-majority countries? The "I lived among Jews...had no problems" - you missed out on "I have many good Jewish friends". Again, a line you will hear from practically every Anti-Semite. The majority of Jews live outside of Israel and have never visited the place. We don't vote in Israeli elections, we don't follow Israeli politicians and we don't agree with Right-Wing governments in general (majority of non-Israeli Jews tend towards the liberal end of the political spectrum).
This "PR which is basically used to give Israel a free pass" - so it didn't exist prior to Israel and didn't substantially lead to the Holocaust? Or are you of the opinion that the Holocaust wasn't so bad?You are presumably not Jewish, so would have very little idea about experiencing Anti-Semitism, just as I would have very little idea about the day-to-day experiences of a black or transgendered person in the USA. But I certainly would not presume to doubt or denigrate their experience or dismiss it out of hand especially if I were a member of the demographic that they identify the majority of the oppression coming from.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, hansnl said:The result of antisemitism in the 20th century, 6 million murdered.
The result of Islamophobia?
No camps, no slaughters, nothing.
The result of Islam hundreds of thousand of Christians murdered, displaced, raped.
Rather a difference, I think.
Hence the reason for Islamophobia.
I think you might research into the plight of the Uighers before you claim there are no camps or other terrible things happening to Muslims. It is literally happening as we type.
And if you believe that the history of war between Christians and Muslims is a one-sided slaughter, then you've got very little knowledge of history.
- 3
-
So let me get this straight - the guy was studying for a post-graduate degree in modern Korean Literature at Kim Il Sung University in Pyongyang, then for whatever reason they decided he was being subversive, arrested him on trumped up charges, then eventually let him leave after a few weeks.
And this is something that he is being condemned for, called an idiot, and otherwise being insulted on this forum? If you were going to study modern Korean Literature, why wouldn't you go there to study if it had something of interest? I don't get it. -
On 1/12/2020 at 9:05 AM, Sticky Wicket said:
Silence from the Democrats who have been crying their little eyes out over the death of a terrorist.
170 civilians in the plane + 40 trampled at the funeral = silence
Despicable undemocrats of America
So where's the evidence of this? There's none of course, you're just following the rantings of the same people who used the same tactics to fool you into the quagmire in Iraq. Show us one (1) Democrat who is crying about the death of this guy. You can't? Didn't think so.
Now is it a valid and relevant debate to determine whether this was wise strategically or whether there was an imminent threat such that the President could go around the constitutional powers of congress? That's to be determined but is worthy of argument. But nobody from the Left is arguing that this guy was a good guy or crying now that he's dead. Scumbags are scumbags, and at least we on the Left are consistent.
For example, I'm ALL for ALL of Epstein's buddies going to jail, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, and any Hollywood actor, rich industrialist or scion of the Royal Family. I don't care where the fallout hits, just want the guilty punished regardless of their political affiliation, connections or wealth. You see, that's the thing with principles. If you stick to them, life becomes actually pretty easy to understand and you can quickly figure out what is right and what is wrong, you don't even have to know what political position the person has. Must be terribly confusing to be on the Right these days, having to parse your decades of moralistic preaching and supposed principles with supporting someone who violates each and every one on a regular basis. I think that's why Clinton was ultimately so damaging to the Democrats, they bought his BS and only afterwards realized they were compromising their core principles in doing so. That's why Hilary was unacceptable, she carried the taint with her. I really hope Bernie wins the nomination so we can see whether following your principles and being a consistent and decent person matters regardless of the political philosophy or whether it does not. -
On 1/12/2020 at 9:55 PM, Ireland32 said:
Sounds like USA bashing to me, you cannot think of another country that’s made a mistake, Ridiculous this bashing in this forum
Well, it's kind of relevant since in both cases a civilian jetliner was shot down by the military in the same region with the loss of all civilians on board. Both no doubt were tragic mistakes, and the sorts of things that happen when you have increased military tensions with civilian aircraft flying around. A similar thing happened in the Ukraine, you may recall.
I guess the difference is that the Iranians admitted that they made the error, clearly feel badly about it and apologized. This still has not happened to my knowledge with the USA shooting down the Iranian civil airliner or Russia shooting down the Malaysian airliner. Interesting about who can acknowledge and accept blame, and who cannot. -
- Popular Post
15 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:Revenge is a dish best served cold! Someone sacked from a high profile role they were clearly relishing.
Would you believe him?
No doubt those who want to hear what they expect and hope he will say will.
Thing is, on Twitter, or Fox News, or CNN for that matter, you can say "up is down" all you like, there's no consequences. However, when you testify under oath, those same statements become felony offenses.
