candide

No the defense is "you've still got nothing", and on top of it, it's ridiculous!

He was a government official dealing with SA. I'm not saying it's necessarily corrupt but there's a clear conflict of interest, and conflicts of interest should be investigated by House committees. As to Hunter, as far as I know, his business is also legitimate.

How Did Jared Kushner Get $2 Billion From the Saudis? Hint: It’s not because of his track record as an investor. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-04-11/how-did-jared-kushner-get-2-billion-from-the-saudis Not saying it's corrupt but it seems to me it's the right price at WH level. Not a few miserable millions. Of course, when a government official receives billions of $ from a foreign country, the House committee looks elsewhere. Better look at a private citizen with no record of any transaction with the government (Hunter).

The deal is indicated in the laptop documents you seem to trust. It was about the creation of a JV. Nothing illegal in creating a JV with a Chinese company, as 1000s of companies did. According to Hunter's lawyer, the money was about consulting fees and various cost to prepare the deal. But if you have evidence that it was illegal please give us your evidence.

No involvement needed to make a threat. I'll tell my father! It' been working since kindergarten.... On top of it, there is no evidence that there was anything illegal with this 'deal'.

1. You mean when Hunter paid for some house repairs? What a shocking case of corruption! ???? Not to mention that Joe paid him back.! 2. So Hunter made a threat to someone who owned him money, while his father held no official position (in 2017) and Trump was President! Another shocking case of corruption! ???? In brief, you have nothing!

What has he done wrong, exactly?

From your link: "Shapley testified that he, in October 2020, complained that he still had "not been given access to the laptop." Shapley noted that Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf admitted that she did not see the laptop because "prosecutors decided to keep it from the investigators." It's really shocking to see how Biden's weaponized DOJ was able to restrict the scopa of this investigation! Oh wait! It was on October 2020! ????

From the linked article: "He said some of the decisions made in the case "seem to be influenced by politics," citing an example of DOJ officials having supposedly "dragged their feet" over a request for physical search warrants of addresses in California, Arkansas, New York, and Washington, D.C., in March 2020." So in March 2020, Trump 's DOJ interfered in the investigation, in order to protect Hunter Biden..... Ahem! That's a bit incredible, isn't it?

Trumps reply ???? “The Deranged Special Prosecutor, Jack Smith, working in conjunction with the DOJ & FBI, illegally leaked and ‘spun’ a tape and transcript of me which is actually an exoneration, rather than what they would have you believe,” Trump wrote. https://news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-responds-leaked-audio-025702780.html

Considering that a large share of MAGA folks not only believe in the Big Lie conspiracy, but also believe in the pizzagate and birther conspiracies (among others), how would you call these morons?

Millions of $ may look like an important sum to you, but It's peanuts for consulting and law firms. Moreover, it would be a ridiculously low price to corrupt someone at the WH level. As Trump and Kushner examples with Saudi Arabia and Qatar have shown, the price of corruption at the WH level is in billions of $, not millions.

Come on! Haven't you watched "Back to the Future"? ???? Same story with the so-called IRS whistleblowers. Most events brought up occurred in 2020.

The same fake elections B.S. claims by the sore liar looser.

Exactly. Trump refused to testify! Trump will not testify or provide any statement at impeachment trial, lawyer says https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/impeachment-managers-request-trump-testify-under-oath-senate-trial-n1256751

Which lies?

Only in your alternate universe..... https://www.racetothewh.com/

A significant detail seems to have been forgotten.... According to the OP, the alleged interference events occurred in 2020, under the Trump administration. How could the Biden administration have interfered with an investigation before the start of Biden's mandate?

As I wrote in my post, after the current senators term expire, according to the current constitution (which cannot be amended without at least one third of Senate vote), the new senators will be selected by committees, the members of these committees being selected by the EC.. That's how it has been designed: appointed people appoint each other, without leaving the opportunity for elected people to interfere in the process. So the new Senate will likely be controlled by the yellow/green establishment.

More fun! I just can't get enough! ???? Trump Melts Down as DOJ Turns Over Evidence It Plans to Use Against Him https://news.yahoo.com/trump-melts-down-doj-turns-133854634.html A few quotes: “CONGRESS, PLEASE INVESTIGATE THE POLITICAL WITCH HUNTS AGAINST ME CURRENTLY BEING BROUGHT BY THE CORRUPT DOJ AND FBI, WHO ARE TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL,” Trump wrote Thursday morning. ???? “Congress will hopefully now look at the ever continuing Witch Hunts and ELECTION INTERFERENCE against me on perfectly legal Boxes, where I have no doubt that information is being secretly ‘planted’ by the scoundrels in charge,” ???? He knows he's toast!

Sorry but it won't happen. In order to amend the Constitution, it is required to have the agreement of at least one third of the Senate and at least 20% of MPs from each political party. https://prachataienglish.com/node/9086 So the next Senate will be selected by committees and panels (in which representatives of agencies will hold the majority of votes). Who will select these committees? The EC, which has been selected by the NCPO.

Never.

There are facts in the two articles linked. If you disagree with the reality of the facts mentioned, feel free to indicate which ones. There are also plenty of other references available, such as: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/08/manchin-family-coal-company-00003218 Moreover, his wife is also mentioned: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/manchin-wife-broke-conflicts-of-interest-ethics-pledge-emails

It's not a conspiracy theory, It's the observation that he always acted/voted in a way to helped his own business. There is an obvious conflict of interest there.

You are placating again your own interpretation on what other posters write. It's not what was meant, as the reply from the poster shows.