Yellowtail

Apparently saving the Salmon is more important than saving the planet.

It's all about votes and social engineering. If they really thought CO2 was going to kill us, why are they not building nukes as fast as they can? California is demolishing three perfectly good hydro-electric dams, mandating solar panels and banning gas stoves. The US government does nothing about private jets, but they are mandating ceiling fans be energy efficient. It nice when you don't have to suffer the effects of your ideology...

Where are all the solar panels?

Apparently, the hottest ever, is actually the hottest ever in the last 150 years. How funny is that? NASA Clocks July 2023 as Hottest Month on Record Ever Since 1880 | NASA

It requires a water line, so you'd need to buy an inline filter.

Does the fridge have a reservoir you refill or a water line that attaches directly? Most have reservoirs you refill.

That it is round, does not mean it is not flat.

It is also factual that as planet warms, everyone is getting older as well.

In any event, I don't know why they are moving north, but I agree that a changing climate could well be at least one of the reasons. Loss/change of habitat could be another reason. Changing habitats in the north could be a reason. Introduction of a preditor in the south could be a reason. Resistance to pesticides could be a reason. Pollution could be a reason. I think an "expert" would be able to provide the other reasons, but the writer only needed one. You link to the article and act is factual, yet it looks to be nothing but clickbait to me. That is where I get the idea that you "eat it all up". You claim that you "...look at the facts and evidence available not make believe like flat earthers." yet you seem to define any article you agree with as factual.

So, you don't know. I thought it would be obvious to anyone not blinded by their ideology. That said, it could be fake what with Photoshop and whatnot. The article(s) said (I am paraphrasing) that the "experts" thought climate change was accelerating the move north, correct? This would indicate they were already moving north, correct?

I have great power, and have not had any outage for months, and then it was momentary. Had great power at my last two places as well. Where do you live that you have bad power?

Do you really not know what he was showing with the two different weather graphics? What I do not like about the mosquito, fire, immigration, homelessness etc. stories "blaming" global warming, is that it always seems like a cover for failed policies, programs or management. Sure, they can blame everything on global warming and (apparently) you will eat it up, but a lot of people (flat-Earthers or otherwise) don't. They see it as incompetence hiding behind a hot-button issue. The mosquitos are and have been moving north for a number of reasons, climate could well be one, but why is that the only reason they site?

I think the iSmart badges are hilarious...

Dude is just winding you up.

Why not just let it go? You're post is not adding anything of substance either.

Relatively constant compared to what? The Earth is relatively flat.

The Earth is warming for a number of reasons, including human activity, do you believe otherwise? Solar activity is not constant. Do you even understand what constant means? I don't believe it is. Do you have anything that supports this?

So even the writer knew it may not have been accelerated by climate change, but no doubt the climate angle helps sell their work. In any event, the statement at least implies that the "disease-carrying tiger mosquitoes..." would be advancing through northern Europe even without climate change, albeit at a slower pace. yes?

Thinking the Earth could warm without the Sun is stupider.

Because of the Sun.

I don't doubt for a moment that warming allows some pests to move northwards, nor did I say or imply anything contrary to that. I don't know if the article is true or not, but I do know that only a fool would consider it proof of anything. It amuses that that you guys all assume everything you read that reinforces your ideology is a fact.

Brian's article said "health experts" and said nothing of climate scientists. Try to follow along.

The writer is (apparently) a freelance jounalist that writes stories for a living. He is neither a health expert, not a climate change expert. adam plowright - Google Search

You don't know for a fact that it was a science experts. There are education majors who work in the field of climatology to study how climate change affects habitat, and we all know about them...