Bkk Brian

That link is from March. This is what Pence said yesterday “Today's indictment serves as an important reminder: anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be President of the United States,” Jack Smith was not appointed till November 2022. Jack was quick and nimble.

Another one that's not read the indictment

Nice deflection I asked what they were talking about, you did not answer that despite it being in the article and again you refuse to achknowledge the contents of the article by saying it was not over 10 years: "The witness indicated that Hunter spoke to his father every day," Goldman said. "And approximately 20 times over the course of [a] 10-year relationship, Hunter may have put his father on the phone with any number of different people, and they never once spoke about any business dealings. As he described it, it was all casual conversation, niceties, the weather, 'what's going on?' There wasn't a single conversation about any of the business dealings that Hunter had."

What in the article was he speaking about on the numerous occasions of 20 times over 10 years?

They article makes no mention of Joe being involved in his sons business stop the false representations of what it says.

They are not all like this but...........................

Do 70 million still want him as President after this? That's yet to be decided.

The important thing here is that the grand jury saw the evidence and believe it compelling enough to issue the indictments. The indictment no matter which media its reported from remains the same.

Precisely, he was probably one of those interviewed in this piece.....lol 'It's a hoax': New charges cannot shake Trump supporters' loyalty "Well it's a hoax," he says, when I ask about allegations that Trump subverted the will of the American people in attempting to overturn the result of the 2020 election. Deflecting attention to the legal travails of the president's second son is a common refrain of the Trump faithful and you hear it a lot around here. https://news.sky.com/story/its-a-hoax-new-charges-cannot-shake-trump-supporters-loyalty-12932141

Strange comment. Its not a Constitutional requirement to carry a gun in Washington. The reason he was there is because Trump put out Obamas address on truth Social and this idiot took up the challenge: Taylor Taranto allegedly made "several concerning statements" while livestreaming outside the Obama home, prosecutors said in a memo ahead of Taranto's detention hearing originally set for Wednesday afternoon. In the detention memo, the government also alleges Taranto re-posted a post from former President Donald Trump citing what was supposedly the location of the Obama home. "On Telegram, Taranto then stated, 'We got these losers surrounded! See you in hell, Podesta's and Obama's,'" according to prosecutors. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/man-guns-arrested-obama-home-attempted-evade-secret/story?id=100721557

They say it with evidence but you'll never see that as you wont read it

You don't know ie no evidence just speculation, you don't even know all that was said yet but you continue with unfounded speculation.

Where is your evidence he was involved in someone's business, 20 calls over 10 years where Hunter put his father on.

The witness knew nothing about any money: Reporter: Did he talk about the bribe at all? Biggs: He didn’t know anything about that

I don't think he did anything of the sort. He whinged for a few months about a rigged election. Whinging isnt illegal otherwise the English cricket team would be locked up. He simply asked questions. You are deliberately spreading misinformation, how your posts remain is up with such false statements is beyond me.

Fluff......? https://apnews.com/trump-election-2020-indictment The full indictment above

Probably none. Now name one president who has conspired to overturn an election as laid out in the indictment.

Have you read the transcript? All the questions asked and all the answers?

You are being very selective. The witness offered up this testimony. You only seem to belive certain parts of what he is saying though.

I read it. Over a 10 year period 20 calls, so 2 a year and it does not mention it was Joe who initiated those calls. "The witness indicated that Hunter spoke to his father every day," Goldman said. "And approximately 20 times over the course of [a] 10-year relationship, Hunter may have put his father on the phone with any number of different people, and they never once spoke about any business dealings. As he described it, it was all casual conversation, niceties, the weather, 'what's going on?' There wasn't a single conversation about any of the business dealings that Hunter had."

She's American, the color of her skin has nothing to do with this, interesting why you bring this up. Sounds like you have a bias.

Did you read the indictments document courtesy of the grand jury?

Ok if you say so, I disagree

No words have failed me, but I'll be back when they decide to actually release the transcript.

Amazing how you fail to see how relevant it was to the post I was responding to, congratulations