Bkk Brian

There is a topic on that and has a far better balanced discussion, no he is not admitting defeat as insinuated on your edited and cut vid. Global Peace Summit Affirms Ukraine's Territorial Integrity Amid Absence of Russia & China https://aseannow.com/topic/1329914-global-peace-summit-affirms-ukraines-territorial-integrity-amid-absence-of-russia-china/#comment-18995671

Never seen anyone called a "a Putin paid asset". Is that you making things up again?

Not if they were being used by Hamas terrorists. 👌

"Each of the more than 100 plaintiffs in this suit is a U.S. citizen, or the family member of a U.S. citizen" Here's an opposing one......... A federal court case filed against President Joe Biden and two U.S. cabinet officials for allegedly being complicit in Israel’s genocide against Gazans will move forward with a hearing on Friday. The case, which names Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin as defendants, was filed by Palestinian human rights groups and individuals with help from the nonprofit Center for Constitutional Rights. Defense for Children International–Palestine v. Biden seeks to stop the U.S. from supporting Israel, which plaintiffs say has cost them the lives of family members, and will be heard in Oakland, Calif. https://time.com/6588752/biden-lawsuit-israel-palestinian-genocide/

So fortunate that the IDF rescued her before mum died. RIP https://x.com/nypost/status/1808092464911147280

Russians running like rabbits. Courtesy of Ministry of Defense of Ukraine 🇺🇦 Tank in service with the 1st Tank Brigade is destroying the enemy positions in close combat. The occupiers are running away.

Deflection and dishonest debating again. Proof of where I addressed it below:

Stop the baiting and get back on topic this is not about Professors economists, social media owners or pedos such as Ritter who you claimed in a previous post. https://aseannow.com/forum_rules/

I mean this: "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source." If you cant understand that then I cannot help you further

What I mean is a credible link, stop telling me what I mean.

Together with your last post and its personal insults we now have dishonesty. I have not refused to engage with those words, I specifically referred to how that question was answered in a post above. 39% replied it was not from school or from an adult at school. Do you know all the other questions asked yet so you can get your evidence on the claims you made?

yawn....from the article "To answer this and other related questions, we commissioned a study on a nationally representative sample of 1,505 18- to 20-year-old Americans—a demographic that has yet to graduate from, or only recently graduated from, high school" Living in Oppositeworld much No but we have obviously reached the personal insults stage from you

So why did you write "They are assuming they've been to school, yes correct......lol" Because most adults have been to school......why did you think I laughed....lol. Very different from your claim: "You defended the use of the questions specifically citing schools on the grounds that the people being asked were students" Still waiting for a list to all the questions from the study to back up your claims!

Netherlands completes export license for 24 F-16s, jets to reach Ukraine 'soon.' The Dutch defense minister did not disclose the exact date or other delivery details, citing "operational security" concerns. https://kyivindependent.com/netherlands-completes-export-license-for-24-f-16s-jets-to-reach-ukraine-soon/

1. Quote me where I defended the use of them being asked questions because they were students? 2. If they were such good leading questions why when asked where they heard about the concepts did 39% reply it was not from school or from an adult at school? 3. Why were those who had replied to the negative then put in a sub set for seperate questions? 1. Those who didn’t report being taught any of the five CRT-related concepts serve as the reference group for tests of statistical significance. 2. The “Have not been taught” group serves as the reference category for tests of statistical significance. Or you could just get a list of their questions to back up your claims which are that the study is based on leading questions

Just because someone has been to school, that doesn't mean school is their only, or even, their chief source of information. Deflection, nobody claimed it did and again you are speculating without even knowing the rest of the questions or reading the report study. Like I said at the beginning come back to me when you have the evidence, ie the questions. Not your opinions.

"Thinking about the school you attended..." that's not part of a leading question? Explicitly directing attention to a possible source does not make a question leading? Your defense of these questions is laughable. They are assuming they've been to school, yes correct......lol "1,505 18- to 20-year-old Americans—a demographic that has yet to graduate from, or only recently graduated from, high school." You don't have the questions, the article gives a very small snapshot of the actual report "Manhattan Institute report of all the findings from this study will be published in the coming months; what follows is a preview of some of them. Our analysis here focuses mainly on the results for the sample overall rather than for various subgroups."

What I still understand is that you do not have a list of the questions asked yet you claim they were leading questions. I also understand the few questions that have been published are not leading questions and explanations are also there for a few. In addition I also know the authors are not saying they are leading questions. “Thinking about the school you attended, were you ever taught any of the following concepts in class or did you hear them from adults in the school you attended?” Those who didn’t report being taught any of the five CRT-related concepts serve as the reference group for tests of statistical significance. The “Have not been taught” group serves as the reference category for tests of statistical significance. Although I now see you have reverted to whether its peer reviewed or not.....lol. Since when do surveys/studies of these types get peer reviewed? Can you show me some examples? Its not published in a scientific journal.....lol

So no link to the bizarre claim then

Making things up again.

The rules of the forum, its to stop people making things up and claiming them as true

Of course it matters, this is not a leading question, they are not claiming they are either, only you. "Specifically, we asked those who reported being taught at least one of the listed concepts in a high school class what, if anything, they were taught about arguments opposing them."

No a link to an explanation as to why. Quite different to an ad hominem attack

Why are you speaking for Bob? If they are true put a credible link to the claims. Its that simple

The words from the article do not claim the study uses leading questions either.....................