It's interesting, isn't it, how those who testified under oath all painted the same picture and were career professionals who had everything to lose by lying. Yet those who you and others claim to be pure as driven snow offering counter-narratives all refuse in all circumstances to testify under oath, despite being lawfully subpoenaed to do so. Curious, no?- 1
- 3
- 1
-
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:Great idea. Get a fired ex employee holding a grudge to testify and call him an impartial expert witness! Would such a witness be acceptable in any normal trial? Seriously, can this farce get any more bizarre?
Okay. Then you'd of course be cool with Mulvaney, Trump and any other current WH employee testifying right? RIGHT?
There's no limit to your ability to contort your position to avoid any accountability for this administration. Just surprised you didn't call him an angry Democrat or something, as you've not cared a whit for the truth up until now. Sadly, we all know that the next time this happens to a Democrat President you'll be manning the ramparts demanding subpoenas and howling for testimony.
BTW, the best thing that could happen for your team would be Bolton testifying. A Neocon Snake with decades of experience trying to disrupt the United Nations and any other avenues of international cooperation would surely be the last person I want on the stand on national TV, especially when the supposed "jury" are coordinating the testimony with the White House.- 7
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Well, you certainly have put us in our place, Mr. Big Spender! Dropping your 3-5K per night and heading for the authentic Thai experience in Phuket! I look forward to the plethora of insight we will surely be blessed with in the coming months!
But as a humble (former) engineer, might I suggest that the primary reason for roadworks being scheduled during the tourism high season is that it also, remarkably, coincides with what we call the "dry season", which is the period during which construction becomes much easier and cheaper due to the lack of rains, flooding and other such bothersome things? I know for someone who rides a chariot of gold between Hi-So venues whilst dispensing pearls of wisdom before us swine that this seems such a minor inconvenience, but, well, it's "technical".
So as you spend your time dispensing shekels amongst the denizens of Loy Kroh bars, I would certainly not be one to discount your learned experience as you will surely be spending most of your time conversing with ladies (or lads, one must not make too many assumptions these days) who come from primarily rural backgrounds so you'll have your finger on the pulse of the nation. Of course, I only speak of your evening gambols, no doubt you're communing with the rich and powerful during the day, making deals, helping bring the noble savages the benefit of your incredible knowledge and expertise, etc.
As one of your peers (oh, sorry, how dare I - I meant "as someone who also lived 8 years or so in Thailand in total), I really look forward to seeing what I missed out on and learning how dumb I am. Sure, I may speak, read and write Thai and have worked in the region for 30 years, but what an idiot I must be compared to your excellency. I beseech you to provide me the glorious benefit of your immense wisdom.- 8
- 3
- 3
-
On 1/1/2020 at 5:35 PM, TopDeadSenter said:
What, like the panel of triggered leftist academics that they wheeled out as witnesses for the house trial?
If team dem have any sense at all, they will drop this hilarious farce like a hot potato and start considering how best to find a half sane candidate to run against The Donald.
So you're discounting all the other witnesses except for that one single day where they wheeled out three academics (one of whom you may recall was chosen by the Republicans - why did they choose a Leftist academic, bit stupid of them, no?).
So how about all the State Department employees, Ambassador Sondland (appointed by Trump), etc.?
Seriously, you must be hungover today to post such a poor attempt at obfuscation, I've come to expect better of you. Disappointing. -
43 minutes ago, alex8912 said:
I bet most of us have not had Dengue. I know of none. Have you ever heard of mosquito spray? There is organic as well. They both work fine.
Well, I was referring to my peers, those who have been working in rural development in Southeast Asia over 30 years or so although many I know who got it have been here a shorter time than I. We're probably a lot more exposed, so to speak.
Mozzie spray is not 100% protection, whereas the tiny buggers here can't get through a thin layer of clothes, never mind my cotton socks and blue jeans. In Canada, you'd have to wear kevlar clothes to gain the same effect.
Trump says WHO is China-centric, 'really blew it' on coronavirus
in World News
Posted
I agree with your assessment of WHO - like many UN agencies they've become ossified and beset by nepotism and corruption. But they were never particularly effective even prior to those natural processes occurring. Surely those who support Trump have been of the opinion forever that the UN are utterly useless. Hence why should their advice matter in the slightest?
I do have a strong dislike of Donald Trump, but I'd hardly call it irrational. I believe in science, competency, transparency and cooperation, and none of those things are supported by the Donald. So I would prefer if you would call it like it is - many people have a strongly justified dislike of Donald Trump.
Now let me ask you something - do you think that the WHO has any power over decision-making at national level? Do you think that the Trump administration takes note of UN decisions and advice prior to making their choices? Do you think that national governments bear responsibility for what happens within their borders or do you think the UN does?