Bkk Brian

Why not read the link yourself. Francesca Albanese, who has history of antisemitic remarks and appeared to justify Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre, claims https://www.timesofisrael.com/contentious-un-rapporteur-accuses-israel-of-several-acts-of-genocide-in-gaza/

Yes this is what he says because its not true that this is reminiscent of what the Nazis did to the Jews starting in 1930s Germany.

Cherry picked edits there. He also said to Israel. “Be strong, be smart and let's get this over with and when its over your going to be back to having a great life" https://twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1772735829074403439

Their rights expert is Francesca Albanese, who has history of antisemitic remarks and appeared to justify Hamas's Oct. 7 massacre, yea right.

Its a UN report, if you want to question it that's up to you. Your ever lasting support for Russia and its war crimes is rock solid. Keep it up, you must be very proud of yourself.

Yes of course they would have obeyed, if both demands were linked. Ceasefire and Hostages released. It would have been a fantastic deal for them. 2 weeks ceasefire in return for all the hostages released with no other conditions attached aside from more humanitarian aid. Now put that next to the separate hostage and prisoner exchange deal and ceasefire that's been discussed in Qatar for the last few weeks. I don't have to go through all the conditions that Hamas listed in that. If you cant see the above you need another real dose of reality instead of blaming Israel and minimizing the atrocities and evil intent of Hamas all the time.

My quote was directly from the BBC take it up with them. Can you provide a link to all your other claims. I would like to see how credible they all are and if any are misleading

I honestly had no idea the UN was this bias before Oct 7th. Its certainly opened my eyes to their antisemitism

😴....tedious baiting go to the topic and read

Told you many times, I don't play word games with you right?

There is a topic for that with all the factual details unlike your commentary version UNSC passes resolutions ‘an immediate ceasefire’ 'unconditional release of hostages' https://aseannow.com/topic/1323270-unsc-passes-resolutions-‘an-immediate-ceasefire’-unconditional-release-of-hostages

You can state all you want, its in black and white:

Stop playing games and look at our string of posts

Everybody wants the war finished when all has been achieved, not just Trump

Yes I know you do, but I told you before I don't care what you want. I want Hamas eliminated so no other Oct 7th occur.

stop digging, you claimed he would refuse a deal. Netanyahu will not respect his part of any deal on a ceasefire and openly says it.

The Road to Ceasefire Leads Through the Rafah Offensive | Opinion The military strategy for Hamas' October 7 attack was to create the largest scale of atrocity possible and survive Israel's counterattack. Then, having survived, it intended to build up for many more October 7 attacks, all with the aim of achieving its grand strategic goal: the destruction of Israel and the death of the Jewish people. Ghazi Hamad, a senior Hamas political leader, stated as much, saying, "Israel is a country that has no place on our land. We must remove that country ... the Al-Aqsa Flood is just the first time, and there will be a second, third, and fourth. Will we pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it." Hamas's hope is that repeated attacks like October 7 will eventually break the will of the Israeli population. To do that, Hamas would need to survive the war. https://www.newsweek.com/road-ceasefire-leads-through-rafah-offensive-opinion-1878137

No its not, its your lie that they refused a ceasefire, stop the deflection

Why? Do you want Hamas to survive and attack again? Do you want the hostages to stay ion the tunnels in Rafah?

A 6-week ceasefire means fire resumes after 6 weeks. yes if the second stage of the deal broke down, which was an extension for more hostages and prisoners to be released. The first stage and first 6 weeks was for 40 hostages, other stages and ceasefires were then to be discussed. What is it you are not getting about this, you were wrong, Israel is very open to a ceasefire. It is also committed to finishing the job

And even if they do put it on hold for 6 weeks, that doesn't change anything. Yes it changes everything, it makes your statement untrue as there will be a ceasefire. They do not call it putting it on hold, they call it a ceasefire. The UN resolution ceasefire was till the end of Ramadan, around two weeks. However still a ceasefire.

The US ambassador to the UN said the Security Council's resolution on a ceasefire in Gaza is "non-binding" and that a ceasefire will not happen without the “release of hostages”, after abstaining. https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1772500272805191829

You said: Netanyahu will not respect his part of any deal on a ceasefire and openly says it. From 24 March: That's why I responded with not true, as it is not true............. Rafah has nothing to do with the hostage and prisoner exchange talks in Qatar. A 6 week ceasefire was on the table although apparently that's just been refused by Hamas again since the UN resolutions

So none of this is true then? Mentioned in the OP https://david-collier.com/bbc-verify/

Can you link to where he is refusing a ceasefire as part of the current hostage deal talks in Qatar?