johng

Because they won the war and the spoils of war go to the victor.

When the mostly cheapo Chinese chargers go wrong yes, high voltage does out instead of 5v DC I believe this is due to the mini transformer windings being shoddy the insulation breaks down and allows the high voltage straight through !

Save lives by ending the war not by petitioning the SCOTUS to continue it !

Maybe there is a purple haired shemale saboteur at the launchpad ?

Rumble,Bitchute and Odysee are much needed alternatives to the sadly compromised Youtube now tied into Google and the "security apparatus". long live the alternative free speech platforms

They now have no choice but to except whatever Russia offers.

How would I know ? how would Zelensky know? neither of us have talked to the Russians.

Attack what ? in your above scenario he has achieved his aims.

Couldn't agree more.

Yet another CIA operation production then switched to Afghanistan.

If so he was "negotiating" with the wrong party and at the wrong moment, he was there to sign a mineral deal in payback of the billions that USA has sent to prop his country up in a proxy war that according to Lindsey Graham was the best money we have ever spent, the purpose to weaken Russia and provoke regime change with no US casualties only Ukrainian and Russian casualties. (yes quite sickening ) He should have taken the offer from Russia near the start of the conflict but instead decided to listen to Boris Johnson and Co and take on the largest country in the world !!!

Because they thought they would get "protection" from big daddy America on the cheap + it is also cheaper to share the costs over many different countries so it does make sense to join the club..until you figure in the antagonising Russia bit which I don't think they thought about at all until recently. There are probably other behind closed doors incentives like maybe intelligence sharing and pathway to EU membership trade deals etc etc

If they don't sign agreements with Russia who are they going to sign with ? basically he is saying there is no way to stop the war without the total defeat/capitulation of Russia...not gonna happen is it ?

The objective is not to "save democracy" ?? seems the objective has changed, well not really because you are right the objective from the start was to mess with Russia with absolutely no care about the lost lives of Ukrainian citizens or the infrastructure and economy of Ukraine as well as trying to keep natural resources away from Russia which has failed cos they took the eastern 20% of the country. Strange how I was called a Putin apologist for stating this not very long ago.

Ohh and the only thing the US cares about Taiwan is the chip manufacturing plants...there was even talk of bombing them if China "invades" so as not to let them fall into "ememy" hands ! Oddly enough the largest plant TSMC has recently announced a 100 billion dollar investment to build a chip plant in the US. https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3210

Though they often act as if they are...when it suits them.

No I think it is EU and to lesser degree US that have been "disarmed" by sending "all their inventory" to Ukraine ... yes yes old stock outdated models yada yada yada the point is they are out of ammo and there is no capacity at the moment to replace it and also no persons to fill the "boots on the ground" "peacekeeping force" which would not in fact be a peacekeeping force as Russia has said they won't accept that so it will be WWIII

Wow I'm getting very old !!!

They did jointly start this particular phase of the war by provoking Russia since 2014 Maidan coup continual shelling of the eastern Russian speaking regions and talk of joining NATO and then just as an agreement was in hand in the early stages of the Russian "invasion" "Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson" and Co persuades Zelinsky to fight to the last Ukrainian...we have your back...yeah right !!!!!! Viva la peace and prosperity Just say say no to war.

You know a large percentage of Polio cases these days are actually from taking the live vaccine..though I think it is not used in the USA any longer.. quote below from that "trusted media source" Wikipedia The primary disadvantage of OPV derives from its inherent nature. As an attenuated but active virus, it can induce vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) in roughly one individual per every 2.7 million doses administered.[23] The live virus can circulate in under-vaccinated populations (termed either variant poliovirus or circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus, cVDPV), and over time can revert to a neurovirulent form causing paralytic polio.[23] This genetic reversal of the pathogen to a virulent form takes a considerable time and does not affect the person who was originally vaccinated. With wild polio cases at record lows, 2017 was the first year where more cases of cVDPV were recorded than the wild poliovirus.[24] Until recent times, a trivalent OPV containing all three viral strains was used, and had nearly eradicated polio infection worldwide.[25] With the complete eradication of wild poliovirus type 2[26] this was phased out in 2016 and replaced with bivalent vaccine containing just types 1 and 3, supplemented with monovalent type 2 OPV in regions where cVDPV type 2 was known to circulate.[23] The switch to the bivalent vaccine and associated missing immunity against type 2 strains, among other factors, led to outbreaks of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2), which increased from two cases in 2016 to 1037 cases in 2020.[27] A novel OPV2 vaccine (nOPV2), which has been genetically modified to reduce the likelihood of disease-causing activating mutations, was granted emergency licencing in 2021, and subsequently full licensure in December 2023.[28] This has greater genetic stability than the traditional oral vaccine and is less likely to revert to a virulent form.[29][9] Genetically stabilised vaccines targeting poliovirus types 1 and 3 are in development, with the intention that these will eventually completely replace the Sabin vaccines.[30]

I think he believes that yes, and there is strong circumstantial evidence but for now he has to try and get the studies done showing the proof and that will take time so yes again he is biding time..I hope the studies get done in a timely robust and transparent manner..certainly will be interesting to see the results.

They live at home due to the ludicrous price of housing, they simply can't afford to move out.

Nope don't agree with that it would totally stifle debate and any semblance of free speech that already teeters on the precipice .