candide

Which video was it?

Not yet, but he could be. The law the GOP and Trump strengthened would allow it. Before they changed the law it was not a felony.

Not a matter of indignation. A case with obvious and simple facts: took/kept/hid/refused to give back documents. Trump himself signed a law to make it a felony (he was hoping to use it against Hillary).

???? https://twitter.com/georgian_legion/status/1610203602471079938?s=20&t=MaxvXxBfigYPdkRGi-ASTA

It's been debunked some time ago already. https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/video-doesnt-prove-capitol-police-allowed-jan-6-protesters-to-enter-capitol/

It's been the case for several years. It's a persistent trend and will not vanish soon. https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states

"Allowed in"? ????

Now you introduce facts in the discussion! That's not fair! ????

Why focus more on it?

From Sun's book too: "He had a call with two generals at about 2:35 p.m., about 20 minutes after the attackers broke through the doors and lawmakers were rushing to safety. He said that Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt said he didn't like the optics of sending uniformed Guard soldiers to the Capitol but would put them at roadside checkpoints. The comment is shocking because it's exactly what Donald Trump and Republicans have claimed Nancy Pelosi said before the attack. It turns out, it came from Trump's allies instead." https://www.rawstory.com/january-6-sund-book-revelations/

Not tired of trolling?

Which media lies? Testimonies under oath. In summary, you have nothing.

The funny steering wheel story has not been confirmed. However, the most important, that Trump was angry and wanted to be driven to the Capitol has been corroborated by other witnesses and evidence. Testimony and communications from Secret Service agents and former White House officials shared Thursday showed former President Trump was intent on traveling to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3687026-testimony-underscores-trumps-desire-to-go-to-capitol-on-jan-6/ https://news.yahoo.com/witness-says-trump-irate-secret-010406520.html

Useful advices here! How to Drain a Swamp First, dig a trench. https://slate.com/technology/2016/10/how-to-drain-a-swamp.html

They did not completely get it wrong, as it is what is shown in the report (see the graph in my previous post). They just did not notice that in was calculated in the model with constant price level, in order to neutralise the effect of inflation.. So 33b in constant price is broadly equivalent to 100b at current price level.

Lol. What a loss of face for him! ????

From the CER report cited in the Independent, the 33 billion figure is not cumulative (unlike your Covid figure), From what I understand, in it also in constant 2009 prices. https://www.cer.eu/insights/cost-brexit-june-2022

BBC News - Russian troops able to freeze sperm for free - lawyer https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-64107729 ????

A liar, a cheat, a crook, and probably a traitor. A dignified MAGA rep. ????

B.S.! It's not about believing MSM, etc... It's about believing scientifically validated data and analyses.

An interesting analysis of the relative level of inaction about Brexit in the political sphere. Britain weathered political turmoil in 2022. But Brexit remains the elephant in the room Analysis by Luke McGee, CNN https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/27/europe/brexit-2023-intl-analysis-cmd-gbr/index.html

So being global has nothing to do with globalisation? Kind of contortionist? "the act or process of globalizing : the state of being globalized especially : the development of an increasingly integrated global economy marked especially by free trade, free flow of capital, and the tapping of cheaper foreign labor markets" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalization

Me stupid! I thought "global Britain" was a key theme of Brexitism! ???? https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/inflection-points/boris-johnson-transforms-global-britain-slogan-into-an-inspiring-strategic-plan/

Which % in London, which voted against Brexit?

If you are so eager to know, then why don't you start by reading scientific publications about it? A large amount of data is already available, and has been investigated. Some links have been already provided in this thread. Here's a meta-analysis of the different studies. It also references most of the scientific studies made so far. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e050278 As mentioned by Bkk Brian, it takes long time to do a serious scientific investigation, such as the one I linked, and to have a Grand Jury making this assessment instead of scientists is a joke.