Bkk Brian

Like the guys who put up links to credible sources about Hamas claind of Israelis release of lions to eat palestinian children How high did the sarcasm on that post fly over your head? Do you really believe that poster was making that claim........lol

Here we go....................

Point 1 Link to your claims, your points are not credible and you remain making an unsubstantiated claim Point 2 Israel declared war on the 7th Oct

Yet I only ever see links posted from you from Russian or Al Jizz how interesting

The question that needs answering for me is where is your link to your claim that Malcolm Nance is a questionable source? Malcolm Wrightson Nance (born 1961)[1] is an American author and media pundit. He is a former United States Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer specializing in naval cryptology. Nance is an intelligence and foreign policy analyst who frequently discusses the history, personalities, and organization of jihadi radicalization and al-Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIS), Southwest Asian and African terror groups, as well as counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare.[2] He has learned Arabic and is active in the field of national security policy[3] particularly, in anti- and counter-terrorism intelligence, terrorist strategy and tactics, torture and counter-ideology in combating Islamic extremism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Nance Your other question on the Israeli conduct towards the Palestinian people for the last 20 years or more you have already shown to be more interested in than what actually started the war on the 7th. So no surprise there.

"Hamas commanders knew as soon as they slit the throat of the first woman, shot the first child in the head or set fire to a 90 year old holocaust survivor in Israel that many Palestinian children of Gaza were as good as dead" "New evidence reveals that Hamas planners intended to strike a blow of historic proportions on Oct. 7 with the expectation that their actions would compel an overwhelming Israeli response." Hamas envisioned deeper attacks, aiming to provoke an Israeli war The evidence, described by more than a dozen current and former intelligence and security officials from four Western and Middle Eastern countries, reveals an intention by Hamas planners to strike a blow of historic proportions, in the expectation that their actions would compel an overwhelming Israeli response. Several officials who had not previously spoken about the matter said the intelligence about Hamas’s motivations has become stronger in recent days. The findings also shed new light on the tactics and methods used by Hamas to deceive Israel’s vaunted intelligence establishment and thwart initial efforts by the Israel Defense Forces to stop the attack. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/12/hamas-planning-terror-gaza-israel/ https://archive.ph/EISFO HAMAS Needs Children to Die The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) led by the Israeli Air Force (IAF) is world renown for delivering punishing blows to terrorist enemies. They often use such devastating fire power, in the dense urban forest of the Gaza Strip, that civilians regularly suffer. In the smoke and dust from a distant TV camera, these strikes may look indiscriminate, but they are quite precise. Make no doubt, the IAF hits what it aims at. But regrettably innocent people within the blast effects are both killed and injured. But only one side of this conflict planned for the deaths of Palestinian civilian population as an integral part of their strategy. That is the terrorist group HAMAS. https://malcolmnance.substack.com/p/hamas-needs-children-to-die

Yes noted your previous sources that you prefer from Russia as well

How would you know, you have most posters on ignore.........lol

"Hamas denies" from Al Jizz. 🤣

Up to date round up of all the latest events including at Shifa hospital Hamas terrorists are 'losing their grip' on Gaza amid Israeli onslaught, IDF spokesman claims 'We've dismantled more than 15 company-size and battalion-size Hamas strongholds.' 'Our assessment is that their command functions and their ability to effectively conduct military operations and control the population simultaneously, is challenged,' he said. 'And their ability to do so is limited – they're not totally vanquished. They still have some control and influence, but it is far from what they would like and a big difference from what there was a month ago.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12740547/Hamas-terrorists-losing-grip-Gaza-amid-Israeli-onslaught-IDF-spokesman-claims.html

Fury as Channel 4 dubs pro-Palestine protests 'peaceful' despite mob hounding Housing Secretary Michael Gove and Met Police detaining 150 Reform UK party leader Richard Tice said in response: ‘Lie of the day… Ofcom this is deliberate biased misinformation.’ Channel 4 deleted the tweet following the backlash. Kieran Bradley, an assistant producer at LBC, said: ‘This isn’t accurate reporting of today’s events and what unfolded in Central London.’ He added: ‘It can only be described as “peaceful” if you blatantly ignore the pockets of violence, disturbance in Victoria, racist signs and genocidal chants for the eradication of Israel.’ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12739207/Fury-Channel-4-pro-Palestine-protests-peaceful.html

Including yours when you compared the Israelis with the Nazis in the other topic?

"Our troops risked their lives to hand-deliver 300 liters of fuel to the Shifa hospital for urgent medical purposes. Hamas forbade the hospital from taking it. Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry has been warning for weeks that its hospitals are running out of fuel. If so, why would they prevent the hospital from receiving it?"

Bye, don't tease us now.........lol

Probably a lot more than was in that group of right wingers

I tried that, he failed on 3 of them and is still rolling...

I dispute that there was any conclusion that disavows that Israel has committed gross war crimes and can fairly be described as ... war criminals.

I don't need to go to wiki, read the law from the link I posted: The rules of LOAC provide some protections for civilians, but civilians can lawfully be killed in war. The LOAC principle of distinction prohibits attacks directed against civilians, meaning it is unlawful to intentionally target civilians. Civilians, however, may be incidentally harmed or killed in attacks directed at military objectives. The LOAC principle of proportionality only prohibits attacks against military objectives if the attack is expected to cause incidental harm to civilians or civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. Thus, the principle of proportionality implicitly authorizes the knowing or foreseeable (but not intentional) killing of civilians in certain circumstances. Indeed, the ratio of civilian to combatant deaths has increased over the past century, particularly with the advent of aerial warfare, the development of more destructive weapons, and the urbanization of societies.

No need. "to carry out attacks against military objectives with the knowledge that civilians will be killed"

Collateral damage is an accepted consequence of warfare. The law of armed conflict (LOAC) permits soldiers to carry out attacks against military objectives with the knowledge that civilians will be killed, provided the attack is consistent with the requirements of the principle of proportionality. https://lieber.westpoint.edu/collateral-damage-innocent-bystanders-war/

Of course they new some civilians may get killed, but also as with the rules of war, its the proportionality as to how many, we don't know how many terrorists were also killed.

Your still claiming without evidence it was a targeted deliberate act to kill all those civilians and the outcome was entirely predictable. There is nothing in your links to back up those claims "Huge lie. Dropping bombs on a refugee camp is knowingly, willingly and deliberately killing civilians. The fact that hundreds of civilians were killed and that the outcome was entirely predictable makes it deliberate."

Your claim: "Huge lie. Dropping bombs on a refugee camp is knowingly, wilingly and deliberately killing civilians. The fact that hundreds of civilians were killed and that the outcome was entirely predictable makes it deliberate."

You are not getting away with your unsubstantiated claims. Links to those needed

a meme..........your on a roll down the tunnels