Yellowtail

Per ozimoron, our resident STEM major, the warming is caused 100% by burning fossil fuels. Is not the problem with burning fossil fuels primarily that it generates CO2? If not, that, what? So is climate change ending the world as we know it or not? Because every alarmist I hear from is a leftist, though many claim to be centrists and whatnot. The idiotic carbon tax is just a permit the rich (left and right) can buy so they do not have to alter their lifestyle. And how would the carbon tax do anything to "...deal with global warming..." if CO2 is not causing it? So, what is the plan, if not to reduce our CO2 output by a few percentage points? And how is that going so far?

So, the world is ending because we are generating too much CO2, and the left is going to save the world by reducing the amount of CO2 we generate by a few percentage points. Seems like a great plan to me.

You claimed: "...warming is 100% caused by burning fossil fuels." That is just wrong on so many levels, arithmetically being a just one.

Another alarmist that does not even understand arithmetic.

I think the problem with the alarmists is that most of the people claiming science science science barely seen to understand arithmetic. I have never claimed the Earth was not warming, or that human activity is not impacting the climate, I have in fact stated the opposite any number of times, yet I am called a denialist.

So, anyone to the right of Friedrich Engels is an extremist, got it.

While the learning curve is steeper for stick, once you learn it is much more versatile than MIG. Anyone with decent vision can learn to stick-weld horizontal on steel over 2mm thick easily in a day. Read a bit, watch a few videos, buy the correct electrodes and practice for a few hours and you'll get it.

Ladies Home

This was produced back before we had science...

I was responding to someone that falsely claimed: "The richest people are related to the fossil fuel industry and they get richer by bribing right wing politicians to do nothing." One would have to be super, ultra daft to think your post supports the claim.

A claim (among others) that you did not support.

Why not just increase the tax on the people that buy it?

Who said the climate was not changing?

Not even the top ten, but to not be lying, you would still have to show that they are "...bribing right wing politicians to do nothing."

Another idiotic, unsupported claim from the left, I'm shocked.

You claimed: "The richest people are related to the fossil fuel industry and they get richer by bribing right wing politicians to do nothing." Yeah, there are a few on the list, but none at the top of the list, and none of them are "...bribing right wing politicians to do nothing." "Honesty is not a left-wing value."

None in the top 50... Forbes Billionaires 2023: The Richest People In The World

Dude claimed: "The richest people are related to the fossil fuel industry and they get richer by bribing right wing politicians to do nothing." Your article does not support that, in fact, it does the opposite. The article claims the entire oil and gas industry spent a piddly $84M to support the right, while Mark Zuckerberg alone donated over $400M to support the left. When you consider the bulk of gas and oil production is in red states, does it surprise anyone (not on the left) that that's where they donate their money? I think Hollywood and mainstream media is doing more to ruin the world than the oil industry ever thought about, and we all know where their donations go...

25% is not a huge difference?

Do you have anything that supports your nonsense?

That says a lot more about Biden's presidency than Trump.

Flux-core is okay, particularity outside, but gas is better.

I assume the Earth is warming, and I assume human activity contributes to it, but I think the bulk of what the left is doing about it is ridiculous. But I think it does win a lot of votes and make a lot of rich people richer.

Who would fund such studies?

"If you meet more than one a-hole in a day, it's you."