candide

Well, if his testimony confirms what the NYPost wrote about it (the article cited as the source of the DM article), you may be disappointed. Quote: "VP Biden greeted the Ukrainians but spoke only in vague pleasantries during the short call, and in other such interactions with Hunter’s overseas business partners, Archer is expected to testify." https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/hunter-biden-put-then-vp-dad-joe-on-the-phone-with-business-associates-at-least-2-dozen-times-ex-partner-devon-archer-to-testify/

Supporting evidence of what, exactly?

That was a sarcastic statement, as I understand it.

Comer says! ????

McCarthy edges back from the brink of a Biden impeachment inquiry https://news.yahoo.com/mccarthy-edges-back-brink-biden-201517982.html

Well , Germany is the lowest and we know why. UK is the second lowest and we also know why. As to the FT article, it is based on outdated data. According to the latest data available, the current level of UK GDP is below pre-pandemic level. You can check here (updated 25 July) https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn02784/#:~:text=In Q1 2023%2C the UK,0.5% fall in Q4 2022. And also here https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp

From the linked article: "The UK is still expected to be the second slowest growing nation in the G7 group of leading economies this year" The good news is also that UK may finally catch-up the pre-pandemic level at the end of this year! ????

Because they are not as obsessed by Hunter Biden as you are?

"And so I had to write this incandescently stupid memo called something like, 'Afghanistan, How to Put America First and Win.' And then bullet by bullet, I summed up this highly classified memo into Trump's sort of bombastic language because it was the only way he was gonna understand," Taylor added. "I mean, I literally said in there, 'You know, if we leave Afghanistan too fast, the terrorists will call us losers. But if we wanna be seen as winners, we need to make sure the Afghan forces have the strength to push back against these criminals.' I mean, it was that dumb and that's how you had to talk to him." ???? https://news.yahoo.com/incandescently-stupid-former-dhs-official-145845005.html

McCarthy edges back from the brink of a Biden impeachment inquiry https://news.yahoo.com/mccarthy-edges-back-brink-biden-201517982.html

He's desperate! ????

Sweetheart deal! Lol! That's only your biased interpretation. The fact that Hunter Biden's attorney refused the new deal and advised his client to plead not guilty is surely not an indicator that the final outcome will be worse than the initial deal. From the article you linked: "Both sides had motivation to reach an agreement. For Hunter Biden, this was a chance to close the books on a tax investigation that has been hanging over him for years. For prosecutors, the deal avoided the risks of trying a case in Biden-friendly Delaware, against a defendant who failed to file taxes while in the throes of addiction. "

Ok. There have been money transfers (actually they were known before the WB mentioned them). Then It's a matter of "if": if this money was related to something illegal (no evidence of it yet), and if Joe was involved (also no evidence of it) in these activities (about which there is yet no evidence of illegality).

Hunter. The WB doesn't claim Joe received money. So It's irrelevant for claiming Joe should be impeached, as you did.

The WB claims concern an alleged covering up by the DOJ. The whistleblower you mentioned did not claim to have evidence against Joe. And most of the alleged covering-up occurred under Trump. Impeach Barr!

Money was transferred. Ok. Emails explain it was about fees and expenses related to the project of creating a JV (which would, for example, have invested in a liquefied gas unit in the U.S.). What's illegal about it? What has Joe to do with it? You have nothing!

Comer said it! That's your evidence?

Well, he could just have said that it is not comparable, or that both cases were bad. He said what he said (probably partly by stupidity). To re-use one of your previous forms of argument, it is obvious that former slaves were able to use what they have been forced to learn as slave. They why was it stressed (see Bkk Brian post before)? If not for suggesting that, after all, slavery was not that bad.

The main claims of the whistleblowers (if true) are about events which occurred during Trump's mandate (they were alegedly prevented to investigate Hunter further, interview his children, etc...). How can it be a ground to impeach Joe?

And the fact that he disagreed with both Barr's DOJ and Garland's DOJ suggests he's of a 'disagreeing' type.

Come on! It's only because they like Fox News! ???? (Sarcasm alert)

As usual, the context is important Gutfeld made a comparison between black people alegedly benefiting from slavery (sic), and concentration camps. He was replying to (quote from the OP): "Jessica Tarlov, a panelist on “The Five” who is Jewish, said she was “uncomfortable” with the implication that some Black people benefited from slavery and asked whether one could make a similar argument about Jews who were imprisoned at concentration camps during World War II, when Adolf Hitler’s genocidal regime murdered about 6 million Jews and also targeted Romany people, homosexuals and political dissidents." And....he did!

Changing target now?

Why didn't you tell it to your pal SunnyinBangrak in the first place?

Come on! Not that false equivalence B.S. again! The Dems never claimed there had been massive fraud, did not assault the Capitol, did not refuse to certify elections, etc... Calling Trump illegitimate because he is notably incompetent is quite a different thing.