Bkk Brian

Sounds plausible indeed to me, hopefully those conspiracy theories won't flourish on there.

I made a statement and backed it up with plenty of credible evidence that you refuse to acknowledge. Head stuck in sand I cannot help with.

Since when do I need to prove anything to you? The evidence in the articles provides all the proof needed for me and the authors along with Elon's on voting and "Red Wave" encouragement

Where did I claim Musk said it he is right wing? my quote was : "Elon seems pretty sure" From the articles I've posted so are others: Elon Musk Is a Far-Right Activist

I assume this is you admitting that the article doesn't actually support what you said, and clearly shows that Musk said he was neither left-nor right-wing. No why should I, I quoted the article and what it actually says Musk also from the article: "I voted for Mayra Flores – first time I ever voted Republican. Massive red wave in 2022."

The why come on here and disrupt a serious topic if you don't believe in news anymore.

When you say your going to vote Republican what does that make you? from 2022: "In the past I voted Democrat, because they were (mostly) the kindness party. But they have become the party of division & hate, so I can no longer support them and will vote Republican."

You may want to add a link to that copy and paste and shorten it to a headline and 3 sentences or can we all break the forum rules now? Same with your other part two of this post

My quoted post, "Since 2022." But seeing as you've quoted one snippet, I presume you also believe the rest of the article.

Pointless discussing these so called regular warning that the BBC gave on the coming ice age when its all unverifiable and without context. Especially considering the chart you posted that gave just 10% predicting cooling and 62% predicting warming.

Elon seems pretty sure. From self-proclaimed ‘socialist’ to Team Trump and DeSantis: Elon Musk’s curious politics revealed Since 2022, his public political stances have taken a sharp rightward turn as he declared his support for the Republican Party, aligned himself with far-right activists on Twitter, disparaged transgender rights, embraced conservative conspiracy theories, and pledged to save civilisation from the “woke mind virus”. The noisy left ..........lol

Why would there not be? A quick search in google helps: Elon Musk Is a Far-Right Activist Elon Musk launches his own AI company to compete with ChatGPT

More disgusting war crimes. Get those long range weapons to Ukraine now!

There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that women are worse at chess than men. However I do see a lot of unconscious bias in many posts. Even people who are not consciously sexist can hold implicit biases that favor men in chess.

My post has no bearing on where you get or got your information from but seeing as you also claim you got "Got chucked out of medical school for asking too many questions" and its impossible for you to verify your claims that it was all over the BBC then I will take that all with a large grain of salt. Hope the fur coats went to good use.

You're wrong. Please point me to the segment where Tapper admitted Biden lied? Here's the quote: At the time Biden flatly rejected the claim, saying, "None of that is true." Tapper gave Biden the benefit of the doubt in his commentary, stating he didn’t know whether the then-candidate was "lying" at the time. Its good to see we have hosts that can be critical and reflect on previous statements made by Joe even when it means they were wrong. Damn CNN eh..... I wonder now if you'll admit you were wrong in your post?

The graph shows that even 43 years ago the majority of science literature predicted global warming. Yet you said you went rushing out to buy fur coats. In future I suggest you stick with the majority which has grown and continues to do so.

You'd think those right wing techies who complain about current AI would build their own versions.

Wait till Trump gets a hold of this, he's already been complaining about Fox news and the unflattering photos of him they publish. Donald Trump arraignment oddsmakers offer bets on how much he will weigh at Georgia booking According to BetOnline employee Dave Mason, 77 percent of gamblers have taken the over bet on Trump's weight so far, spurring the sportsbook to increase the total by eight pounds. That might rankle the former president, who on Thursday lashed out at Fox News, accusing the network of using unflattering photographs that make him look 'big' and 'orange' with his 'chin pulled way back'. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12422135/Donald-Trump-arraignment-betting-odds.html

Good to see the justice system is working, I was under the impression that it was all part of a conspiracy led by Biden, well according to Trump and his minions.

The cult climate change deniers have been out in force with their latest debunked nonsense that once the atmosphere becomes saturated with CO2 adding more CO2 will not have a significant impact on the planet's temperature. There is zero scientific evidence for this. The idea that CO2 can become saturated is based on the assumption that there is a limit to how much heat a gas can trap. However, this is not the case. CO2 can absorb an infinite amount of heat, and the more CO2 there is in the atmosphere, the more heat it will trap. In addition, even if the effect of CO2 on the atmosphere were to become saturated, this would not mean that CO2 would no longer contribute to climate change. Other greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, are also increasing in the atmosphere, and they are much more potent than CO2 Other quacks then go onto claim it will be good for plants but miss out the dire consequences for plant life. Nutrients, temperature and water being just a few. New study undercuts favorite climate myth ‘more CO2 is good for plants’ A 16-year study found that we’re at a point where more CO2 won’t keep increasing plant production, but higher temperatures will decrease it https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/sep/19/new-study-undercuts-favorite-climate-myth-more-co2-is-good-for-plants Plants cannot live on CO2 alone Plants cannot live on CO2 alone; a complete plant metabolism depends on a number of elements. It is a simple task to increase water and fertilizer and protect against insects in an enclosed greenhouse but what about doing it in the open air, throughout the entire Earth? Just as increasing the amount of starch alone in a person's diet won't lead to a more robust and healthier person, for plants additional CO2 by itself cannot make up for deficiencies of other compounds and elements. https://skepticalscience.com/co2-plant-food.htm How Climate Change Will Affect Plants Elevated levels of CO2 from climate change may enable plants to benefit from the carbon fertilization effect and use less water to grow, but it’s not all good news for plants. It’s more complicated than that, because climate change is also impacting other factors critical to plants’ growth, such as nutrients, temperature, and water. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2022/01/27/how-climate-change-will-affect-plants/

Sure and as my previous link indicated, he's been financed in his entire career by the fossil fuel industry and dark money. Yet we have members here that post his reports as credible.

Gregory Wrightstone also just happened to be a policy advisor at the Heartland Institute and executive director of the Koch-funded CO2 Coalition. He spent decades working for the natural gas industry and also director of geology at Texas Keystone, an oil and gas company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A profile on the now-defunct Wrightstone Energy Consulting website describes him as an American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)-certified petroleum geologist who “has been deeply involved in the exploration and exploitation of unconventional Appalachian Basin reservoirs for 35 years.” https://www.desmog.com/gregory-wrightstone/

You read it and missed out that its evidence was up till 2020. What you didn't highlight was the portion after that in which they said and I repeat: "Overall, fossil CO2 emissions are expected to rise by around 4.9% in 2021 with many countries/regions contributing to the recovery in emissions from 2020 lows. Global emissions will almost fully rebound, remaining only around 0.8% below 2019’s record levels, and putting the world on track to likely set a new record for fossil CO2 emissions in 2022." From 2022, their prediction was correct: Global greenhouse gas emissions at all-time high, study finds Yes I also understand trends, 10 years does not make a trend, this is a trend https://sustainableshrewsbury.org/climate/

Already debunked in my previous post: The CO2 Coalition is a successor to the George C. Marshall Institute, a think tank focusing on defense and climate issues which closed in 2015 (The think tank received extensive financial support from the fossil fuel industry.[3]). William O'Keefe, a chief executive officer of the Marshall Institute and former CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, continued as CEO of the CO2 Coalition You obviously don't look at who funds them