Yellowtail

To be fair, something has to be converted to electricity, it then the electivity has to be used to charge the battery. and then the battery has to provide the electricity to power the vehicle. Right now, most EV's are powered by electricity generated by fossil fuel. ICEV burn fossil fuel to power the vehicle directly.

The "reality" is that you made it all up, stated it all as fact, and were unable to support any of it. Too funny

In any event, the monthly charge for a SIM is not significant,

Nonsense indeed. You claimed nuclear power was not viable. You implied it took 25 years to build and nuclear power plant. You claimed it would take 25 years to develop pink hydrogen, and claimed to know what it would cost. When asked about your claim of 25 years to develop pink hydrogen and the cost, you waffled and claimed it would not be developed in 25 years. When ask what experts you refer to when you claim "most" agree, you make a glib comment and provide a google search. You have not supported any of these claims. So no, I do not expect you to name articles you have read or remember who wrote them, but I do expect you to at least make some attempt at supporting the claims you make, but you provide nothing. To be clear, you think it reasonable to claim as fact that "most experts agree" based only on your interpretation of the articles you have read, correct? That explains a lot.

At the auto show Havel has an HEV for (I think) $800K and it had five-year 100kkm warranty for the whole car, and I think 8-year unlimited milage for the battery (to 70%) and electrics. Pretty impressive.

Clearly that is not the case, because JBChiangRai has posted any number of false claims has refused to even try to support them.

Anyone that remembers the big diesel fuel price hike in Thailand some years ago should have an idea how quickly people will adapt when it saves them a lot of money. In six months, I would guess half of the over the road trucks had been converted to LP/CNG.

That explains a lot.

You claimed nuclear power was not viable. You implied it took 25 years to build and nuclear power plant. You claimed it would take 25 years to develop pink hydrogen, and claimed to know what it would cost. When asked about your claim of 25 years to develop pink hydrogen and the cost, you waffled and claimed it would not be developed in 25 years. When ask what experts you refer to when you claim "most" agree, you make a glib comment and provide a google search. You have not supported any of these claims. So no, I do not expect you to name articles you have read or remember who wrote them, but I do expect you to at least make some attempt at supporting the claims you make, but you provide nothing. To be clear, you think it reasonable to claim as fact that "most experts agree" based only on your interpretation of the articles you have read, correct? That explains a lot.

So not an English teacher, a lawyer of a Constitutional scholar. Ethnic studies major perhaps?

You lose credibility when play fast and loose with facts and make silly claims and do not even attempt to support.

I think it safe to say you will not be providing any examples of the false claims you are accusing me of making. Weak

No, you apparently have me confused. It's my position that it is a made-up crime. What law might he have broken by banging a porn actress and paying her to sign an NDA that she reneged on?

What Constitutional law has Trump been indicted for?

Certainly if the EV industry and their fan-boys (just kidding) and leftist governments have anything to say about it..

It won't be available for 25 years, but you know what it costs. Who do the experts you are referring to work for?

What claims am I trying to support?

It certainly won't if the EV industry and their fan-boys (just kidding) have anything to say about it...

Nuclear production will never be viable? It's been viable for almost 70 years. By a wide margin, most of France's electoral power is nuclear. Up to 25 years. Twenty of the 25-year lead time is political. Average is under ten, and it can be as little as four.

So you did not read the article?

Unverified recoding. stinky sauce

I want to know how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. Apparently you don't know.

And EVs were here for over a hundred years, yes? f the issue with H is the cost, and if it can be effectively produced for "free" as a byproduct of producing electricity, market share will grow exponentially.

About an hour and ten minutes observing the speed limits

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyway.