dinsdale

Magnificent. You have demonstrated without doubt your knowledge of economics by posting I would guess the 1st thing you typed into YouTube with the search being "why Trump economics is bad". Well done.

It would seem that wisdom and the art of mature discourse has evaded you so far. Never mind. The time may yet come.

State owned radio/TV in Britain, Australia and Canada for example are extremely biased. They push the MESSAGE.

Being that you have posted your economic theory qualifications i.e. "Economics 101" you must be able to tell us all why this will be the case. Of course if you're actually smart you will be able to support this in your own words supported with citations. Let's see who the fool actually is. Awaiting your desperate Democrat/MSNBC/MSM/the "syndrome that cannot be named" response. You have stated something now support your statement.

Agree. It's just pitiful these people that can't grow up and accept that Trump is the POTUS. Guess they would still want a mentally impaired person aka Biden or a complete idiot aka Harris as the POTUS. People voted for change.

You need to support this with some sources. Whilst you're at it how about adding the current US approval rating.

Yep. You're correct. Everyone in Britain is happy with Starmer. I tip my hat to your political nous. Well done.

Nope. Comment was absolute baiting nonsense.

Why do you need to post something like this when it's obvious what your opinion is? BTW is outstanding that that you can speak for "the overwhelming majority of Europeans". When was the last time you had a conversation with these hundreds of millions of people about Trump?

Why? Political donations aka lobbying is part and parcel of the flawed American political system.

Indeed. Drain the money out of the corrupt pockets. Pockets filled with tax payers money.

It's a good point. Thing is Trump ran on changing this trough feeding Democrat's corruption and the voters agreed and voted him in. Now the huge waste of tax payer's money is being uncovered. Do you think this is a bad thing? Try answering with a rational and logical answer not just more anti-Trump the " syndrome that cannot be named" response. BTW best not to talk about donations though. The list of donators aka billionaires/millionaires for Harris was quite extensive.

I'm guessing you haven't seen the footage otherwise you could say according to the millions that saw it live/have seen it. Oh well. You just keep on grasping at those little anti-Trump straws you can't get rid of.

Seems to be catching.

I'll tell you what's "GENIUS". You're satire. Brilliant. It is satire isn't it?

One very big thing this article failed to mention was Swift being loudly booed and Trump being loudly cheered.

Taylor Swift being booed and Trump being cheered. Now there's a highlight.

So a dozen or so charging stations so far for $5,000,000,000 of tax payers money is a positive? Learn something new every day.

Hence the laughing emoji. Vaping is very widespread. The only enforcement will be on tourists. Bit like the old discarded cigarette trap in BKK.

Not often I attach emojis but

So not a general then. Maybe a colonel?

Sadly idiots populate every nation on earth. Some of them travel to other countries and take their idiocy with them.

The more you post the more you show yourself to have absolutely no idea what your talking about. "Russian forces advanced 430 square kilometres (166 square miles) into Ukrainian territory in January and are headed towards the logistics hub of Pokrovsk, according to an AFP analysis of data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW). This marks a slight slowdown compared to previous months, after a record advance of 725 square kilometres in November and 476 square kilometres in December. More than 80 percent of Russia’s advances in January took place in the Donetsk region, where Moscow’s troops are trying to capture the key city of Pokrovsk. The Russian army also advanced about 50 square kilometres on the northeastern front around the city of Kupiansk." https://www.kyivpost.com/post/46493 Your posts are purely "emotional" based on absolutely nothing of substance.

I think you'll find that the numbers of volunteers has reduced dramatically and conscription age is 25. This is why there is a problem with the numbers available to go to war. Desertion and AWOL is also a factor.