Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling? Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling? Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling? Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling? Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling? Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling? Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling? Thanks, but Danderman's claim was "Concealment of a campaign finance violation." which is not covered under Penal Law §175.10, so neither of you know, that's what I thought. Are you still just trolling?
That's what I thought. "Truth is not a left-wing value."