Rigby40

For the last 20 years he's not used to seeing bombs anywhere outside of the box office ????

Gun free zones, like the one they were in, are safe spaces for killers.

I hate to say it but I'm with you guys on this one. This truly enraged me to hear Trump say that.

What an insult to dogs!

To quote one CNN contributer Van Jones:

"The Russia thing is just a big nothing burger"

14 hours ago, bristolboy said:

But you did mean to deflect from the subject of the thread.

And now you're trying to deflect by trolling. 

You're in a rut.

yes you're so right, I'm in a total rut here.

The uncuckening begins. Joy! ?

14 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

The thread is about Trump's meeting with Sulzberger and Trump's honesty or lack thereof.

What does Maxine Waters have to do with that? 

Didn't mean to hurt your fee fees. Sorry.

9 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

So now it's but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but Maxine.

But Maxine what?  I just think it would be a fair trade if we're going to start putting cones on people.

1 hour ago, mtls2005 said:

Clearly "off-the-record", which the White House insisted upon prior to this meeting, means something different to Trump?

 

Now, a clearly brighter person, Sulzberger, is free to share all the details of the meeting.

 

 

Trump’s battle with the New York Times and A.G. Sulzberger, explained

 

The latest chapter of Donald Trump versus the media unfolded over the weekend in the form of a back-and-forth between the president and the New York Times. The subject: an off-the-record meeting between Trump and the Times’s publisher, A.G. Sulzberger, that the president put on the record with a tweet.

 

On Sunday morning, Trump tweeted that he’d had a “very good and interesting meeting” at the White House with Sulzberger. He said they talked about the “vast amounts of Fake News being put out with the media” and again referred to the press as the “enemy of the people.”

 

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/7/30/17630298/trump-tweet-new-york-times-sulzberger

 

 

 

Not gonna lie, that's a pretty funny illustration.

We'll agree to put a couple of those around his arms but we also get to put a cone around Maxine Waters head ?

4 minutes ago, utalkin2me said:

The ones I see laughing their asses off are professional political analysts. There is not a single doubt left, this is the biggest joke of a president the united states has ever seen. The guy tweets like a 12 year old, what more needs to be said really? 

I could care less what professional political analysts think.

It's about time we had someone with stones in the white house. I'm absolutely loving it!

15 minutes ago, Ramen087 said:

Yup, they've now jumped on the mental illness bandwagon to deflect, protect and obstruct the perpetrators of these religious based perpetrators of injurious and many times murderous hate crimes. And some people in the general population still are falling for it. Amazing.

Agreed. I was the same way though years ago, just absolutely terrified by reality I just couldn't accept it. Eventually the cognitive dissonance become too much.

43 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

And your assumption that if someone has a name that indicates they might be a Muslim, therefore if they commit a crime of violence it's because of their Muslim beliefs, continues to be self-evidently nonsensical.

Usually the case.

4 minutes ago, Credo said:

As far as Trump goes, if you are dark, you aren't welcome.   If you are, as he said, Norwegian, then you are welcome.   

More baseless nonsense, just as expected time and time again.

As a mixed hispanic myself, you have to know we were laughing our a**es off at all the holier-than-thou white people running around telling us how if Trump became president he was going to deport us and kill the homosexuals ?All my brown family members are still here, even my grandmother who can't speak English who you'd think would be first to go ?

1 hour ago, zaphod reborn said:

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." 

Another failure to deliver any evidence on how Trump hates brown people, not surprised.

You are aware that there are plenty of white Mexicans right? This might come as another shocker to you, but some are white with blue eyes. ?

3 hours ago, bristolboy said:

So you have evidence that Hussein committed this act because of his Muslim beliefs? Or is it just a case of Pavlovian thinking on your part: Arabic name therefore a Muslim therefore a murderer because of Muslim beliefs. 

Usually the case. I know I know, Islam is a peaceful religion and it could never ever ever be the motivation blah blah blah

You'd think it would be in their favor to find and release information on a link between the shooter and Islamic State. It actually looks much worse for Muslims this way because it just goes to show you they don't need to be apart of a terrorist group, they'll take it upon themselves to kill people based on their religious texts. Random unaffiliated Muslims are perfectly capable and willing to commit these acts for allah.

Just now, bristolboy said:

And I bet you'll forget it when he doesn't.

No, unlike the anti-trumpers I can admit when I'm wrong, avoid doubling down and walk my *** back to the drawing board.

6 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Yes, it gave her a little worse than a 3 out of 4 chance. I suspect it's too late to educate you about what probability means. But let me try. If I tell you that your prediction that a coin toss coming up 2 heads in a has a 1 out of 4 chance of happening, and it happens, does that mean my understanding of probability is incorrect? And tell me, if someone challenged you to 1 round of Russian Roulette with a gun containing 3 bullets out of 4 chambers, would you count on  empty chamber coming through for you?

Thanks for schooling me.

I'm sure I'll remember this little conversation when he wins again against their predictions in 2020 ?