Bkk Brian

Correct and that's all I've got to say on it to you.

Yes they were publishing polls for months even a few before Oct 7th. I'm surprised you've not come across all the links to them, but interesting for you to catch up agreed.

No you are making things up about what I said

And

Hamas was created by the Muslim Brotherhood since 1987. Nothing to do with this war started on the 7th Oct

Irrelevant to the one from the 10th March then..................jeez or is this a competition to see how many polls we can find from the last 5 months

Nonsense, this has been discussed numerous times in previous topics. Hamas was receiving the same money from Qatar years before the Israeli gov helped facilitate it along with the knowledge of the US and is still to this day receiving it from Qatar. Hamas has plenty of other streams of cash, there's whole topics on it right here. Its false to say Hamas would not have been around without Netanyahu although its true he bolstered their presence.

No it was not, the link I provided was a poll dated 10th March 10 March 2024, 2:55 pm. A new poll finds that around three-quarters of Jewish Israelis support an expansion of IDF operations in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah, where more than half of the Strip’s 2.3 million people are sheltering in the area amid the ongoing war with Hamas https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/poll-75-of-jewish-israelis-back-rafah-operation

Regardless who's the political leader, the aims remain. Poll: 75% of Jewish Israelis back Rafah operation A new poll finds that around three-quarters of Jewish Israelis support an expansion of IDF operations in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah, where more than half of the Strip’s 2.3 million people are sheltering in the area amid the ongoing war with Hamas, while two-thirds of Arab respondents disagree. A political orientation breakdown in the Israel Democracy Institute survey shows that 45 percent of Jewish respondents who identify as left-wing support such a move, while the center and right-wing back it to a much greater extent. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/poll-75-of-jewish-israelis-back-rafah-operation

Great news, Hamas #3 confirmed killed along with another commander! Hamas confirms Marwan Issa killed - report According to the sources, the number three in Hamas’s high command was killed in the IDF strike in Nusirat, in central Gaza, while he was hiding in one of Hamas's terror tunnels. Hamas stated behind closed doors that Marwan Issa, deputy to Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif, who was targeted in an Israeli strike last week, has been killed, according to a Sunday Kan News report, citing Palestinian sources. According to the sources, the number three in Hamas’s high command was killed in the IDF strike in Nusirat, in central Gaza, while he was hiding in one of Hamas's terror tunnels. https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-792264

So Bkk Brian, please answer me just one question: No, got better things to do with my time.

I make of it what it is—one-sided. I expected nothing else from you.

Make of it what you will, its a news article from today and its about the impartiality of some of its staff. Not quite as bad as the terrorists who worked for Al Jazeera

The ever so impartial BBC having problems with its Arabic staff being impartial. BBC plunged into new bias row after journalists behind damning report accusing Israeli soldiers of beating and humiliating medics 'like' videos celebrating Hamas terror attacks BBC journalists behind a damning report which accused Israeli soldiers of beating and humiliating medics at a Gaza hospital have ‘liked’ videos celebrating Hamas terror attacks and anti-Israel posts online. The story last week led to worldwide condemnation of Israel, and was called ‘very disturbing’ by Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron who called for ‘answers’. Now The Mail on Sunday can reveal concerns about the views of two BBC Arabic reporters, Soha Ibrahim and Marie-Jose Al Azzi, who were credited with working on the story. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13205515/BBC-plunged-new-bias-row-journalists-damning-report-accusing-Israeli-soldiers-beating-humiliating-medics-like-videos-celebrating-Hamas-terror-attacks.html

Outrageous, best food on the planet from the UK and the tourists visiting appreciate the sign work.

Oh dear, infighting. Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas Fatah hits back at other Palestinian groups’ criticism over new PA prime minister Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah party hit back at criticism on Friday by Hamas and other factions over his appointment of a new prime minister they said could deepen divisions. Abbas appointed Mohammad Mustafa, a long-trusted adviser on economic affairs, as prime minister on Thursday and tasked him with forming a new government. But the factions said in a statement Friday that “making individual decisions, and engaging in formal steps that are devoid of substance, like forming a new government without national consensus, is a reinforcement of a policy of exclusion and the deepening of division.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/fatah-hits-back-at-other-palestinian-groups-criticism-over-new-pa-prime-minister/

😴 from last night. Time to move on

This one, the one I and the other poster were talking about, got it? Talks on hostage deal, ceasefire expected to resume Sunday in Doha – Egyptian officials https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/talks-on-hostage-deal-ceasefire-expected-to-resume-sunday-in-doha-egyptian-officials/

Peeps, keep counting and laughing, it may be an infinite number of posts, I did not make any claims regards that random question that is off topic to the current ceasefire in discussion.

You made a claim you cant support: "The mediators are discussing recommendations like the ones in my link. They are only irrelevant if you would only support one side's ultimatum." So you deflect instead.

Of course the talks are not live broadcast, time for a little maturity in this Smart. Its a lame deflection from your irrelevant recommendations that you say they may be discussing.

They are released because they were discussed , stop the deflection: DUBAI, March 15 (Reuters) - Hamas has presented a Gaza ceasefire proposal to mediators and the U.S. that includes the release of Israeli hostages in exchange for freedom for Palestinian prisoners, 100 of whom are serving life sentences, according to a proposal seen by Reuters. Hamas said the initial release of Israelis would include women, children, elderly and ill hostages in return for the release of 700-1,000 Palestinians held in Israeli prisons, according to the proposal. The release of Israeli "female recruits" is included. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/hamas-issues-ceasefire-proposal-mediators-which-includes-exchanging-2024-03-15/

Not in your recommendations it seems along with all the other links that have details on the talks From one hour ago................. "The failure of Hamas, the Palestinian terror group holding Israelis captive in Gaza, to provide reliable information on the number of living hostages continues to hobble the ceasefire talks, a report in the Arab media claimed on Saturday." https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel-at-war/artc-items-from-gaza-aid-packets-wash-up-on-tel-aviv-beach-live-updates

Recommendations like your ones......lol. Link to those discussions like your recommendations please?

I'm not one of the mediators, Hamas, Israel, Egypt, the US and Qatar are. They are not the ones discussing your recommendations in that link, they are irrelevant.