thesetat

That is for martial law... Not for war...

i can understand air purifiers. But why vacuum cleaners?

They should have piss tested him. His actions seem unprovoked as well as erratic.

Wish i was there to see it.. i have not seen a good cat fight in a long time.

You misunderstood... the man was drinking with the Ex when his gf walked up to them and began making a problem

As i see it... both are dictators in your sense of the word..

It was a campaign promise. Very few of his campaign promises have failed. But you can not blame him as at least he is trying to stop it. Biden just wanted to supply more and more and more weapons and money to keep it going.

Zelenski and his government made and passed that law this year. Duh!! Not Fox propaganda. https://www.jurist.org/news/2025/02/ukraine-parliament-affirms-no-elections-during-wartime-under-martial-law/

perhaps Jingthing does

Why would you suggest that... blaming others? I should blame myself? Really?

So what you are saying is that, if any country gets into a war. US citizens should flip the bill and pay for it. With no hope of getting any kind of return in it either economically or politically. If so, there are lots of other small wars the US can pay for with the same hope of not getting any kind of return. Negotiations did not happen because of Zelenski's refusal and i believe i read Russia had a previous warrant about not being allowed near Zelenski. Not certain about that part though I do recall reading it when their first meeting to negotiate a deal failed to happen. The fact is though. If Zelenski refused to make a pact with the US. If Zelenski should not even be their leader still because of cancelled elections. Why should the US support them? What hope is there of a concession? What hope is there of a deal when Zelenski is unwilling to negotiate any kind of deals? I really do not understand why this is so hard to digest? Russia is continuing what they began and will not stop. Eventually, Russia will win. But at what cost is this to the US? Only the monetary loss and losing their assets that could have been negotiated as a plan to keep American interests in protecting their country. Would you supply your money to the loser knowing that when it was all finished you gained nothing? Do you throw your money out on the streets for anyone to take?

You have your point of view on this... I have mine. Neither is accurate. Neither is better. But, the US has not been a real democracy for a long time. Not since before Trump first became president.

As i know it... they did not happen also. But for good reasons. Mostly they did not happen because of Zelenski himself.

It sure as heck was not a democracy before Trump.

The negotiations are over. Zelenski had a chance to ally with US by signing a deal with them. They instead turned the meeting into a farce and getting thrown out of the WH. Up to now those negotiations have not ceded anything. So why, would the US protect the Ukraine if there is no vested interest or benefit to the US?

again... where is your proof of propaganda? Seems you make more propaganda with your posts than Russia or Trump combined.

Only you said the word surrender.. Zelenski is not even willing to negotiate a peace deal. I said nothing about surrendering.

Zelenski should not even be their leader anymore. He used the war as an excuse to cancel elections so he could maintain power in his country. As soon as the war is ended, his position in government will end also.

Then why would Zelenski say the opposite until Trump threw him out of the WH? What proof do you have about Trump cutting deals with Russia? Show some links to this. Otherwise you are making this up in your head.

I hope the Dems chew on this OP a lot. Their fight with deporting the illegals is completely unfounded. Trumps policy for getting the illegals out is working. It has also impacted the amount of illegals trying to enter still. How can Americans feel safe knowing the guy next door could be a terrorist or killer or foreign gang member? The courts need to stop taking cases if proof is shown the person has entered the country illegally.

The US had better do something to counter the threat of attack. Drones are the future of repelling and attacking an enemy. As seen in the recent wars they are quite effective and cheap to use. Currently the US can not even identify drones as seen with all of those drones on the East Coast a few months ago. They do however have technology to down drones but that just means making them lose power and dropping their arsenal on whatever they crash on.

This is pretty clear he does not want to end the war. The US should not support a country for an ongoing war that no-one wants to see ended. It is a waste of tax-payers money. Nothing is gained from giving them free money and supplies when all they do is maintain the front and nothing is given in return for the money spent on them.

I am surprised they waited so long to print this story. What also surprises me is that the government did not expect travel to be reduced when China decided to make the tariff war. Jobs are unstable now, people are worried about spending because they do not know if their incomes will change with the tariffs. Then there is also the fear factor. The Thai government tried their best to show China how safe Thailand is with promises they can not keep. All in all, I think tourism will be reduced for some time until this tariff war ends. Thailand may need to focus more on producing quality products to keep their GDP at a steady level. .

I thought that your child would be use an extension of your visa?

You forgot to add commit crimes, live on welfare, get American taxpayer money to support them. as well as medical costs and anything else they need.