candide

Ok, if you wish, only those who assaulted the Capitol. The rest if your post is the usual conspiracy theory deflection! 😀 It's not what has been shown in the Jan.6 rioters trials.

B.S. (except the fact that Trump supporters are dumb! You said it! 😀)

Deflection and lame false equivalence. She did not call protesters to march to the Capitol during election certification.

Lol! Where is it written in this interview transcript that "Trump offered Pelosi National Guard...she turned it down."?

Please show the quote confirming that Pelosi refused a national guard offer by Trump. I did not find it.

Sorry, I was not precise enough. He sent them to the Capitol after telling them to fight like hell, during a protest called "stop the steal" , and then by themselves, they decided to assault the Capitol. They may have thought that stopping the election certification was like stopping the steal. And when they assaulted the Capitol, Trump did nothing to stop them during hours. He never told them: no no, you misunderstand me, stop it at once! 😀 As to your question : that's what the Jan. 6 rioters trial has showed ( that their were Trump supporters).

So she did not send her supporters to assault the Capitol. Thank you again for acknowledging this difference. It can be discussed forever whether the Russian interference had enough impact or not to change election results. However it is fact that there had been Russian interference.

This is a lie.

Thank for highlighting the difference between 2016 and 2020. In 2016, Hillary did not claim there had been massive fraud, did not organise a protest and id not send her supporters to the Capitol, and they did not assault it in order to steal the election. Some people protested and burned Trump's head, as during a Carnival. In 2020, Trump claimed there had been massive fraud, organised a protest and sent them to the Capitol, and they assaulted the Capitol in order to overturn the election. Oh, sorry, wi forgot to mention the similarities! After the 2026 election, Trump claimed there had been massive fraud! 😀

Pattaya, what a reference! 😀

In brief, you have nothing. FD-1023 anyone?

But this poster stated there are no facts, only opinions! 😀

You know, the one in which rioters have been convicted.

B.S.! All witnesses (you know, in front of the GOP Committee) have stated under oath that Joe was not involved in Hunter's business and that business subjects have not been discussed with Joe during these dinner! As to your lame false equivalence, Trump's Phone call wascrecordedvand there was no doubt about its content. 😀

That's in the testimony you mentioned.

No. The stated fact is that he popped in during 5/10 mn to say hello.

In your alternate universe only. That's not what evidence presented in court is showing.

They assaulted the Capitol in order to block the process of certification and bypass the legitimate electors vote. I call it trying to steal the election. How would you rather call it?

Sorry to spoil your fantasy, but no need for tissues. 😀 Trump winning the primaries Is good news, as Haley was more likely to win the election. https://www.racetothewh.com/president/polls

The summer of love is out-of topic. Moreover, they did not assault the Capitol in order to steal elections, so the comparison is irrelevant.

Anyway, what has summer of love to do with the current thread topic?

Facts from testimonies by Trump's aides. Facts you are not able to contradict 😀

I have given facts, not opinions, about Jan. 6, which you did not contradict. If you want to talk about the so-called summer of love, why don't you open a thread about it?

Another lame deflection. 😀 Trumpers are so funny. They cannot defend Trump by contradicting assertions, so it's always but, but... BLM, summer of love, or whatever false equivalence they may think of ( or rather, have been fed with).

Deflecting again. 😀 So what was not true in the quote? What was not true in the Reuters news, too?