soalbundy

No.

I wish I could care more. He broke the law and got arrested. Tip, how to avoid such an experience......don't break the law.

It was that damn tailor again.

Maybe she deserved it, imagine what ar$eholes men would be if they thought they could insult people without consequences but because they don't have a vagina they get a punch on the nose, that is considered OK, some Karens get a slap to remind them not to cross certain lines. This incident didn't happen because of a price dispute. We don't know what happened but she probably used the card 'I'm a girl you can't hurt me so I can say what I want'.....it didn't work out that way for her and now all she has is an injured ego.

Violence isn't always physical, there are Karens who think using verbal violence has no consequences because they have a vagina, it doesn't always work out that way.

We don't know that because we weren't there, we don't know what was said, she must have crossed a line, this wasn't just a disagreement about price.

All this outrage, does being aggressive make him less of a tailor? So he slapped a woman, did the world end? Consider that nor every arse kicking just falls out of the sky, there's a story behind every reaction, he had a bad day and she probably crossed a line so now you get faux outrage to prove how woke you are and while you're at it lets ruin every Indian tailor because you had a bad experience with one,

Reminds of a stand up show by the American comedian Bill Burr :- "Then they come on and say, there is no reason to hit a woman" "Really!, the amount of ego in that statement, are you levitating above the rest of us, are you never annoying? I can give you 17 reasons off the top of my head, you can wake me from a drunken stupour and I can give you 9....you don't do it but to say there is no reason makes no sense."

I've made it clear that I don't think either of them should be prosecuted, the state is playing the 'moral police' card which causes pimps to come out of the wood work to get customers for her for a large fee, other crimes follow from that, every time the state interferes unforeseen consequences follow, people don't want to be controlled. Why should a man be prosecuted for following his natural urges if it harms nobody.

Why should anyone be prosecuted for having natural urges or to want to profit from them. What right does anyone have to say a women can't sell her sexuality, you aren't being forced to buy her. A man's desire is private, the state shouldn't be interfering with his natural urges, he is paying for sex for reasons that don't concern the state. The law doesn't stop prostitution it drives it underground where the state can't control the health issues or profit from taxation. It will end like prohibition.....stopping people from drinking alcohol, that caused the mafia.

What actions would they be? You are going to give a hypocritical woke answer that makes no sense aren't you......mostly life is easier when you accept the world as it is, platitudes are hideous little lies. Even women find male feminists a little creepy.

Oh isn't that a little strict? Men's brains are 24/7 do it, do it, do it. Womens brains are, what do I get out of it? so we meet in the middle with some crispy bank notes, she pretends to enjoy the process and you end up feeling somehow cheated by the comedy but you did it. A British police superintendent once said a brothel is as essential to a city as a sewage works.

The circumvented law against prostitution, it is promoting prostitution but since nothing can be proved nothing is done about it. I find it hypocritical to prosecute someone for providing rooms when everyone knows the bar girl is going to a room somewhere else, the paid sex still takes place, the bar owner takes his cut and is now a legal pimp without consequences. Just legalize the whole thing with taxation and health care plus regular testing for STD's. How it is now is just a charade.

You've obviously misunderstood me, no, it is not illegal according to the letter of the law, I thought I had made that plain. As far as I'm concerned there is only a thin line dividing brothels and bar beers, I personally have nothing against either, I have never been in a brothel but have spent many hilarious hours in bars and enjoyed the experience. I've never paid a bar fine, I always arranged a meeting place with a woman the next day in the early afternoon, it always went well.

Instagram shorthand for what?

Not according to the letter of the law but the bar fine is like a brothel fee, and the 'staff' are prostitutes so let's keep it real and see it as it is. If the shagging took place on the premises it would be breaking the law, the fact that it doesn't circumvents the law, that's the only difference to a fully blown brothel.

It's not the drinking that's illegal, it's the bar girl prostitutes and bar fines that makes them a 'take away brothel', the food is consumed elsewhere, that's the small difference. Whatever, I see no harm in either 'institution' as long as it's a case of legal age consensual pussy prying.

He fell asleep after he shot his bolt......sorry, I'll get my coat now.

I agree, I've been here 20 years, I have a 16 year old son, 2 step daughters and a load of step grand children but I'm not a local. I'm used to everything, it doesn't feel strange or foreign it feels like home but I'm a falang even if my step daughters and grand kids don't see it like that, I'm just papa. I've lived and worked in several countries and always felt at home wherever I hung my hat. The author Heinrich Boell once wrote, "On your first day in a strange country, buy something, that way you take possession of the city." I've found that to be true.

I used to drink Leo but one evening my wife brought me a Singha, since then I've gone off Leo and now only drink Singha.

Not love, just possession and a hurt ego.

I agree, I have glasses because I am short and far sighted. My eye doctor in Germany had his own small clinic and could perform laser surgery (3,000 Euro per eye) but even though he offered this possibility he said I wouldn't do this surgery on my wife as the long term affects are unknown (this was 25 years ago). I've worn glasses since then.

What's the difference between that and a bar beer except for the mattresses.

National security is the least of the worries of the general public who are contending with lower standards of living, inflation, rent increases, the breakdown of law and order, personal debt etc. Nobody feels personally threatened by China, Russia or Iran but do feel threatened by potential homelessness, unemployment and street violence.

It really is time that heavy financial penalties, or even custodian sentences, were given for such crimes and yes they are crimes. There are just no consequences for such irresponsible behaviour.