Bkk Brian

No, Visionary means Visonary, more woke nonsense Your attempt to redefine what woke means is a huge fail.

More excellent work for the benefit of the west: https://x.com/DrEliDavid/status/1866517904851874217 Israel wipes out bulk of Syria’s strategic weapons stockpiles in airstrikes The strikes were carried out so that rebel groups linked to al Qaeda and Islamic State — which drove Assad out — would not gain access to the weaponry, Israeli officials said. “We have no intention of interfering in Syria’s internal affairs, but we clearly intend to do what is necessary to ensure our security,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/world-news/israel-wipes-out-bulk-of-syrias-strategic-weapons-stockpile/

Is that why Ireland had to redefine the definition of Genocide? ICJ never found it plausible as was widely miss reported, that was false, so to try and get a conviction Ireland changes the meaning to something that they hope will have at least a slim chance to stick.

I am not so confident Abu Mohammad al-Julani has left no room for doubt about his Islamic intentions for the region... In a previous video, this Muslim leader openly declared: "Our goal is not only to reach Damascus. Jerusalem awaits us after Damascus." Let that sink in. Their goal is not just conquest—it’s the march on Jerusalem. Anyone who places their trust in an Islamic movement is inviting destruction. It is not ignorance; it is a death wish. Is this another Biden "victory"... https://x.com/AmyMek/status/1865968429775364484

Ireland has also jumped on the bandwagon by showing willingness to manipulate international law following Amnesties lead of changing the definition of Genocide to suit. Ireland’s Move at the ICJ Redefining The Meaning of Genocide to get a Conviction Martin’s position, however, does not emerge in isolation. It draws inspiration from a recent Amnesty International report on the conflict. The report controversially claimed that Israel was not guilty of genocide under traditional international law but proposed redefining the term to fit their conclusion. This shift in approach damaged Amnesty’s credibility; leaks, disavowals from its Israel chapter, and widespread criticism followed the report’s publication. Despite the backlash, the Irish government appears willing to follow Amnesty’s lead, potentially sacrificing the integrity of international law to align with the organization’s narrative. https://aseannow.com/topic/1346052-ireland’s-move-at-the-icj-redefining-the-meaning-of-genocide-to-get-a-conviction/#comment-19443299

If you want me to admit that I made a mistake then of course. Are you happy now? I'm not like some that attempt to deflect. If a mistake is made its not hard to admit to it. That said, it was also true that she was lying. Happy you can see the proof that she was actually lying.

Yes I do, its at the top of all pages so lets talk about it, what would you like to say? Talk about deflection. Still waiting for you to come up with these IDF denials that you claim sounds similar.

Actually I can confirm I did and indeed the proof is there. Her own words: "You can see all the Jewish, Christian and Muslim" Pure lies from Lyse Doucet

IDF denials of what? I know what the topic is about @stevenl

Now when you accuse someone of lying (which you do often enough) Can you quote where I accused anyone of lying on this topic? I see you are making false claims yet again. Why? Now stick to the claims made and read the posts because its clear you are not. Yet more clarification of her misrepresentation No Jews left in the Damascus Jewish quarter With the fall of the Assad regime, it did not take long for western journalists to be misrepresenting ‘diverse, pluralistic’ Syria as a haven for Jews. https://www.jewishrefugees.org.uk/2024/12/no-jews-left-in-the-damascus-jewish-quarter.html

You are misrepresenting what she said and claimed though, she did not say that, she said they were celebrating right behind her in the old city hall. She even looked in that direction as she claimed it. You've failed again.

Oh please I'm not taking up my time to watch unverified allegations. If you want to post a video then mark the time where the evidence is presented and tell me what it is so I can check. Back to the facts: Hamas leader refuses to acknowledge killing of civilians in Israel A senior Hamas leader has refused to acknowledge that his group killed civilians in Israel, claiming only conscripts were targeted. Moussa Abu Marzouk told the BBC that "women, children and civilians were exempt" from Hamas's attacks. His claims are in stark contrast to the wealth of evidence of Hamas men shooting unarmed adults and children. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67321241

Because I prefer facts and I hate Hamas, they are murderous terrorists who torture, rape, hold hostages and want to wipe out Israel in their genocidal acts. Its ok, Israel is on top of this now and eliminating most of them..

Actually it does make far more credible. Hamas terrorists credibility vs Israel. Of course you would prefer to question that fact.

Nope, I did not but another maybe or might moment from you will I am sure be along shortly. Oh and my response was 3 hours after you posted it so urgency was not really a factor, well maybe not anyway, or it might have been. Oh look, as I said, everyone can do it.....

More off topic nonsense and diversion from your failure to head to the link when I told you...jeez Only post a link, the headline and three sentences from the article. Content in the public domain is limited to the same restrictions. https://aseannow.com/forum_rules/

Off topic nonsense. I quoted the headline and 3 sentences as per forum rules. What a lame diversion for your failure to go to the link where you would have found it

I prefer to believe Israel rather than Hamas

Still waiting, its not me, its from the link that you obviously didn't go to despite me telling you its there.

Exactly, it can be said in almost any situation, that's why most people don't bother apart from you

Why? Can you show me where I made that claim, I'll wait Chomper, promise........

Well facts say otherwise as evidenced in your posts. Good Day

Its in the link Comper

Correct, as evidenced in your posts where you claimed you never edited her quote when you did. Extremely deceitful. Now can you be trusted to visit the article link where she clearly states why she walked back the statement, the full statement I mean, not the one you edited and censored and then claimed you didn't. Because all your answers are actually contained there if you can read them. I don't bother debating with dishonest debaters.

I am pointing out facts about your dishonesty actually, its on the internet!