FruitPudding

I actually didn't think they had the sense and I'm pleasantly surprised.

Quite the investigator, aren't you? Perhaps the bleeding did occur right away, but the mother only noticed the blood on her underwear a few days later when she was doing the laundry. Unless, you think the rape triggered her first menstrual cycle? Let me guess, you are a doctor too.

Did you read the details in the link you posted? Cos I didn't know it was about that until you posted that information. Maybe, they aren't stupid. They can just have a live-in GF without the risk that comes with marriage. It's a million baht, not a few quid. Happily single. And not moaning. Just having a laugh at the " sin sod" - even the word sounds nasty. You'd think they could have a nicer sounding word for it, ????

Exactly ???? It defeats the point in getting married. For a million baht, he might as well just monger around the red light areas for a couple of decades.

There are so many points in this that are a lot of rubbish. Firstly, if it's only paid for virgins, a dowry would be rarer than a lightning strike. Also, the virgin part of the tradition makes it sound like prostitution, no? Why the sexual element to the tradition? Sounds a bit like what I was saying. You are proving my point for me, Tranny. ???? Cheers. The rest of it just sounds like hell and also a lot of excuses to use their daughter to extract money out of a bloke. Typical.

I'm happy single. ???? No woes on that front, or I should say hoes (when a dowry is involved)? As Jay Z said, "I got 99 problems, but a b*tch ain't one."

Hang this beast by the balls until dead.

So, what's the rationale of the dowry here there?

That certainly doesn't last long after marriage.

They sound like such reasonable people. No logic; big ego. She sounds like a keeper.

Who do these people think they are?? What is he ACTUALLY GETTING? She'll be more of a financial liability, than an asset -- I guarantee it! That is actually why in India the bride's family pays the dowry to the man, which makes more sense, since he's taking on a liability and her family has one less mouth to feed. Otherwise, it's just blatant prostitution.

Just look back at our comments in this thread. It literally happened today. ????

Yeah, you exclaimed, "You people?" Then you called me a bigot and vaguely mentioned rhetoric.

Exactly, and even the guys who aren't bottom, I am sure one of the attractions is the schlong they have......like, they aren't in it for the vagina. Of course, they are gay.

I was saying "you" (plural) referring to the LBGT group because you were happy the last time when I said "you people"

Because I don't accept that straight guys are attracted to ladyboys? I think you are taking the Mickey Yous have made up loads of new words and concepts, yet yous can't think of a different word for a guy you likes ladyboys. Please..... you're pulling my leg

But they aren't straight, lol What's your basis for calling them straight? You just need to call them something else. You people are good at making up words, so it shouldn't be too hard.

Well, hey, you do you, man. ????

Legally, probably would still be his fault anyway. Is that what happened here?

I think you could accurately describe them as bisexual if they are attracted to both ladyboys and females. If they are attracted to ladyboys only, I'd call them gay. Maybe they prefer a feminine man, over a masculine one; their still gay.

If he went through a red light it's 100% his fault.

I fail to see how it's 50/50.

If it were me, I don't think I could live with myself.

If they are straight, why are they attracted to biological males?

Does it really matter?