Bkk Brian

If I was you I would read the forum rules. Noted however you antisemitic vile post.

then preceded to open his Jewish mouth, and tried eating his Jewish foot. Vile disgusting statement.

I wasn't responding to political leaders or western commentators, I do know who I was responding to and with reason,

If you can believe it! They don't even know how many hostages are alive. Hamas says Gaza death toll reaches 34,183 https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/hamas-says-gaza-death-toll-reaches-34183/

Colonna stressed that U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres appointed the independent review panel to review UNRWA’s neutrality — not to investigate Israeli allegations that 12 UNRWA staffers participated in the Oct. 7 attacks. Guterres ordered the U.N. internal watchdog, the Office of Internal Oversight Services, known as OIOS, to conduct a separate investigation into those Israeli allegations. “It is a separate mission. And it is not in our mandate,” Colonna said. She also said it is not surprising that Israel did not provide evidence of its allegations to the refugee agency “because it doesn’t owe this evidence during the investigation to UNRWA but to the OIOS.” In a wide-ranging 48-page report released Monday, the independent panel said UNRWA has “robust” procedures to uphold the U.N. principle of neutrality, but it cited serious gaps in implementation, including staff publicly expressing political views, textbooks used in schools the agency runs with “problematic content” and staff unions disrupting operations. It makes 50 recommendations to improve UNRWA’s neutrality. https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-unrwa-united-nations-28a63ddef23efdc4b050b0bcbdb587ff Full report pdf download link https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2024/04/unrwa_independent_review_on_neutrality.pdf

Because you'd rather believe the Pro Palastinian activist march organizer. What a surprise.

What mob is calling out blatant discrimination? Since when have you been speaking for what the UK public laugh at?

Link to where I would change my argument? There is nothing about it I would change, the facts remain the same and the reason the Met apologized remain the same. You don't know how edited it was you never watched it. You don't know the 8 min clip I posted, you never watched it. You don't know the Sky News original, you never watch it.

The basis for my argument remains the same from my first post on here. There is zero change. Then of course not watching the vids you wouldn't know.

What did I fall for exactly when I had already watched it all? The link to it is in the new OP well before it was posted on here. Again what did I fall for?

I’ve explained more than once why I don’t watch videos in discussion forums. Yes a pity you would have been informed before as we all were on the comments and parts that were not in the OP text. If you read the new topic why did you ask me what Rushi said?

Perhaps this is why, in response to a post? It seems you have a problem with me responding to it? Why would that be?

What is the point you are trying to make?

Have you watched the vid? Have you read the new topic that contains Rushi response?

Yes I do know the police officer did call Mr Falter 'openly Jewish' and I do know they threatened to arrest him, I posted an 8 min clip of the incident. I have no need to make any point to you, I was responding to someone else with a point to his post, do you get that part?

"Rishi Sunak was "appalled" by the way police treated a Jewish man during a pro-Palestinian demonstration in London, a Downing Street source has said. Downing Street said the prime minister had seen the original footage of what happened and was "appalled as everyone else by the officer calling Mr Falter 'openly Jewish'"."

So the police didn't say you are openly Jewish then and didn't threaten to arrest him? You've not watched the vids so how would you know?

This was on the cards eventually I guess. Qatar has had enough of them hopefully. Hamas leaders said looking at leaving Qatar amid growing pressure in hostage talks Hamas’s political chiefs are exploring moving their base of operations out of Qatar, The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday, as the Gulf state faces increasing pressure over its influence with the terror group in indirect hostage-for-truce negotiations with Israel. Citing Arab officials, the report said Hamas has recently contacted two regional countries about having its leaders live there, one of which is Oman. The outlet noted that if Hamas leaders were to leave Doha, it could be more difficult for negotiations to be held with the terror group. https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-leaders-said-looking-at-leaving-qatar-amid-growing-pressure-in-hostage-talks/

Its not about what you can find, the police chief says otherwise. Sir Mark replied: “I’m not disputing that. “It’s very clear Jewish communities in London are traumatised and upset and sometimes fearful, based on events that happened overseas and the increasing hate crime in London. And that’s an awful place for us to be as a capital city, and we are doing everything we can do to tackle that.” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/mark-rowley-london-jews-sadiq-khan-london-assembly-b2440513.html

A question that went over your head in meaning obviously. The topic here is about Jews being discriminated in London for being overly Jewish and told to move on as a result.

So what if they accuse Israel of Genocide? What has that got to do with the Jews in London getting threatened and discriminated against?

Here about 50 pages on the ICJ topic SA and Israel this is not it. We all know demonstrators accuse Israel. Again you've deflected from the aggressive mob chanting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free." A genocide chant: US House resolution condemns chant ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ The slogan “seeks to deny Jewish people the right to self-determination and calls for the removal of the Jewish people from their ancestral homeland,” the resolution text continues, alleging that it is a “rallying cry” that promotes violence against both the State of Israel and Diaspora Jewry, and “does a disservice to Israelis, Palestinians and all those in the region who seek peace.” Presenting the motion to the House, D’Esposito charged that “this slogan communicates one thing and one thing only. It is not human rights, and it is certainly not peace. It is the violent destruction of the State of Israel.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-house-resolution-condemns-chant-from-the-river-to-the-sea-palestine-will-be-free/ Rishi Sunak, “Those who chant ‘from river to the sea, Palestine will be free’, are either useful idiots who do not understand what they are saying, or worse, people who wish to wipe the Jewish state from the map”. https://timelinedaily.com/world/those-chanting-from-river-to-the-sea-palestine-will-be-free-are-useful-idiots-rishi-sunak

The genocide reference is to the protestors chanting "From the River to the Sea" not ICJ stop the trolling ..................again and stay on topic

There are other sources as well UN, US, EU, No, there is only one source, Hamas and its unverified numbers. Those above you mention are quoting Hamas figures.