SiSePuede419

A New Jersey police chief has been accused of defecating on floors, spiking the department coffee with viagra and adderall, and stabbing an officer’s penis with a hypodermic needle among other assualt and harassment claims filed in a complaint. Translation: I think we can let this slide. This is probably another rich guy. We can't be "deranged" about him because he's rich. So that means he can get away with anything. How can we expect him to follow "laws". C'mon. The Golden Rule. He who has the gold makes up the rules as he goes along. 😃

Don't worry. The criminals will investigate themselves. I'm sure the Trump Administration will step forward if they find any wrongdoing. 😃

Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal The administration has downplayed the importance of the text messages inadvertently sent to The Atlantic’s editor in chief. By Jeffrey Goldberg and Shane Harris Well, Trump keeps claiming they're not classified. Release it all. Suckers. 🫡 "Attack plans" are even more "highly classified" than "war plans" since they contain specifics, like type of attack, location, times. You might call this a Moron dump: things really, really stupid people do, then try and lie about when they get caught red handed. 😂

Maybe the problem was Signal. If there's a problem with Signal, then nobody should use it. --Donald Trump, Stable Jenius Uhhh... Handling classified info improperly is a crime (e.g., under the Espionage Act and Presidential Records Act). 😂 Bottom Line For personal privacy, Signal is one of the best messaging apps out there. But for top secret government communication, it’s a major security risk and completely against protocol.

CIA Director Flips Out When Asked if Hegseth Was Drunk in Group Chat Some salt,a twist of lime and 100% Triple sec, I mean Opsec, sir. 🫡

Goldberg, however, repeatedly reached out to the White House before and after publication to gain additional context on the Signal chat and ensure that publishing the full texts would not cause harm. In a response, Goldberg reported Wednesday, Leavitt described some of the information as sensitive and said the White House would prefer it not be published. Dear Sir or Madam, We prefer you not publish the Highly classified sensitive information We accidentally sent to you Because we're incompetent boobs Who f'up and included a journalist on an illegal Signal Group chat. We never regret the error. But cut us a break We're new at this treason for no reason stuff 😆

Goldberg published the chat where Walz invited him. Two brain cells are required for this. Put down whatever you're holding with your right hand when you think about Trump putting kids in cages. Maybe that will free up the other one. 😀

It's not criminal to accept an invitation. The Trump administration lied and said the highly classified and sensitive information was "not classified". So Goldberg released more of the chat to prove they're lying and it was highly classified. So which is it? You can't have it both ways. Once again it's too late to ask for your money back for your law degree from Kmart because they're bankrupt. 😭

God the slackjaw Jeniuses don't understand how the US National Security apparatus works and their posts make them look like a 5 year old with a plastic sherrif badge, so they know all about law enforcement. Goldberg was invited to the illegal chat by Walz, a Trump advisor. Do you have two functioning brain cells to register that fact? Hold up one finger for yes. 🤣

Uhhh. The entire chat? Clearly classified. War plans. Top Secret. Targets, times. "Absolutely classified." Oh my God We all know it. Stop the propaganda, Luke. You've gone to the dark side. 🧘‍♀️

Thank goodness it's not a US Post Office. Dejoy has set the timer on the bomb 💣 And he's getting out of there quick. Skedaddle! 😲 Head of the Post Office Resigns, as DOGE Seeks to Downsize It

OK. You're the self professed expert. Is someone with Klinefelter Syndrome (XXY) XY male or an XX female? Educate us with your vast knowledge of genetics and gender. Derp derp derp. 😄 a foolish or ignorant person (dɜːp ) noun., slang. a foolish or ignorant person: used as a term of address.

Despite being the matriarch of one of the most influential tech dynasties, speaking to the New York Times [Elon Musk's mother] confirmed that her billionaire son doesn’t hand out Tesla discounts. Whew! What a relief. Musk treats everyone equally. This will be quite comforting to know When the masked men Take you off to El Salvador You're just being treated like Everyone else 😀

Democrats tried to warn everyone these were incompetent freaks, wackjobs and drunks. But noooo... Joe Applephone Tesla Sixpack believed the Timeshare condominium salesman when he said he was going to bring down the price of groceries on Day One. 😂

Don't worry. Pete Hegseth will get to the bottom of this... If it's a champagne bottle. 😄

The Atlantic magazine, not the ocean. That's who Trump's gang released TopSecret info to illegally. Crime, crime, crime, crime, crime. Do you oxygen thieves have anything with a little less crime in'it 😃 Doy! 😄

