Why does so many new media exaggerate?
"Plane fell almost 2,000 meter in a few minutes"
Apparently it didn't fell, the captain took it down after the turbulent incident and the "fall" is not worse than what they decline before landing. The captain most certainly did this on purpose to be able to fly much slower than in an air space (FIR) dedicated for traffic on high altitudes. He can fly slower to prevent injured passengers to get more injuries if he fly closer to the ground.
"The plane was forced to do an emergency landing in Bangkok"
I would say No, the emergency landing was a choice of the captain. Im sure no one forced him. He landed on the closest airport he believe can treat the injured people as soon as possible.
"The turbulence killed one person"
They believe he died from a heart attack, not caused by trauma, but the autopsy has to verify that, that probably would mean he had some heart conditions and he might not even be aware of them, Hypertension? The incident is most certain why caused the bowl of water to overflow with the last drop.
"2 people died from the Turbulence"
So far I have not seen any reliable source mention a second fatality. Only one that some media seams to refer to. They might be wrong, and I hope they are, one dead in one to many already.
and the most crazy one:
"One died of emergency landing from not wearing seat belt"
Why state this?
Im sure there is many more examples. Many media seams for example to focus on the oxygen masks that fall down on hight altitude if the cabin pressure disappear, in this case they probably can down when a passenger without seat belt hit the panel with their head.