Yellowtail

I know you are

yes

Nice tip, thanks!

The victims and or the taxpayer.

If rockets/missiles are being fired from a hospital, the hospital is a legitimate military target, and the people firing the rockets/missiles from the hospital are war criminals.

Yes, the US is so much better now that half the people do not stand for the anthem, kids don't know the pledge of allegiance or the words to the national anthem.

So, if you were somewhere that that broke out in a rally supporting hamas, you would join the crowd? I think not.

In the US, people that have no money and no insurance do not have to pay.

I said nothing of fault, clearly the driver is at fault. My concern is with liability, it is completely different. If liability is with the company renting the vehicle (as it most always is in the west), the rental company is responsible for making the victim whole and collecting from their customer, the driver/renter. You can't get blood from a turnip.

Like driving from Los Angeles to Miami and hoping you don't run out of gas,

From all the reports made by the sexpats anyways...

Because I think the people participating in the behaviors should pay for the results of the behavior. Right now, if some bone-head rents a motorcycle and runs me down on the sidewalk, I would be liable for my medical bills, and my taxes will ultimately pay for bone-head's medical bills.

It is only obvious to people that do not think things through. When six people buy insurance, only six people are covered. When 100 people buy insurance, 100 people have to be covered. The people already buying insurance generally have assets they stand to lose. The people that go without insurance, often do not. Right now, you pay the money and get the travel insurance. You (apparently) want to compel people to provide a lot of personal information that the insurance company has to verify, which would take weeks and add cost.

I think the easiest/best thing to do is to make the rental companies liable.

To a lot of people, it is pretty black and white. The side that in intentionally targeting civilians is evil and needs to be eradicated. The only people that see a lot of grey, are the people claiming the intentional targeting of civilians is justified.

So be it.

You're not answering, you're just repeating your claim. You previously claimed: "The election was in 2006, and the US & Israel have not permitted another election or the emergence of younger moderates to contest new Palestinian elections." What are the US and Israel doing to prevent elections?

Looks like the Ranger

Some American families call Joe Biden, Donald Trump and Abraham Lincon traitors,

The hostages are worth a lot more to hamas than the Palestinians.

Unless maybe she lost control and slid in front of him. The article in not clear enough to do anything but guess. In any evet, even is another motorcyclist was at fault, it is not likely they have the money to cover it,

How have the US and Israel disallowed elections?

Of course, mandating insurance and forcing insurers to cover anything that happens will absolutely drive the cost down, great thinking. How will you determine which travelers are higher risk?

Of course, nothing that puts hamas in a negative light is factual.