I wouldn't call Trump an activist. Except for Putin. In America, he's known as a flimflam man. Just go back and watch Trump's appearance on Letterman show. He was a laughingstock in NYC in the 80s+ 😄

Yes, this was a massive blunder that raises serious questions... It wasn't a "leak". The Editor of the Atlantic was invited to an illegal signal chat. God you people are denso roboto✅ According to Jeffrey Goldberg, the Trump administration Mike Walz accidentally added him to a Signal group chat where high-ranking officials—including VP JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—were discussing imminent military strikes in Yemen. The messages reportedly included detailed attack plans, specific targets, and timing. Goldberg initially thought it was a mistake, but when the planned strikes actually happened, he realized the messages were legitimate. The White House later confirmed the security breach and said an investigation was underway. MAGA yawns. "IOKIYAR." It's their only value If it weren't fer that they would have none 🫛

Sure, everyone here has drank champagne at work. And let their kids sip it, too. Totally normal. And so verrrrrrrry professional. [SNICKER] Thanks for the beer. Cheers! You lost that bet. 🥂 😄 “Bottoms Up”— Pete Hegseth Took Swigs from Champagne Bottle, Plunged Into the Alcoholic Beverage During Fox News Broadcast Hegseth’s kids were present and sampled the dunk tank champagne

Afghanistan, Afghanistan, Afghanistan. All of a sudden you care a lot about Kabul? Where were you when Chimpy invaded? Believe or not I was against going into Aghanistan. I was in the minority. We shouldn't have gone in there in the first place. Common sense. You can't change cavemen mentality. After 9/11, 90% supported Bush's military action in Aghanistan. One redneck in a bar in Flagstaff almost punched me out after he told me he was proud to be American. I told him no one chooses where they're born. Be it in the slums of Calcutta or the middle of nowhere cowtown Arizona. Oh, the seething anger. Do MAGA Jeniuses all think self-determination of birthplace is some kind of divine right only for themselves? 😄

100% OPSEC. We are currently clean on OPSEC. He's like a little boy using a big word he doesn't know what it means. 😄 OPSEC (Operational Security) is a risk management process that involves identifying, analyzing, and protecting critical information to prevent adversaries from exploiting it.

Isn't something that's mostly false considered "B.S."? 😄 This statement is mostly false but contains some elements of truth depending on how you interpret it. The U.S. has spent trillions on defense since World War II, and a significant portion of that has been related to defending Europe, primarily during the Cold War through NATO. However, calling it "defending the Euro zone" is misleading because: 1. The Eurozone didn't exist until 1999 – The U.S. was defending Western Europe long before the creation of the euro. 2. Cold War Context – The primary reason for U.S. military spending in Europe was to counter the Soviet Union, not to protect the economic interests of the Eurozone. 3. NATO and Collective Defense – The U.S. committed to defending Europe under NATO agreements, but European nations also contributed significantly to their own defense. 4. Costs – While the U.S. has spent trillions on defense since WWII, only a portion of that was directly related to Europe. Much of the spending also covered the Korean War, Vietnam War, Middle East conflicts, and global military operations. Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha. 😭

Let's see, the current alibi is they didn't care if our foreign enemies learned about our secret war plans so they could kill American soldiers. They cared more about the "liberals" Inspector Generals finding out their plans involving treason against the US. That's why they had to hide it on Signal instead of going through the usual classified channels. It's all the fault of "liberals" who want to enforce "laws". Silly Liberals! We elected a criminal. DUH. 😄 King Trump says your petty laws don't apply to royalty. It's all your fault. 🤴

No, according to the U.S. classified information handling system, it is not permissible to use a public app such as Signal to discuss Top Secret or any classified information. Reasons: 1. Security Classification Requirements – Classified information (Confidential, Secret, Top Secret) must be handled through approved government-secured communication channels. 2. Secure Systems – U.S. government agencies use dedicated systems like: SIPRNet (Secret Internet Protocol Router Network) for Secret-level information. JWICS (Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System) for Top Secret information. NSA-approved secure communication devices for classified discussions. 3. Risk of Unauthorized Access – Public apps like Signal, WhatsApp, or Telegram are not government-certified for classified discussions, even if they offer encryption. 4. Legal Consequences – Mishandling classified data by discussing it on unauthorized platforms can lead to violations of the Espionage Act and other federal security laws. FIRE EVERYONE YOU WEAK TRAITOROUS WIMPS 💪

REED: Were you using your private phone or a public phone for the Signal discussions? GABBARD: I won't speak to this because it's under review Uhhh.... "Lock her up", right? . Right? . . Anyone? . . . Anyone? . . . . Bueller....? 😄