cocoonclub

Here: ราชกิจจานุเบกษา But you’ll be wasting your time. As I wrote already, what the other guy claimed doesn’t exist in the law, but feel free to read the 150+ pages yourself if you don’t believe me.

Not according to the law. It doesn’t say that. What’s relevant is what is in the law, not what’s not in the law.

I could but why should I provide free translation work or legal advice to you?

Yeah, that’s how they always sound like.

It’s impossible for farang men to make friends with Thai men. You gotta keep in mind that farang men are frustrated losers; overweight, bald, and fast aging moaners and complainers who have a superiority issue and are into dark farm girls.

I wanna hear the “Thai legal definition”. Because you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. Are those the same NGOs that make money of this issue? The same NGOs whose sole raison d'etre is child prostitution? And of course I won’t search for anything. You’re the one who made an accusation, so we can expect you to provide hard evidence from a trusted source that this is indeed as widespread a problem as you claim it to be. Then I’d be the first one to admit you’re right. But as long as you don’t have much more to offer than anecdotal evidence and the claims from dubious NGOs, I will keep calling it nonsense.

The Thai penal code. And I’m amazed how you guys “disagree” with something just to admit that you haven’t even read it. Bravo. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised about foreigners crying foul for their own failure to know the laws of their host country.

Where did I say that this means “need money for a snack”? I’m very well aware it’s code for sex services, but that doesn’t mean that Thai social media is full of child prostitution. I never said it doesn’t exist. What I said is that: while Thai social media may be full of girls offering their services, I highly doubt it’s full of children being offered for sex.

That’s nonsense. You’re confusing legislature, executive and judiciary. I didn’t express any position which I would have to defend. I stated a fact. Don’t blame me for what others created. Start a petition or a protest if you don’t like that the laws don’t contain any of the excuses or exceptions that you wanna see.

The term รับงาน is completely innocent as it is the general term for looking for work/a job. It’s certainly being used by girls looking for work as a freelancer or similar, but it’s also (and probably more often) used by anyone else looking for work whether that’s being a cleaner or a tutor or a sales staff.

Because the law says so, whether you disagree or not.

I call this nonsense. Social media sites these days are very active against these issues, and they have very capable content moderation teams, including AI. It would also be incredibly stupid for a pimp to post this online for the police to easily track him down by his IP address. Human trafficking certainly exists in Thailand, but I doubt it happens in your face like this.

“special girl”? I didn’t know there’s a code word for ordering someone underage.

Load of nonsense. It’s your responsibility to obey the laws and not have sex with kids.

I never felt a chick coming to my place for Netflix and chill paid for sex just because she had some expenses.

Nope. You’re wrong. It would be still completely irrelevant.

It doesn’t matter what you think. If we were to take every nonsense that people think seriously, we would be living on a flat earth ruled by reptiloids who put chips in your arm. We must not forgive him. Though it seems you’re using him to excuse underage prostitution, in the typical Whataboutism fashion.

Completely irrelevant.

Completely irrelevant.

Why would millions of Chinese tourists give a damn about a couple of druggies stupid enough to commit a crime in a foreign country? Did millions of tourists stop going to Bali after they caught those heroin smuggling begpackers?

So you finally got it that this announcement is nothing to moan and whine about. Congrats. It felt like I was talking to one given how you were throwing a tantrum about something that’s neither an issue nor unlikely to affect you anyway as I doubt you’d have 1m to invest here.

You trying to speak for everyone else doesn’t change the fact that you’re wrong — laws can and do change everywhere. All I can see is that you’re so butt hurt about being wrong that you’re desperately trying to speak for others to make up for your own lack of arguments, and calling names that you can’t even explain. But again, it doesn’t change the fact that laws can and do change in every country.

You also don’t know what the laws in the US or EU will be in 5 years.

I don’t know what a “Thai apologist” is and I’m not wrong: Laws are being reviewed and can change in every country. The one “completely wrong” is you if you really thought that thats is only the case for “a red light at an intersection”.

That wasn’t the point of criticism. The point of criticism was that laws can change, which they can and do in every country. Where does it say that land ownership is being reviewed after 5 years? The law is being reviewed, that doesn’t mean that your ownership of already acquired land is also being reviewed.